Legal Battle Between New York Times and OpenAI Takes a Peculiar Turn

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

2 years ago

Made with AI


An ongoing legal dispute between the renowned publisher New York Times (NYT) and artificial intelligence (AI) firm OpenAI entered a new phase on July 1. OpenAI made a request to the court that the publisher substantiate the originality of its articles by presenting detailed source materials for each copyrighted work. The NYT accused OpenAI of utilizing its articles to train AI models without permission or compensation, while OpenAI defended its use by stating that the materials were gathered fairly from internet sources.

OpenAI, as reported by TorrentFreak, filed a petition on July 1 in a U.S. court in New York requesting the judge to instruct the NYT to provide evidence demonstrating the originality of their copyrighted works. This request seemingly covers a broad spectrum of articles published by the NYT that may have been available online.

Furthermore, OpenAI requested that the NYT furnish comprehensive information regarding the authorship process for each article. OpenAI's legal team highlighted that the NYT invested significant resources in creating their works, including in-depth investigations into various public interest areas over extended periods. Therefore, OpenAI argued that they have the right to explore similar details through the discovery process.

In response to OpenAI's request, the legal representatives of the New York Times submitted a rebuttal on July 3, expressing their opposition to the demand and urging the judge to reject it. The NYT's lawyers asserted that OpenAI's claim for access to all documentation related to the creation of each work, to verify their protectable intellectual property, is unprecedented and contrary to copyright law principles.

The New York Times' motion to dismiss emphasizes that the method of creating copyrighted material is irrelevant to its use in the present case. As of the latest available information, no additional documents have been disclosed to the public. The outcome of this legal battle and the judge's response to the conflicting motions are yet to be determined.

Tier I

Sector: #18291

Sealed Hiding Place Room

Resource Cache

Resource Cache

Tier I

Requires 25% Tier Progress to Claim
Meme Cache

Meme Cache

Tier I

Requires 50% Tier Progress to Claim
Equipment Cache

Equipment Cache

Tier I

Requires 75% Tier Progress to Claim

After collecting, hiding places will be stored in your inventory and can be opened with Keys.

Other news

Colombian Crypto Broker Sentenced to 160 Months for Money Laundering

Colombian crypto broker Leonardo de Jesus Zuluaga Duque sentenced to 160 months for laundering $145 million in drug proceeds through cryptocurrency.

user avatarKaterina Papadopoulou

Birdeye Unveils Peak, a New Terminal for Institutional Crypto Research

Birdeye has launched Peak, a new terminal aimed at institutional crypto researchers, consolidating various data and analysis services into one professional workspace.

user avatarMaya Lundqvist

Google Implements New Advertising Policy for Crypto Providers in UAE

Google has announced new licensing and certification requirements for crypto exchanges and software wallet providers targeting customers in the United Arab Emirates.

user avatarLeo van der Veen

Meta's Board Approves New Class of Nonvoting Stock

Meta's board has approved the creation of Class C nonvoting shares to be distributed to existing Class A and Class B shareholders, effective January 19, 2027.

user avatarLi Weicheng

Meta's Financial Strategy Ensures Founder Control

Meta's financial strategy includes plans to potentially raise hundreds of billions in equity while ensuring Mark Zuckerberg retains control over the company.

user avatarAisha Farooq

BitGo Introduces BitGo Labs to Innovate in AI and Cryptocurrency

BitGo has launched BitGo Labs to develop AI-integrated applications for its digital asset infrastructure, starting with the Gokubu app.

user avatarTenzin Dorje

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.