Legal Battle Between New York Times and OpenAI Takes a Peculiar Turn

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

2 years ago

Made with AI


An ongoing legal dispute between the renowned publisher New York Times (NYT) and artificial intelligence (AI) firm OpenAI entered a new phase on July 1. OpenAI made a request to the court that the publisher substantiate the originality of its articles by presenting detailed source materials for each copyrighted work. The NYT accused OpenAI of utilizing its articles to train AI models without permission or compensation, while OpenAI defended its use by stating that the materials were gathered fairly from internet sources.

OpenAI, as reported by TorrentFreak, filed a petition on July 1 in a U.S. court in New York requesting the judge to instruct the NYT to provide evidence demonstrating the originality of their copyrighted works. This request seemingly covers a broad spectrum of articles published by the NYT that may have been available online.

Furthermore, OpenAI requested that the NYT furnish comprehensive information regarding the authorship process for each article. OpenAI's legal team highlighted that the NYT invested significant resources in creating their works, including in-depth investigations into various public interest areas over extended periods. Therefore, OpenAI argued that they have the right to explore similar details through the discovery process.

In response to OpenAI's request, the legal representatives of the New York Times submitted a rebuttal on July 3, expressing their opposition to the demand and urging the judge to reject it. The NYT's lawyers asserted that OpenAI's claim for access to all documentation related to the creation of each work, to verify their protectable intellectual property, is unprecedented and contrary to copyright law principles.

The New York Times' motion to dismiss emphasizes that the method of creating copyrighted material is irrelevant to its use in the present case. As of the latest available information, no additional documents have been disclosed to the public. The outcome of this legal battle and the judge's response to the conflicting motions are yet to be determined.

Tier I

Sector: #18291

Sealed Cache Room

Resource Cache

Resource Cache

Tier I

Requires 25% Tier Progress to Claim
Meme Cache

Meme Cache

Tier I

Requires 50% Tier Progress to Claim
Equipment Cache

Equipment Cache

Tier I

Requires 75% Tier Progress to Claim

After collecting, caches will be stored in your inventory and can be opened with Keys.

Other news

OpenAI Launches GPT56 Sol Ultrafast, Boosting AI Speed and Efficiency

chest

OpenAI has launched a limited preview of GPT56 Sol Ultrafast, a new service tier that significantly increases the speed of its AI model.

user avatarMiguel Rodriguez

Google Unveils Gemini 37 Flash, Its Most Intelligent AI Model Yet

chest

Google has launched Gemini 37 Flash, an AI model optimized for coding and business workflows, offering significant speed and efficiency improvements.

user avatarRajesh Kumar

UBS Considers Cryptocurrency Trading for Private Banking Clients

chest

UBS is evaluating cryptocurrency trading options for private banking clients in Switzerland, with potential expansion to Asia-Pacific and US markets.

user avatarArif Mukhtar

UBS Significantly Boosts Bitcoin ETF Holdings

chest

UBS has significantly increased its Bitcoin ETF holdings, tripling its stake in BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust to approximately 90 million shares.

user avatarLuis Flores

Alphabet Diversifies Stock Portfolio in Q2 2026

chest

Alphabet has updated its stock portfolio, now owning 28 stocks across various sectors to ensure long-term growth.

user avatarMaria Gutierrez

SpaceX Drops AMD in Favor of Nvidia for AI Projects

chest

SpaceX announced it will exclusively use Nvidia chips for AI projects, dropping AMD, during a quarterly earnings call on August 4, 2023.

user avatarDavid Robinson

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.