In 2024, Dubai-based investor and promoter Sahil Arora executed a series of high-profile token schemes involving celebrities. Leveraging his extensive audience and connections, Arora reportedly generated substantial profits through pump-and-dump schemes.
The Essence of the Schemes
According to reports, Arora issued tokens tied to well-known figures such as Caitlyn Jenner, Floyd Mayweather, Amber Rose, Sunny Leone, and Iggy Azalea. Using a platform called Pump Fun, he orchestrated a campaign that included direct messages to celebrities, offering them significant payments in exchange for promoting the token. The core of Arora's scheme involved manipulating the token's price through hype and celebrity endorsements. Once the token was launched and its price was artificially inflated through celebrity tweets, Arora, who held a substantial portion of the token’s supply, sold off his holdings. This rapid selling caused the token’s value to plummet, leaving other investors with nearly worthless assets.
Financial Details and Discrepancies
Arora’s methods were lucrative. Reports from Bubblemaps indicate that he earned around $30 million through these schemes in 2024. The monthly earnings reportedly fluctuated: $3 million in January, $1.8 million in February, $3.2 million in March, $2.5 million in April, $4.8 million in May, $2.5 million in June, $2 million in July, and a staggering $6.6 million in August. However, independent blockchain sleuth ZachXBT disputes these figures, suggesting that they were inflated due to an error involving incorrectly attributing a Poloniex wallet address to Arora. ZachXBT estimates that Arora’s actual earnings were likely between $2 and $3 million.
Consequences for Celebrities
Celebrities involved in these schemes often face scrutiny and legal issues. While some promote tokens for financial gain, the true value and legitimacy of these projects are frequently questionable.
Sahil Arora managed to earn significant sums through his token schemes with celebrities, but the actual extent of his earnings remains disputed. While such schemes can be profitable for their organizers, they often leave investors facing significant losses.
Comments