• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

Australian Court Rules in Favor of Block Earner on Crypto Product Licensing Issue

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

2 years ago


Australia’s federal court recently made a significant decision regarding fintech firm Block Earner. The court, presided over by Justice Ian Jackman, found that Block Earner had offered a cryptocurrency yield-bearing product without obtaining a financial services license. Despite this violation, the court made the surprising move of relieving Block Earner from paying a fine. Justice Jackman's ruling emphasized that Block Earner had acted in good faith. The company had explored the idea of obtaining a license before the launch of its yield-bearing 'Earner' product. After conducting thorough research and seeking legal advice, Block Earner concluded that a license was unnecessary.

Block Earner’s founder and CEO, Charlie Karaboga, expressed that seeking legal counsel before the product launch demonstrated the company's commitment to acting honestly and within legal boundaries. While Karaboga acknowledged the lack of a financial penalty, he pointed out the negative impact on the firm's reputation and the financial losses incurred through legal expenses.

In a notable decision, Justice Jackman rejected the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC)'s request for a substantial fine of $234,000. Block Earner had proposed a significantly lower penalty of $40,000, which was three times the amount earned from the disputed product. This decision stirred mixed feelings for Karaboga, who refrained from labeling it as a 'fair ruling' due to the associated reputational harm.

ASIC, in response to the court's judgment, announced that it is reviewing the outcome. Earlier in February, Justice Jackman had ruled that Block Earner’s 'Earner' products required an Australian Financial Services License, as they provided yield on various cryptocurrencies.

Notably, Block Earner's 'DeFi Access' product, enabling the use of the Aave lending protocol, was exempt from penalties as it was not categorized as a managed investment scheme.

The legal battle between ASIC and Block Earner began in November 2022 when ASIC alleged that both the Earner and DeFi Access products operated as managed investment schemes without adequate licensing. Block Earner had ceased its Earner product before the court proceedings commenced.

For more insights into Australia's regulatory landscape and related court rulings, subscribe to Crypto City's magazine for in-depth information on the world of crypto and finance.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

XRPL Lending Proposal Opens Door To Institutional Credit

chest

The XRPL community is currently voting on amendments that could enhance institutional credit infrastructure on the XRP Ledger.

user avatarArif Mukhtar

TRON Stablecoin Volume Reaches 196T Amid Rising USDT Demand

chest

In Q1 2026, TRON processed a staggering 196 trillion in stablecoin transactions, primarily fueled by the low-fee TRC20 USDT transactions.

user avatarMaria Gutierrez

Diverging Futures Trends for Solana and Dogecoin

chest

Recent market activity shows a significant divergence in the futures trends of Solana and Dogecoin, with Dogecoin's open interest falling and Solana's rising, indicating different market sentiments.

user avatarDavid Robinson

XRP Shows Positive Onchain Activity Amid Reduced Speculative Leverage

chest

XRP shows a significant increase in daily active addresses alongside a decrease in speculative derivatives leverage, indicating a healthier market environment.

user avatarAndrew Smith

Binance Withdraws MiCA Application from Greece

chest

Binance has withdrawn its MiCA application from Greece after reports indicated it would be denied, seeking approval through another EU member nation.

user avatarZainab Kamara

Binance Faces $200 Million Lawsuit in the UK

chest

Binance and its founder Changpeng Zhao are facing a UK lawsuit seeking nearly $200 million for allegedly offering complex financial instruments without regulatory approval.

user avatarJacob Williams

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.