• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

Legal Battle Between New York Times and OpenAI Takes a Peculiar Turn

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

2 years ago


An ongoing legal dispute between the renowned publisher New York Times (NYT) and artificial intelligence (AI) firm OpenAI entered a new phase on July 1. OpenAI made a request to the court that the publisher substantiate the originality of its articles by presenting detailed source materials for each copyrighted work. The NYT accused OpenAI of utilizing its articles to train AI models without permission or compensation, while OpenAI defended its use by stating that the materials were gathered fairly from internet sources.

OpenAI, as reported by TorrentFreak, filed a petition on July 1 in a U.S. court in New York requesting the judge to instruct the NYT to provide evidence demonstrating the originality of their copyrighted works. This request seemingly covers a broad spectrum of articles published by the NYT that may have been available online.

Furthermore, OpenAI requested that the NYT furnish comprehensive information regarding the authorship process for each article. OpenAI's legal team highlighted that the NYT invested significant resources in creating their works, including in-depth investigations into various public interest areas over extended periods. Therefore, OpenAI argued that they have the right to explore similar details through the discovery process.

In response to OpenAI's request, the legal representatives of the New York Times submitted a rebuttal on July 3, expressing their opposition to the demand and urging the judge to reject it. The NYT's lawyers asserted that OpenAI's claim for access to all documentation related to the creation of each work, to verify their protectable intellectual property, is unprecedented and contrary to copyright law principles.

The New York Times' motion to dismiss emphasizes that the method of creating copyrighted material is irrelevant to its use in the present case. As of the latest available information, no additional documents have been disclosed to the public. The outcome of this legal battle and the judge's response to the conflicting motions are yet to be determined.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

CFTC Adopts Flexible Approach to Event Contracts in Coordination with SEC

chest

CFTC adopts a flexible approach to event contracts, aligning with SEC to support innovation in prediction markets.

user avatarLucas Weissmann

Concerns Over Quantum Computing Heighten Bitcoin Investor Anxiety

chest

Concerns over quantum computing are raising anxiety among Bitcoin investors as Coinbase evaluates risks and Jefferies removes Bitcoin from its portfolio.

user avatarLeo van der Veen

ICE Disputes Have Previously Sparked Major Shutdowns

chest

Historically, US government shutdowns have evolved from DHS-immigration disputes, causing substantial disruptions.

user avatarFilippo Romano

Government Shutdown Looms as Funding Bill Fails

chest

The failure to pass the funding bill threatens a partial government shutdown, affecting sectors such as DHS and ICE operations.

user avatarEmily Carter

Users Earn 4,000 Tokens for Correct Answer in Beetz Daily Task

chest

Users earn 4,000 tokens for correct answers in Beetz Daily Task.

user avatarMohamed Farouk

Lighter EVM's Technical Architecture: Optimizing Blockchain Transactions

chest

Lighter EVM utilizes an optimistic rollup framework to enhance transaction throughput and reduce costs while maintaining security.

user avatarKaterina Papadopoulou

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.