• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

Legal Battle Between New York Times and OpenAI Takes a Peculiar Turn

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

2 years ago


An ongoing legal dispute between the renowned publisher New York Times (NYT) and artificial intelligence (AI) firm OpenAI entered a new phase on July 1. OpenAI made a request to the court that the publisher substantiate the originality of its articles by presenting detailed source materials for each copyrighted work. The NYT accused OpenAI of utilizing its articles to train AI models without permission or compensation, while OpenAI defended its use by stating that the materials were gathered fairly from internet sources.

OpenAI, as reported by TorrentFreak, filed a petition on July 1 in a U.S. court in New York requesting the judge to instruct the NYT to provide evidence demonstrating the originality of their copyrighted works. This request seemingly covers a broad spectrum of articles published by the NYT that may have been available online.

Furthermore, OpenAI requested that the NYT furnish comprehensive information regarding the authorship process for each article. OpenAI's legal team highlighted that the NYT invested significant resources in creating their works, including in-depth investigations into various public interest areas over extended periods. Therefore, OpenAI argued that they have the right to explore similar details through the discovery process.

In response to OpenAI's request, the legal representatives of the New York Times submitted a rebuttal on July 3, expressing their opposition to the demand and urging the judge to reject it. The NYT's lawyers asserted that OpenAI's claim for access to all documentation related to the creation of each work, to verify their protectable intellectual property, is unprecedented and contrary to copyright law principles.

The New York Times' motion to dismiss emphasizes that the method of creating copyrighted material is irrelevant to its use in the present case. As of the latest available information, no additional documents have been disclosed to the public. The outcome of this legal battle and the judge's response to the conflicting motions are yet to be determined.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Bitcoin's 200-Week Moving Average Remains a Key Support Level

chest

Bitcoin's 200-week moving average is at 61,700, a crucial support level for traders, indicating potential recovery if maintained.

user avatarAyman Ben Youssef

Arthur Hayes Sells Off HYPE Token and NEAR Protocol Positions

chest

Arthur Hayes, cofounder of BitMEX, has exited his positions in HYPE and NEAR, citing macroeconomic factors.

user avatarTando Nkube

Coinbase Introduces Perpetual Futures for Pre-IPO Trading

chest

Coinbase has launched a new perpetual futures product for pre-IPO trading, starting with SpaceX, allowing users outside the US to trade 24/7 using USDC.

user avatarKofi Adjeman

Worldcoin's Short Overhang Could Lead to Price Surge

chest

Worldcoin (WLD) is experiencing a significant short overhang, which may lead to sharp price movements if market conditions change.

user avatarJesper Sørensen

Arthur Hayes Promotes Worldcoin as a Key Player in Upcoming AI IPOs

chest

Arthur Hayes promotes Worldcoin (WLD) as a key player in upcoming AI IPOs, suggesting it could see significant price increases due to its potential as an overlooked investment in the AI sector.

user avatarNguyen Van Long

House of Lords Urges Review of Stablecoin Regulations to Maintain UK Competitiveness

chest

The House of Lords Financial Services Regulation Committee has urged financial regulators to reconsider their stablecoin proposals, warning that the UK risks falling behind global leaders if regulations are not properly calibrated.

user avatarSatoshi Nakamura

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.