• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

Comparison of Pi Network and Ice Open Network: What Users Choose?

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

5 hours ago


Two platforms, Pi Network and Ice Open Network (ION), have emerged as leaders in mobile-accessible cryptocurrencies, offering unique user opportunities. Let's explore their origins, features, and recent achievements.

Origins and Development

The story of Pi Network began in 2019, initiated by Stanford graduates focusing on making cryptocurrency accessible through mobile mining. On February 20, 2025, Pi Network transitioned to an open network after years of development. Ice Open Network, founded in 2023, is a newer player presenting as a Layer-1 blockchain, focusing on data management and digital interaction. A comparative analysis reveals strategic differences: Pi Network aims at mobile mining, while ION focuses on blockchain infrastructure.

Key Features

Ice Open Network ensures scalability and speed, capable of handling 1.2 million transactions per second. The platform offers a toolkit for developing decentralized applications (dApp), supporting digital identity and social platforms. The native coin of the network is ICE. Unlike ION, Pi Network offers a simplified mobile mining experience based on a closed code system, using its PI coin. Approaches to transparency and code vary: ION's open model garners more trust from developers.

User Base and Recent Developments

Pi Network has attracted over 60 million users, while ION has about 40 million, utilizing referral systems. Both platforms actively support user participation through various events and partnerships. To date, both have launched their mainnets and formed significant partnerships. Unlike Pi Network, ION boasts a higher rating by Certik Skynet, indicating good performance in code security and transparency.

ION and Pi Network represent two sides of the same coin in the world of decentralized technology. The choice between platforms depends on needs for transparency, accessibility, and community scaling. Both platforms contribute to blockchain development, pushing its boundaries.

0

Share

Other news

Funding Utila: $18M Series A Raises Questions

Reports suggest Utila raised $18M in Series A. Unverified data raises doubts.

user avatarGiorgi Kostiuk

3 minutes ago

Cardano Faces Potential Price Drop Amidst Market Pressure

Cardano is under market pressure, facing a 30% price drop risk if support is breached.

user avatarGiorgi Kostiuk

4 minutes ago

Tron’s Value Jumps with New Community Projects

Tron surged by 7% in 24 hours due to Justin Sun’s investment in meme tokens and new projects.

user avatarGiorgi Kostiuk

4 minutes ago

Solana Mobile: Breakthrough in Mobile Blockchain Technology

Solana Mobile offers integration with Solana blockchain, dApps, and Web3 features.

user avatarGiorgi Kostiuk

4 minutes ago

South Korea Seeks 10-Year Sentence for Investor's Attack on Haru Invest CEO

South Korean prosecutors seek strict punishment for an investor's attack on Haru Invest's CEO amid fraud allegations.

user avatarGiorgi Kostiuk

9 minutes ago

Bitcoin's Dominance Challenges the Future of Altcoins

Bitcoin's record dominance questions the future of altcoins. Is it the end for altseason? A changing market analysis.

user avatarGiorgi Kostiuk

12 minutes ago

dapp expert logo
© 2020-2025. DappExpert. All rights reserved.
© 2020-2025. DappExpert. All rights reserved.

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.