• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

Legal Battle Between New York Times and OpenAI Takes a Peculiar Turn

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

2 years ago


An ongoing legal dispute between the renowned publisher New York Times (NYT) and artificial intelligence (AI) firm OpenAI entered a new phase on July 1. OpenAI made a request to the court that the publisher substantiate the originality of its articles by presenting detailed source materials for each copyrighted work. The NYT accused OpenAI of utilizing its articles to train AI models without permission or compensation, while OpenAI defended its use by stating that the materials were gathered fairly from internet sources.

OpenAI, as reported by TorrentFreak, filed a petition on July 1 in a U.S. court in New York requesting the judge to instruct the NYT to provide evidence demonstrating the originality of their copyrighted works. This request seemingly covers a broad spectrum of articles published by the NYT that may have been available online.

Furthermore, OpenAI requested that the NYT furnish comprehensive information regarding the authorship process for each article. OpenAI's legal team highlighted that the NYT invested significant resources in creating their works, including in-depth investigations into various public interest areas over extended periods. Therefore, OpenAI argued that they have the right to explore similar details through the discovery process.

In response to OpenAI's request, the legal representatives of the New York Times submitted a rebuttal on July 3, expressing their opposition to the demand and urging the judge to reject it. The NYT's lawyers asserted that OpenAI's claim for access to all documentation related to the creation of each work, to verify their protectable intellectual property, is unprecedented and contrary to copyright law principles.

The New York Times' motion to dismiss emphasizes that the method of creating copyrighted material is irrelevant to its use in the present case. As of the latest available information, no additional documents have been disclosed to the public. The outcome of this legal battle and the judge's response to the conflicting motions are yet to be determined.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Three Reasons Why RLUSD Cannot Replace XRP, According to Shah

chest

Three reasons why RLUSD cannot serve as a universal routing asset like XRP, according to Sagar Shah.

user avatarEmily Carter

Shah Explains the Distinction Between RLUSD and XRP Using a Playground Analogy

chest

Shah uses a playground trading analogy to illustrate the different roles of RLUSD and XRP in facilitating trades.

user avatarLucas Weissmann

Evernorth's Sagar Shah Clarifies Roles of RLUSD and XRP

chest

Sagar Shah, Chief Business Officer of Evernorth, clarifies that RLUSD is a digital dollar while XRP serves as a neutral routing asset for cross-asset settlement.

user avatarFilippo Romano

Hyperliquid Overtakes Solana in Market Valuation

chest

Hyperliquid has recently surpassed Solana in fully diluted valuation, highlighting the rise of revenue-generating chains in the cryptocurrency market.

user avatarTomas Novak

Qivalis Consortium Secures Support for Europe-Pegged Stablecoin Initiative

chest

The Qivalis consortium has secured support from 37 European banks for a Europe-pegged stablecoin initiative to enhance the competitiveness of Europe's digital assets market.

user avatarKaterina Papadopoulou

European Commission Initiates Consultation on Crypto Regulation

chest

The European Commission has launched a consultation to review the EU's regulatory framework on crypto assets, known as the Markets in CryptoAssets Regulation (MiCA), to gather feedback from stakeholders and the public.

user avatarMaya Lundqvist

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.