Australia’s federal court recently made a significant decision regarding fintech firm Block Earner. The court, presided over by Justice Ian Jackman, found that Block Earner had offered a cryptocurrency yield-bearing product without obtaining a financial services license. Despite this violation, the court made the surprising move of relieving Block Earner from paying a fine. Justice Jackman's ruling emphasized that Block Earner had acted in good faith. The company had explored the idea of obtaining a license before the launch of its yield-bearing 'Earner' product. After conducting thorough research and seeking legal advice, Block Earner concluded that a license was unnecessary.

Block Earner’s founder and CEO, Charlie Karaboga, expressed that seeking legal counsel before the product launch demonstrated the company's commitment to acting honestly and within legal boundaries. While Karaboga acknowledged the lack of a financial penalty, he pointed out the negative impact on the firm's reputation and the financial losses incurred through legal expenses.

In a notable decision, Justice Jackman rejected the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC)'s request for a substantial fine of $234,000. Block Earner had proposed a significantly lower penalty of $40,000, which was three times the amount earned from the disputed product. This decision stirred mixed feelings for Karaboga, who refrained from labeling it as a 'fair ruling' due to the associated reputational harm.

ASIC, in response to the court's judgment, announced that it is reviewing the outcome. Earlier in February, Justice Jackman had ruled that Block Earner’s 'Earner' products required an Australian Financial Services License, as they provided yield on various cryptocurrencies.

Notably, Block Earner's 'DeFi Access' product, enabling the use of the Aave lending protocol, was exempt from penalties as it was not categorized as a managed investment scheme.

The legal battle between ASIC and Block Earner began in November 2022 when ASIC alleged that both the Earner and DeFi Access products operated as managed investment schemes without adequate licensing. Block Earner had ceased its Earner product before the court proceedings commenced.

For more insights into Australia's regulatory landscape and related court rulings, subscribe to Crypto City's magazine for in-depth information on the world of crypto and finance.