• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

Australian Court Rules in Favor of Block Earner on Crypto Product Licensing Issue

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

2 years ago


Australia’s federal court recently made a significant decision regarding fintech firm Block Earner. The court, presided over by Justice Ian Jackman, found that Block Earner had offered a cryptocurrency yield-bearing product without obtaining a financial services license. Despite this violation, the court made the surprising move of relieving Block Earner from paying a fine. Justice Jackman's ruling emphasized that Block Earner had acted in good faith. The company had explored the idea of obtaining a license before the launch of its yield-bearing 'Earner' product. After conducting thorough research and seeking legal advice, Block Earner concluded that a license was unnecessary.

Block Earner’s founder and CEO, Charlie Karaboga, expressed that seeking legal counsel before the product launch demonstrated the company's commitment to acting honestly and within legal boundaries. While Karaboga acknowledged the lack of a financial penalty, he pointed out the negative impact on the firm's reputation and the financial losses incurred through legal expenses.

In a notable decision, Justice Jackman rejected the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC)'s request for a substantial fine of $234,000. Block Earner had proposed a significantly lower penalty of $40,000, which was three times the amount earned from the disputed product. This decision stirred mixed feelings for Karaboga, who refrained from labeling it as a 'fair ruling' due to the associated reputational harm.

ASIC, in response to the court's judgment, announced that it is reviewing the outcome. Earlier in February, Justice Jackman had ruled that Block Earner’s 'Earner' products required an Australian Financial Services License, as they provided yield on various cryptocurrencies.

Notably, Block Earner's 'DeFi Access' product, enabling the use of the Aave lending protocol, was exempt from penalties as it was not categorized as a managed investment scheme.

The legal battle between ASIC and Block Earner began in November 2022 when ASIC alleged that both the Earner and DeFi Access products operated as managed investment schemes without adequate licensing. Block Earner had ceased its Earner product before the court proceedings commenced.

For more insights into Australia's regulatory landscape and related court rulings, subscribe to Crypto City's magazine for in-depth information on the world of crypto and finance.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Bitcoin Evangelist Blames Trump Family for October 2025 Crypto Crash

chest

Davinci Jeremie attributes the October 10, 2025, crypto market crash to the financial interests of the Trump family, suggesting their actions influenced the market.

user avatarMiguel Rodriguez

Trump's Economic Policy Remarks and Geopolitical Tensions

chest

Trump discusses economic policies, military operations against Iran, and criticizes NATO.

user avatarLuis Flores

Federal Reserve's Money Printing Sparks Concerns Over Dollar's Future

chest

The Federal Reserve's return to money printing raises concerns about the future of the US dollar as a global reserve currency.

user avatarMaria Gutierrez

Bored Ape Yacht Club Faces Criticism After Otherside Metaverse Launch

chest

The Bored Ape Yacht Club launched its metaverse project, Otherside, facing significant technical issues during the NFT collection release.

user avatarArif Mukhtar

Crypto Industry Divided Over Bitcoin's Exclusion from PARITY Act

chest

The exclusion of Bitcoin from the Digital Asset PARITY Act's tax exemption has sparked significant debate within the crypto industry, highlighting divisions between supporters and advocates.

user avatarDavid Robinson

PARITY Act and Lummis Bill Present Divergent Paths for Crypto Taxation

chest

The PARITY Act and the competing Lummis bill differ significantly in their approach to crypto tax exemptions.

user avatarAndrew Smith

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.