• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

DefiLlama vs. Artemis Dispute: Data Ownership and Ethics in Web3

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

a year ago


The recent dispute between DefiLlama and Artemis highlighted the importance of ethical data handling in the Web3 and DeFi spheres. Accusations of data use without proper attribution have stirred significant discussion.

Artemis used DeFiLlama’s data without attribution

A DefiLlama developer, @0xngmi, accused Artemis of using DefiLlama's data without proper attribution. In a tweet that went viral, @0xngmi claimed that a competitor was using the same data from DefiLlama’s database. To verify this, they uploaded random numbers into a dead protocol database and found the same data appeared on Artemis under their name.

This is a bug in our attribution system, we’ve attributed to DefiLlama in other places but missed a few cases, which will be fixed soon.Crystal Tai

Artemis's response

In response, Crystal Tai, an engineer at Artemis, claimed the attribution issue was due to a bug and that they have properly referenced DefiLlama in other instances. Artemis released a statement confirming the misattribution and reassured that corrections are in progress.

Open-source projects are vulnerable to data misuse

The incident with DefiLlama has shed light on how open-source projects can be vulnerable to improper data use. Despite Artemis’s assurances of no malicious intent, critics argue that such incidents undermine trust and highlight the need for more ethical data handling.

The DefiLlama vs. Artemis dispute underscored the significance of transparency and ethics in data handling within DeFi and Web3. As decentralization advances, proper data use remains a key concern.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Congress Proposes AI Kill Switch Legislation

chest

Congress members propose the AI Kill Switch Act to give the federal government authority to shut down AI models.

user avatarEmily Carter

Frax Governance Discusses Proposal for Early Redemptions from Locked Ethereum Pools

chest

Frax governance is discussing a proposal for early redemptions from locked Ethereum pools with a 4% penalty fee directed to the Frax treasury.

user avatarTomas Novak

Frax Governance Proposes Morpho Lending Market for bdUSD and frxUSD

chest

Frax governance is discussing a proposal to create a Morpho lending market for bdUSD and frxUSD to enhance stablecoin liquidity and borrowing demand.

user avatarKaterina Papadopoulou

EigenLayers Forum Engages in ELIP018 Proposal Discussion

chest

The EigenLayers forum is currently engaged in a debate over the draft proposal ELIP018, which introduces a framework known as RETIRE, aimed at providing a terminal exit route for restakers.

user avatarMaya Lundqvist

Uniswap Governance Explores Private Execution Path for Swaps

chest

Uniswap governance is discussing a proposal for an optional private execution path for swaps to enhance user privacy and reduce transaction information exposure.

user avatarLeo van der Veen

Kraken Introduces USDT0 Support on Tempo Network

chest

Kraken has introduced support for USDT0 deposits and withdrawals on the Tempo network, enhancing stablecoin liquidity movement.

user avatarLi Weicheng

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.