• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M
An investor filed a lawsuit against Dolce & Gabbana due to delays in the release of NFTs

An investor filed a lawsuit against Dolce & Gabbana due to delays in the release of NFTs

user avatar

by Eve Adams

2 years ago


Investor Luke Brown filed a class-action lawsuit in federal court in Manhattan, claiming he spent about $6,000 on NFTs from the Italian fashion house. These DGFamily collectible tokens were marketed as a "set of digital, physical, and experimental privileges" that could be traded via the Ethereum network. Dolce & Gabbana assured buyers that purchasing the DGFamily NFTs would grant access to various digital rewards, physical products, and exclusive events.

However, the token release was delayed despite the promised special benefits. The plaintiff claims that the digital clothing sets appeared 20 days later than scheduled and were only available on a metaverse platform with a limited number of users. Even after the digital costumes were released, token holders could not use them for another 11 days because Dolce & Gabbana did not receive timely approval from the metaverse platform.

As a result, these NFTs depreciated by 97%, causing the lead plaintiff to incur a loss of $5,800. UNXD, an NFT trading platform, is also mentioned as a defendant. Brown is seeking compensation for personal damages from the companies and legal protection for other affected investors.

Dolce&Gabbana promised products they failed to deliver, then abandoned the project and the community they committed to supporting, the plaintiff stated.

It is worth noting that in 2021, Dolce&Gabbana earned $5.6 million from the sale of Collezione Genesi NFTs on the UNXD platform. Last year, the Italian brand participated in the annual Metaverse Fashion Week (MVFW).

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Crypto Industry Divided Over Bitcoin's Exclusion from PARITY Act

chest

The exclusion of Bitcoin from the Digital Asset PARITY Act's tax exemption has sparked significant debate within the crypto industry, highlighting divisions between supporters and advocates.

user avatarDavid Robinson

PARITY Act and Lummis Bill Present Divergent Paths for Crypto Taxation

chest

The PARITY Act and the competing Lummis bill differ significantly in their approach to crypto tax exemptions.

user avatarAndrew Smith

Automated Execution Systems Gain Traction in Futures Markets

chest

The shift from manual operations to automated execution is accelerating in the futures markets, driven by the advantages of futures contracts.

user avatarZainab Kamara

CFTC Announces Framework for Crypto Perpetual Futures

chest

CFTC Chairman Michael Selig announced plans to create a framework for crypto perpetual futures during the Milken Institute Future of Finance conference.

user avatarJacob Williams

OneBullEx Launches Futures-Focused Derivatives Exchange

chest

OneBullEx has launched a futures-focused derivatives exchange, providing a seamless infrastructure for automated trading.

user avatarSon Min-ho

Umbra's Public Launch Follows High Demand for Privacy Solutions

chest

Umbra's public launch follows high demand for privacy solutions.

user avatarAyman Ben Youssef

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.