• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

Legal Battle Between New York Times and OpenAI Takes a Peculiar Turn

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

a year ago


An ongoing legal dispute between the renowned publisher New York Times (NYT) and artificial intelligence (AI) firm OpenAI entered a new phase on July 1. OpenAI made a request to the court that the publisher substantiate the originality of its articles by presenting detailed source materials for each copyrighted work. The NYT accused OpenAI of utilizing its articles to train AI models without permission or compensation, while OpenAI defended its use by stating that the materials were gathered fairly from internet sources.

OpenAI, as reported by TorrentFreak, filed a petition on July 1 in a U.S. court in New York requesting the judge to instruct the NYT to provide evidence demonstrating the originality of their copyrighted works. This request seemingly covers a broad spectrum of articles published by the NYT that may have been available online.

Furthermore, OpenAI requested that the NYT furnish comprehensive information regarding the authorship process for each article. OpenAI's legal team highlighted that the NYT invested significant resources in creating their works, including in-depth investigations into various public interest areas over extended periods. Therefore, OpenAI argued that they have the right to explore similar details through the discovery process.

In response to OpenAI's request, the legal representatives of the New York Times submitted a rebuttal on July 3, expressing their opposition to the demand and urging the judge to reject it. The NYT's lawyers asserted that OpenAI's claim for access to all documentation related to the creation of each work, to verify their protectable intellectual property, is unprecedented and contrary to copyright law principles.

The New York Times' motion to dismiss emphasizes that the method of creating copyrighted material is irrelevant to its use in the present case. As of the latest available information, no additional documents have been disclosed to the public. The outcome of this legal battle and the judge's response to the conflicting motions are yet to be determined.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Gold and Silver Prices Rise as Investors Flee to Safety

chest

Gold and silver prices have risen as investors seek safe-haven assets amid declines in the cryptocurrency market.

user avatarLuis Flores

Cantor Fitzgerald's Initiatives Signal Broader Financial Acceptance of Bitcoin

chest

Cantor Fitzgerald's engagement with Bitcoin parallels prior Bitcoin Spot ETFs, indicating a significant shift towards financial acceptance.

user avatarEmily Carter

Vitalik Buterin Signs Trustless Manifesto to Uphold Decentralization

chest

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has signed the Trustless Manifesto, promoting decentralization and cautioning against the integration of intermediaries in crypto platforms.

user avatarMaria Gutierrez

Matt Hougan Predicts Crypto Market Boom in 2026

chest

Bitwise's chief investment officer, Matt Hougan, predicts a significant crypto market boom in 2026, driven by strong fundamentals and ongoing interest in Bitcoin and decentralized finance.

user avatarJacob Williams

US Government Shutdown Ends, Bitcoin Demand Remains Low

chest

Despite the end of the US government shutdown, Bitcoin demand continues to decline, with significant outflows from Bitcoin ETFs.

user avatarDavid Robinson

JP Morgan's AI-Driven Bond Sales Forecast Misunderstood

chest

Recent reports suggest JP Morgan predicts an $18 trillion surge in AI-driven bond sales by 2026, but lack evidence linking to cryptocurrency.

user avatarAndrew Smith

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.