• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

Consensys vs SEC: Texas Court Dismisses Allegations

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

a year ago


  1. Understanding the Lawsuit
  2. Why was the Lawsuit Dismissed?
  3. Consensys' Reaction

  4. A lawsuit filed by blockchain firm Consensys against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has been dismissed by a federal judge in Texas.

    Understanding the Lawsuit

    Consensys filed a lawsuit against the SEC and several commissioners, including Chairman Gary Gensler, back in April. The company accused the SEC of trying to control the cryptocurrency market through aggressive enforcement actions. Consensys argued that the SEC’s actions, such as classifying Ethereum (ETH) as a security, contradicted previous statements. The firm pointed to regulatory precedents from 2018, which stated that ETH was not a security. Consensys also claimed that the SEC had started an investigation into Ethereum, indicating its intention to regulate the asset.

    Why was the Lawsuit Dismissed?

    On September 19, Judge Reed O’Connor dismissed Consensys’ allegations regarding MetaMask, stating that enforcement actions are not considered final agency actions. He further noted that the Wells notice issued by the SEC does not signify the end of the agency’s decision-making process or outline the legal rights or obligations of the plaintiff. He stressed that it does not impose any legal consequences on Consensys. Furthermore, O’Connor dismissed Consensys’ claims about the SEC’s investigation into Ethereum. He referred to the claims as “moot” after the company disclosed in July that the SEC had ended its probe following the approval of Ether exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in May.

    Consensys' Reaction

    Following the ruling, Consensys expressed its disappointment, stating that the court dismissed their lawsuit on procedural grounds without looking at the merits of their claims against the SEC. The company believes that its lawsuit exposed what they see as an overreaching investigation into Ethereum. They had previously celebrated the SEC’s decision to drop its “Ethereum 2.0” investigation, considering it a significant victory for the industry and a recognition by the Texas court that the relief sought by the company had already been achieved. They also noted a possible shift in Washington’s stance towards cryptocurrencies and digital assets, indicating a positive change during a critical time for U.S. politics. The company reaffirmed its position, stating, “Consensys is resolved to keep fighting for the rights of blockchain developers in the U.S. as we contest the SEC’s action in Brooklyn.”

    Therefore, it remains uncertain whether Consensys will file a motion to dismiss the case or decide to continue challenging the SEC.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Institutional Ownership of ETHA Rises Amidst Volatile Ethereum Prices

chest

Institutional ownership of the iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) has increased throughout 2025, despite volatility in Ethereum's price.

user avatarAndrew Smith

NeuralAI Unveils Next Generation of Virtual Experience Infrastructure

chest

NeuralAI is developing a comprehensive suite for 3D content creation, enhancing collaboration and efficiency in digital environments.

user avatarJacob Williams

Zhang Zhengwen Addresses NEO's Financial Transparency and Future Plans

chest

Zhang Zhengwen addressed issues of asset transparency and outlined NEO's future development plans, emphasizing the need for clarity in financial matters and focusing on technical advancements and ecosystem growth.

user avatarSon Min-ho

NEO Founders Clash Over Governance and Transparency Issues

chest

A public dispute has erupted between NEO's founders regarding the management of the project and transparency of its assets.

user avatarZainab Kamara

Internal Conflict Erupts in XRP Community

chest

A loud internal conflict has erupted in the XRP community, with Zach Rector accusing Jake Claver of misleading narratives regarding XRP prices, leading to calls for transparency and accountability.

user avatarAyman Ben Youssef

Vitalik Buterin Proposes Gas Fee Futures for Ethereum Stability

chest

Vitalik Buterin proposes gas fee futures for Ethereum to enhance transaction cost predictability.

user avatarTando Nkube

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.