• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

Legal Battle Between New York Times and OpenAI Takes a Peculiar Turn

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

2 years ago


An ongoing legal dispute between the renowned publisher New York Times (NYT) and artificial intelligence (AI) firm OpenAI entered a new phase on July 1. OpenAI made a request to the court that the publisher substantiate the originality of its articles by presenting detailed source materials for each copyrighted work. The NYT accused OpenAI of utilizing its articles to train AI models without permission or compensation, while OpenAI defended its use by stating that the materials were gathered fairly from internet sources.

OpenAI, as reported by TorrentFreak, filed a petition on July 1 in a U.S. court in New York requesting the judge to instruct the NYT to provide evidence demonstrating the originality of their copyrighted works. This request seemingly covers a broad spectrum of articles published by the NYT that may have been available online.

Furthermore, OpenAI requested that the NYT furnish comprehensive information regarding the authorship process for each article. OpenAI's legal team highlighted that the NYT invested significant resources in creating their works, including in-depth investigations into various public interest areas over extended periods. Therefore, OpenAI argued that they have the right to explore similar details through the discovery process.

In response to OpenAI's request, the legal representatives of the New York Times submitted a rebuttal on July 3, expressing their opposition to the demand and urging the judge to reject it. The NYT's lawyers asserted that OpenAI's claim for access to all documentation related to the creation of each work, to verify their protectable intellectual property, is unprecedented and contrary to copyright law principles.

The New York Times' motion to dismiss emphasizes that the method of creating copyrighted material is irrelevant to its use in the present case. As of the latest available information, no additional documents have been disclosed to the public. The outcome of this legal battle and the judge's response to the conflicting motions are yet to be determined.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

xAI Challenges Minnesota's AI Nudification Law in Federal Court

chest

xAI, founded by Elon Musk, sues Minnesota AG to block HF 1606, a law regulating AI nudification software, claiming it violates free speech.

user avatarAndrew Smith

Concerns of an AI Bubble Similar to 2008 Housing Crisis

chest

Concerns about a potential AI bubble are being discussed, drawing comparisons to the 2008 housing crisis and the dot-com bubble.

user avatarZainab Kamara

Rising Treasury Yields Impact Stock and Crypto Markets

chest

The recent surge in US 30-year treasury yields is impacting stock and cryptocurrency markets, leading to increased borrowing costs and a preference for safer investments.

user avatarJacob Williams

AI Companies Destroying Books for Training Data Raises Concerns

chest

AI companies are acquiring and destroying physical books to create training datasets, raising concerns about copyright and the preservation of literary works.

user avatarSon Min-ho

Cryptocurrency Scams Account for Over Half of Cybercrime Losses

chest

A report by the Consumer Federation of America reveals that cryptocurrency scams have led to significant financial losses, with estimates reaching 807 billion.

user avatarAyman Ben Youssef

Zcash Launches Ironwood Upgrade to Enhance Security and Privacy

chest

Zcash has launched the Ironwood upgrade to prevent counterfeit coins from entering circulation and to enhance privacy.

user avatarTando Nkube

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.