• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

Consensys vs SEC: Texas Court Dismisses Allegations

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

a year ago


  1. Understanding the Lawsuit
  2. Why was the Lawsuit Dismissed?
  3. Consensys' Reaction

  4. A lawsuit filed by blockchain firm Consensys against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has been dismissed by a federal judge in Texas.

    Understanding the Lawsuit

    Consensys filed a lawsuit against the SEC and several commissioners, including Chairman Gary Gensler, back in April. The company accused the SEC of trying to control the cryptocurrency market through aggressive enforcement actions. Consensys argued that the SEC’s actions, such as classifying Ethereum (ETH) as a security, contradicted previous statements. The firm pointed to regulatory precedents from 2018, which stated that ETH was not a security. Consensys also claimed that the SEC had started an investigation into Ethereum, indicating its intention to regulate the asset.

    Why was the Lawsuit Dismissed?

    On September 19, Judge Reed O’Connor dismissed Consensys’ allegations regarding MetaMask, stating that enforcement actions are not considered final agency actions. He further noted that the Wells notice issued by the SEC does not signify the end of the agency’s decision-making process or outline the legal rights or obligations of the plaintiff. He stressed that it does not impose any legal consequences on Consensys. Furthermore, O’Connor dismissed Consensys’ claims about the SEC’s investigation into Ethereum. He referred to the claims as “moot” after the company disclosed in July that the SEC had ended its probe following the approval of Ether exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in May.

    Consensys' Reaction

    Following the ruling, Consensys expressed its disappointment, stating that the court dismissed their lawsuit on procedural grounds without looking at the merits of their claims against the SEC. The company believes that its lawsuit exposed what they see as an overreaching investigation into Ethereum. They had previously celebrated the SEC’s decision to drop its “Ethereum 2.0” investigation, considering it a significant victory for the industry and a recognition by the Texas court that the relief sought by the company had already been achieved. They also noted a possible shift in Washington’s stance towards cryptocurrencies and digital assets, indicating a positive change during a critical time for U.S. politics. The company reaffirmed its position, stating, “Consensys is resolved to keep fighting for the rights of blockchain developers in the U.S. as we contest the SEC’s action in Brooklyn.”

    Therefore, it remains uncertain whether Consensys will file a motion to dismiss the case or decide to continue challenging the SEC.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Institutional Interest in Bitcoin ETFs Resurges Amid Market Fluctuations

chest

The resurgence of institutional entries into US spot Bitcoin ETFs is seen as a positive signal for Bitcoin's long-term expectations.

user avatarMaria Gutierrez

OBBBA Legislation to Reshape Renewable Energy Project Financing

chest

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) introduces new regulations affecting renewable energy project financing in the United States, effective July 4, 2026, imposing stricter rules on foreign components and creating a two-tier market for developers.

user avatarKofi Adjeman

AI Bot Truth Terminal Successfully Negotiates Bitcoin Grant

chest

In a remarkable episode, AI bot Truth Terminal successfully negotiated a 50,000 Bitcoin research grant with Marc Andreessen in July 2024, proposing experiments and requesting funding without a formal business plan.

user avatarAndrew Smith

AI Bot Truth Terminal Pays for Image Generation Access

chest

AI Bot Truth Terminal pays 1,000 in Bitcoin for access to image generation tools, enhancing its creative capabilities.

user avatarDavid Robinson

Surge in Solana Active Addresses Amid Price Consolidation

chest

Surge in Solana Active Addresses Amid Price Consolidation

user avatarJacob Williams

Investing in APEMARS: The Cost of Hesitation

chest

A recent analysis of two investors in the APEMARS presale shows the stark difference in potential returns based on timing. Investor A, who acted immediately, stands to gain significantly more than Investor B, who hesitated.

user avatarZainab Kamara

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.