• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

Australian Court Rules in Favor of Block Earner on Crypto Product Licensing Issue

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

2 years ago


Australia’s federal court recently made a significant decision regarding fintech firm Block Earner. The court, presided over by Justice Ian Jackman, found that Block Earner had offered a cryptocurrency yield-bearing product without obtaining a financial services license. Despite this violation, the court made the surprising move of relieving Block Earner from paying a fine. Justice Jackman's ruling emphasized that Block Earner had acted in good faith. The company had explored the idea of obtaining a license before the launch of its yield-bearing 'Earner' product. After conducting thorough research and seeking legal advice, Block Earner concluded that a license was unnecessary.

Block Earner’s founder and CEO, Charlie Karaboga, expressed that seeking legal counsel before the product launch demonstrated the company's commitment to acting honestly and within legal boundaries. While Karaboga acknowledged the lack of a financial penalty, he pointed out the negative impact on the firm's reputation and the financial losses incurred through legal expenses.

In a notable decision, Justice Jackman rejected the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC)'s request for a substantial fine of $234,000. Block Earner had proposed a significantly lower penalty of $40,000, which was three times the amount earned from the disputed product. This decision stirred mixed feelings for Karaboga, who refrained from labeling it as a 'fair ruling' due to the associated reputational harm.

ASIC, in response to the court's judgment, announced that it is reviewing the outcome. Earlier in February, Justice Jackman had ruled that Block Earner’s 'Earner' products required an Australian Financial Services License, as they provided yield on various cryptocurrencies.

Notably, Block Earner's 'DeFi Access' product, enabling the use of the Aave lending protocol, was exempt from penalties as it was not categorized as a managed investment scheme.

The legal battle between ASIC and Block Earner began in November 2022 when ASIC alleged that both the Earner and DeFi Access products operated as managed investment schemes without adequate licensing. Block Earner had ceased its Earner product before the court proceedings commenced.

For more insights into Australia's regulatory landscape and related court rulings, subscribe to Crypto City's magazine for in-depth information on the world of crypto and finance.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Zcash Surges to New High as Institutional Interest Grows

chest

Zcash (ZEC) has surged to a new year-to-date high of 590, driven by significant institutional investment from Multicoin Capital.

user avatarTenzin Dorje

Sabadell Joins European Banking Consortium for Stablecoin Initiative

chest

Spanish bank Sabadell has joined the Qivalis consortium aimed at launching a Europe-pegged stablecoin.

user avatarBayarjavkhlan Ganbaatar

Ripple CEO Highlights Critical Hearing for CLARITY Act's Future

chest

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse emphasizes the importance of the upcoming Senate Banking Committee hearing for the CLARITY Act's progress.

user avatarMohamed Farouk

Bitcoin Holds Steady Above 80,000 as Market Recovery is Tested

chest

Bitcoin's price remains above 80,000, indicating a recovery from March lows, with differing behaviors observed among large holders.

user avatarElias Mukuru

Gerstein Harrow LLP Files Restraining Notice Over Ethereum Linked to Kelp DAO Hack

chest

Gerstein Harrow LLP has filed a restraining notice in a New York district court, claiming legal rights to approximately 30,766 Ethereum frozen after the Kelp DAO hack.

user avatarDiego Alvarez

Aave Takes Legal Action to Release Frozen Ethereum in Kelp DAO Hack Case

chest

Aave has filed an emergency motion in a New York district court to vacate a restraining notice blocking the Arbitrum DAO from accessing approximately 30,766 Ethereum frozen after the Kelp DAO hack.

user avatarKenji Takahashi

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.