• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

Dencun Upgrade: Challenges for Ethereum Layer 2 Networks

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

a year ago


  1. Ethereum Layer 2 Networks Face Challenges
  2. Solana Faces Similar Woes
  3. Conclusions and Implications

  4. The Dencun upgrade in March 2024 was a significant milestone for Ethereum, but it also brought about unforeseen challenges, particularly for Layer 2 networks.

    Ethereum Layer 2 Networks Face Challenges

    Christine Kim, a researcher at Galaxy, highlighted that this upgrade inadvertently led to an increase in transaction failures across these networks. In her August 21 analysis titled '150 Days After Dencun,' Kim revealed that since the activation of EIP-4844, Ethereum L2’s daily transactions more than doubled, growing by 6.65 million within 150 days. However, this increase in transaction activity has also been accompanied by a higher rate of failures, which Kim attributes to bot activity driven by the reduced fees. Most of the transaction failures are linked to highly active addresses, which are likely bots. The low fees on L2s may be encouraging this spike in bot activity. For average users with normal transaction volumes, the failure rates are only slightly higher than they were before the Dencun upgrade. Research showed that Arbitrum, Base, and OP Mainnet have encountered notable increases in the proportion of failed transactions. Base saw its failure rate climb to 21%, Arbitrum to 15.4%, and OP Mainnet to 10.4% within 150 days following Dencun. On the other hand, the low-activity addresses with five or fewer daily transactions saw a maximum failure rate of 4.02% across all networks. OP Mainnet’s failure rate for these addresses decreased since March 13, 2024, while Base’s rate has only slightly increased. Interestingly, Arbitrum’s failure rate for low-activity addresses surged by 545% post-Dencun.

    Solana Faces Similar Woes

    Transaction failure rates are not only restricted to Layer 2 networks. In fact, the popular Layer 1 network, Solana, also has a high rate of transaction failure. In its recent report, Coinbase stated that of all Solana non-vote transaction fees, between 25% and 45% are spent on failed transactions.

    Conclusions and Implications

    The reduction in rollup transaction costs and the rise in failures among high-activity addresses suggest that bot activity is likely driving the increased failure rates on these rollups, as per the researcher. The current situation underscores the necessity of exploring new solutions to reduce transaction failure rates and enhance network efficiency.

    Thus, the Dencun upgrade has led to significant changes in Ethereum Layer 2 networks, necessitating further analysis and the development of solutions to reduce failed transactions.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

X Takes Action Against Spam and Automation

chest

X's leadership is taking steps to combat spam and automation on the platform.

user avatarNguyen Van Long

X to Launch Smart Cashtags Feature for Direct Trading

chest

X's new Smart Cashtags feature will allow users to trade cryptocurrencies and stocks directly from their timeline.

user avatarSatoshi Nakamura

Capitulation Signal in Memecoin Market

chest

Santiment reports that the memecoin sector is showing signs of capitulation, indicating a potential turning point.

user avatarJesper Sørensen

Memecoins Experience Significant Market Decline

chest

The memecoin market has seen a sharp decline, with a total market capitalization drop of 34% over the past month.

user avatarRajesh Kumar

Experts Urge Action on Quantum Threats to Bitcoin Security

chest

Experts discuss the urgency of addressing quantum computing risks to Bitcoin's security.

user avatarLucas Weissmann

Tensions Rise Between Bitcoin Holders and Developers Over Quantum Threats

chest

Tensions are rising between significant Bitcoin holders and developers over concerns regarding quantum threats to the network, with potential shifts towards a more centralized development approach.

user avatarFilippo Romano

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.