Legal Battle Between New York Times and OpenAI Takes a Peculiar Turn

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

2 years ago

Made with AI


An ongoing legal dispute between the renowned publisher New York Times (NYT) and artificial intelligence (AI) firm OpenAI entered a new phase on July 1. OpenAI made a request to the court that the publisher substantiate the originality of its articles by presenting detailed source materials for each copyrighted work. The NYT accused OpenAI of utilizing its articles to train AI models without permission or compensation, while OpenAI defended its use by stating that the materials were gathered fairly from internet sources.

OpenAI, as reported by TorrentFreak, filed a petition on July 1 in a U.S. court in New York requesting the judge to instruct the NYT to provide evidence demonstrating the originality of their copyrighted works. This request seemingly covers a broad spectrum of articles published by the NYT that may have been available online.

Furthermore, OpenAI requested that the NYT furnish comprehensive information regarding the authorship process for each article. OpenAI's legal team highlighted that the NYT invested significant resources in creating their works, including in-depth investigations into various public interest areas over extended periods. Therefore, OpenAI argued that they have the right to explore similar details through the discovery process.

In response to OpenAI's request, the legal representatives of the New York Times submitted a rebuttal on July 3, expressing their opposition to the demand and urging the judge to reject it. The NYT's lawyers asserted that OpenAI's claim for access to all documentation related to the creation of each work, to verify their protectable intellectual property, is unprecedented and contrary to copyright law principles.

The New York Times' motion to dismiss emphasizes that the method of creating copyrighted material is irrelevant to its use in the present case. As of the latest available information, no additional documents have been disclosed to the public. The outcome of this legal battle and the judge's response to the conflicting motions are yet to be determined.

Tier I

Sector: #18291

Sealed Hiding Place Room

Resource Cache

Resource Cache

Tier I

Requires 25% Tier Progress to Claim
Meme Cache

Meme Cache

Tier I

Requires 50% Tier Progress to Claim
Equipment Cache

Equipment Cache

Tier I

Requires 75% Tier Progress to Claim

After collecting, hiding places will be stored in your inventory and can be opened with Keys.

Other news

Bitcoin's Long-Term Outlook Remains Encouraging

Bitcoin's established network and limited supply contribute to a positive long-term outlook despite recent declines.

user avatarGustavo Mendoza

Potential Recovery for Bitcoin Above Key Resistance Levels

Bitcoin could regain momentum if it surpasses critical resistance levels, with targets set at 81,300 and beyond.

user avatarMaria Fernandez

Gate Reports Impressive Cold Storage Coverage Ratio

Gate's cold storage coverage ratio reached an impressive 104.58%, ensuring all user assets are secure.

user avatarRajesh Kumar

Gate Launches Innovative Proof of Security Framework

Gate has launched a new asset security verification framework called Proof of Security (PoSEC), becoming the first digital asset trading platform to implement such a system.

user avatarMiguel Rodriguez

US DOJ Launches Task Force to Combat AI Misuse

The US Department of Justice has launched a task force to combat the misuse of advanced artificial intelligence, ensuring American leadership is not compromised by bad actors.

user avatarLuis Flores

Mercado Bitcoin Suffers Major Security Breach with $48 Million Stolen

Mercado Bitcoin has reported a significant security breach, with over $48 million in assets stolen across 11 blockchains. The breach occurred on November 2, 2023, challenging the exchange's claims of containment.

user avatarArif Mukhtar

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.