• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

Legal Battle Between New York Times and OpenAI Takes a Peculiar Turn

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

2 years ago


An ongoing legal dispute between the renowned publisher New York Times (NYT) and artificial intelligence (AI) firm OpenAI entered a new phase on July 1. OpenAI made a request to the court that the publisher substantiate the originality of its articles by presenting detailed source materials for each copyrighted work. The NYT accused OpenAI of utilizing its articles to train AI models without permission or compensation, while OpenAI defended its use by stating that the materials were gathered fairly from internet sources.

OpenAI, as reported by TorrentFreak, filed a petition on July 1 in a U.S. court in New York requesting the judge to instruct the NYT to provide evidence demonstrating the originality of their copyrighted works. This request seemingly covers a broad spectrum of articles published by the NYT that may have been available online.

Furthermore, OpenAI requested that the NYT furnish comprehensive information regarding the authorship process for each article. OpenAI's legal team highlighted that the NYT invested significant resources in creating their works, including in-depth investigations into various public interest areas over extended periods. Therefore, OpenAI argued that they have the right to explore similar details through the discovery process.

In response to OpenAI's request, the legal representatives of the New York Times submitted a rebuttal on July 3, expressing their opposition to the demand and urging the judge to reject it. The NYT's lawyers asserted that OpenAI's claim for access to all documentation related to the creation of each work, to verify their protectable intellectual property, is unprecedented and contrary to copyright law principles.

The New York Times' motion to dismiss emphasizes that the method of creating copyrighted material is irrelevant to its use in the present case. As of the latest available information, no additional documents have been disclosed to the public. The outcome of this legal battle and the judge's response to the conflicting motions are yet to be determined.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Solana's Quantum Readiness Strategy Under Scrutiny

chest

Solana's quantum readiness strategy is under scrutiny following Anatoly Yakovenko's comments on the need for a multi-scheme approach to enhance security against AI threats.

user avatarLeo van der Veen

South Korean Exchanges Win Temporary Relief from Regulatory Sanctions

chest

Three major South Korean crypto exchanges, Upbit, Bithumb, and Coinone, have secured temporary court relief from sanctions related to existing anti-money laundering requirements.

user avatarLi Weicheng

Anatoly Yakovenko Raises Concerns Over AI's Impact on Post-Quantum Cryptography

chest

Solana cofounder Anatoly Yakovenko warns that AI could expose vulnerabilities in post-quantum signature schemes, emphasizing the need for a robust security design.

user avatarMaya Lundqvist

DAXA Challenges New Anti-Money Laundering Regulations in South Korea

chest

DAXA opposes proposed changes to South Korea's anti-money laundering regulations, citing concerns over excessive reporting requirements.

user avatarAisha Farooq

MoneyGram's Stablecoin Service Expands to Colombia and El Salvador

chest

MoneyGram has launched its stablecoin service in Colombia and expanded to El Salvador, providing financial solutions for underserved markets in Latin America.

user avatarTenzin Dorje

Stellar Network Surpasses 1 Billion in Real-World Assets

chest

The Stellar network has crossed the 1 billion mark in real-world assets, indicating significant growth and momentum.

user avatarBayarjavkhlan Ganbaatar

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.