• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

Legal Battle Between New York Times and OpenAI Takes a Peculiar Turn

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

2 years ago


An ongoing legal dispute between the renowned publisher New York Times (NYT) and artificial intelligence (AI) firm OpenAI entered a new phase on July 1. OpenAI made a request to the court that the publisher substantiate the originality of its articles by presenting detailed source materials for each copyrighted work. The NYT accused OpenAI of utilizing its articles to train AI models without permission or compensation, while OpenAI defended its use by stating that the materials were gathered fairly from internet sources.

OpenAI, as reported by TorrentFreak, filed a petition on July 1 in a U.S. court in New York requesting the judge to instruct the NYT to provide evidence demonstrating the originality of their copyrighted works. This request seemingly covers a broad spectrum of articles published by the NYT that may have been available online.

Furthermore, OpenAI requested that the NYT furnish comprehensive information regarding the authorship process for each article. OpenAI's legal team highlighted that the NYT invested significant resources in creating their works, including in-depth investigations into various public interest areas over extended periods. Therefore, OpenAI argued that they have the right to explore similar details through the discovery process.

In response to OpenAI's request, the legal representatives of the New York Times submitted a rebuttal on July 3, expressing their opposition to the demand and urging the judge to reject it. The NYT's lawyers asserted that OpenAI's claim for access to all documentation related to the creation of each work, to verify their protectable intellectual property, is unprecedented and contrary to copyright law principles.

The New York Times' motion to dismiss emphasizes that the method of creating copyrighted material is irrelevant to its use in the present case. As of the latest available information, no additional documents have been disclosed to the public. The outcome of this legal battle and the judge's response to the conflicting motions are yet to be determined.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Advanced Forensic Techniques Uncover Bitcoin Wallet's Transaction History

chest

The Hansung University Blockchain Research Institute has successfully employed advanced forensic methodologies to trace the transaction history of a Bitcoin wallet containing 32088 BTC.

user avatarElias Mukuru

South Korean Authorities Recover Lost Bitcoin Wallet Worth 298 Million

chest

South Korean authorities have recovered a lost Bitcoin wallet containing 32088 BTC, valued at approximately 298 million, through blockchain forensic work.

user avatarDiego Alvarez

Senator Marshall Withdraws Swipe Fee Amendment Amid Crypto Regulation Discussions

chest

Senator Roger Marshall has decided not to pursue a controversial amendment regarding swipe fee competition during the upcoming Agriculture Committee markup.

user avatarMaria Fernandez

Igra Network's Galleon Phase Mainnet Launches

chest

Igra Network launched the Galleon phase mainnet in mid-January 2026, creating a closed environment for community node operators and facilitating high testing activity.

user avatarRajesh Kumar

Pi App Studio Launches Creator Event to Collect User Feedback.

chest

Pi App Studio has launched a creator event to collect structured feedback from users, offering 5 Pi credits to the first 1,000 qualified respondents.

user avatarMiguel Rodriguez

Pi Network Introduces Significant Enhancements to App Studio for 2026.

chest

Pi Network has launched significant updates to its App Studio, aimed at enhancing app creation and monetization features.

user avatarArif Mukhtar

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.