• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

Legal Battle Between New York Times and OpenAI Takes a Peculiar Turn

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

2 years ago

Made with AI


An ongoing legal dispute between the renowned publisher New York Times (NYT) and artificial intelligence (AI) firm OpenAI entered a new phase on July 1. OpenAI made a request to the court that the publisher substantiate the originality of its articles by presenting detailed source materials for each copyrighted work. The NYT accused OpenAI of utilizing its articles to train AI models without permission or compensation, while OpenAI defended its use by stating that the materials were gathered fairly from internet sources.

OpenAI, as reported by TorrentFreak, filed a petition on July 1 in a U.S. court in New York requesting the judge to instruct the NYT to provide evidence demonstrating the originality of their copyrighted works. This request seemingly covers a broad spectrum of articles published by the NYT that may have been available online.

Furthermore, OpenAI requested that the NYT furnish comprehensive information regarding the authorship process for each article. OpenAI's legal team highlighted that the NYT invested significant resources in creating their works, including in-depth investigations into various public interest areas over extended periods. Therefore, OpenAI argued that they have the right to explore similar details through the discovery process.

In response to OpenAI's request, the legal representatives of the New York Times submitted a rebuttal on July 3, expressing their opposition to the demand and urging the judge to reject it. The NYT's lawyers asserted that OpenAI's claim for access to all documentation related to the creation of each work, to verify their protectable intellectual property, is unprecedented and contrary to copyright law principles.

The New York Times' motion to dismiss emphasizes that the method of creating copyrighted material is irrelevant to its use in the present case. As of the latest available information, no additional documents have been disclosed to the public. The outcome of this legal battle and the judge's response to the conflicting motions are yet to be determined.

chest
chest
chest

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

ARK Invest CEO Advocates for Bitcoin Over Gold

chest

Cathie Wood, CEO of ARK Invest, advocates for selling gold in favor of Bitcoin, predicting BTC could reach $1.5 million.

user avatarGustavo Mendoza

Ninth Circuit Court Rules in Favor of Perplexity's AI Shopping Tools

chest

A federal appeals court has ruled in favor of Perplexity, allowing its AI shopping tools to operate on Amazon, overturning a preliminary injunction that blocked them.

user avatarRajesh Kumar

SanDisk Stock Reclaims 1,400 Level Amid Bullish Predictions

chest

SanDisk stock has reclaimed the 1,400 level, closing at 1,427 after a low of 998 during the July crash, attracting bullish predictions from Wall Street.

user avatarMiguel Rodriguez

China's New Digital Payment System Aims to Challenge US Dollar

chest

China is developing a digital payment infrastructure to facilitate cross-border trade without relying on the US dollar, aiming for dedollarization and financial sovereignty.

user avatarLuis Flores

Emergence of New Luddite Movement Against AI Data Centers

chest

Tennessee state Rep Justin Pearson has emerged as a leading voice in the New Luddite movement, advocating for moratoriums on data centers and stricter oversight of AI technology.

user avatarArif Mukhtar

Nationwide Protests Against AI Data Centers Lead to Arrests

chest

At least 37 individuals have been arrested during protests against AI data centers across the United States this year.

user avatarMaria Gutierrez

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.