• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

Australian Court Rules in Favor of Block Earner on Crypto Product Licensing Issue

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

2 years ago


Australia’s federal court recently made a significant decision regarding fintech firm Block Earner. The court, presided over by Justice Ian Jackman, found that Block Earner had offered a cryptocurrency yield-bearing product without obtaining a financial services license. Despite this violation, the court made the surprising move of relieving Block Earner from paying a fine. Justice Jackman's ruling emphasized that Block Earner had acted in good faith. The company had explored the idea of obtaining a license before the launch of its yield-bearing 'Earner' product. After conducting thorough research and seeking legal advice, Block Earner concluded that a license was unnecessary.

Block Earner’s founder and CEO, Charlie Karaboga, expressed that seeking legal counsel before the product launch demonstrated the company's commitment to acting honestly and within legal boundaries. While Karaboga acknowledged the lack of a financial penalty, he pointed out the negative impact on the firm's reputation and the financial losses incurred through legal expenses.

In a notable decision, Justice Jackman rejected the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC)'s request for a substantial fine of $234,000. Block Earner had proposed a significantly lower penalty of $40,000, which was three times the amount earned from the disputed product. This decision stirred mixed feelings for Karaboga, who refrained from labeling it as a 'fair ruling' due to the associated reputational harm.

ASIC, in response to the court's judgment, announced that it is reviewing the outcome. Earlier in February, Justice Jackman had ruled that Block Earner’s 'Earner' products required an Australian Financial Services License, as they provided yield on various cryptocurrencies.

Notably, Block Earner's 'DeFi Access' product, enabling the use of the Aave lending protocol, was exempt from penalties as it was not categorized as a managed investment scheme.

The legal battle between ASIC and Block Earner began in November 2022 when ASIC alleged that both the Earner and DeFi Access products operated as managed investment schemes without adequate licensing. Block Earner had ceased its Earner product before the court proceedings commenced.

For more insights into Australia's regulatory landscape and related court rulings, subscribe to Crypto City's magazine for in-depth information on the world of crypto and finance.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Securitize and tZERO Enter Legal Battle Over Tokenized Securities

chest

Securitize and tZERO are currently engaged in a legal dispute in Delaware concerning the infrastructure for tokenized securities.

user avatarLucas Weissmann

Ted Pillows Releases New Report on Liquidation Data

chest

Ted Pillows has released a new report based on liquidation data, offering valuable insights into current financial trends.

user avatarFilippo Romano

Bitcoin's Leverage Reset Highlights Key Support Levels

chest

The latest leverage reset in Bitcoin has highlighted the 60,000 support area, prompting traders to evaluate market stability and potential weaknesses.

user avatarEmily Carter

Cardano's Leios Scaling Work Gains Attention

chest

Cardano's latest update on Leios aims to enhance transaction capacity while maintaining security and compatibility, drawing focus back to its technical roadmap.

user avatarTomas Novak

Investors Weigh XRP vs Bitcoin Amid Regulatory Changes

chest

As the July 1, 2026 deadline approaches in California, many investors are questioning whether they should sell XRP and buy Bitcoin due to the new Digital Financial Assets Law and its implications for Ripple's compliance.

user avatarKaterina Papadopoulou

Hyperliquid's Model Signals Shift in Crypto Market Dynamics

chest

The recent discussion surrounding Hyperliquid's noKYC model has significant implications for the crypto market, particularly in terms of institutional adoption and regulatory sensitivity.

user avatarMaya Lundqvist

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.