Legal Battle Between New York Times and OpenAI Takes a Peculiar Turn

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

2 years ago

Made with AI


An ongoing legal dispute between the renowned publisher New York Times (NYT) and artificial intelligence (AI) firm OpenAI entered a new phase on July 1. OpenAI made a request to the court that the publisher substantiate the originality of its articles by presenting detailed source materials for each copyrighted work. The NYT accused OpenAI of utilizing its articles to train AI models without permission or compensation, while OpenAI defended its use by stating that the materials were gathered fairly from internet sources.

OpenAI, as reported by TorrentFreak, filed a petition on July 1 in a U.S. court in New York requesting the judge to instruct the NYT to provide evidence demonstrating the originality of their copyrighted works. This request seemingly covers a broad spectrum of articles published by the NYT that may have been available online.

Furthermore, OpenAI requested that the NYT furnish comprehensive information regarding the authorship process for each article. OpenAI's legal team highlighted that the NYT invested significant resources in creating their works, including in-depth investigations into various public interest areas over extended periods. Therefore, OpenAI argued that they have the right to explore similar details through the discovery process.

In response to OpenAI's request, the legal representatives of the New York Times submitted a rebuttal on July 3, expressing their opposition to the demand and urging the judge to reject it. The NYT's lawyers asserted that OpenAI's claim for access to all documentation related to the creation of each work, to verify their protectable intellectual property, is unprecedented and contrary to copyright law principles.

The New York Times' motion to dismiss emphasizes that the method of creating copyrighted material is irrelevant to its use in the present case. As of the latest available information, no additional documents have been disclosed to the public. The outcome of this legal battle and the judge's response to the conflicting motions are yet to be determined.

Tier I

Sector: #18291

Sealed Cache Room

Resource Cache

Resource Cache

Tier I

Requires 25% Tier Progress to Claim
Meme Cache

Meme Cache

Tier I

Requires 50% Tier Progress to Claim
Equipment Cache

Equipment Cache

Tier I

Requires 75% Tier Progress to Claim

After collecting, caches will be stored in your inventory and can be opened with Keys.

Other news

AI Researchers Reduce Quantum Attack Resource Benchmark by 86 Times

chest

Researchers have reduced the computing resources needed for a potential quantum attack on Bitcoin and Ethereum by 86 times.

user avatarJesper Sørensen

Regulators Urge Faster Cybersecurity Measures in Banking Sector

chest

Regulatory bodies are urging banks to adopt quicker patching and incident response strategies to combat evolving cyber threats.

user avatarRajesh Kumar

Advanced AI Accelerates Cyberattack Risks for Banks

chest

A new paper highlights the increasing threat posed by advanced AI to banks' cybersecurity, emphasizing the need for faster software repairs.

user avatarLucas Weissmann

US Stock Market Faces Turmoil Amid Rising Bond Yields and Oil Prices

chest

The US stock market is facing significant declines due to rising bond yields and increasing oil prices, influenced by geopolitical tensions.

user avatarFilippo Romano

Zoomex Launches World Trading Championship 2026 with Record Prize Pool

chest

Zoomex announces the launch of the World Trading Championship 2026 with a record prize pool of 5,000,000 USDT, featuring an expanded multi-asset competition format.

user avatarEmily Carter

Meta Platforms' Shares Surge Following AI Assistant Launch

chest

Meta Platforms' shares rose over 6% after the launch of its AI assistant, Muse, which helps users manage tasks and goals.

user avatarTomas Novak

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.