• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

Legal Battle Between New York Times and OpenAI Takes a Peculiar Turn

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

a year ago


An ongoing legal dispute between the renowned publisher New York Times (NYT) and artificial intelligence (AI) firm OpenAI entered a new phase on July 1. OpenAI made a request to the court that the publisher substantiate the originality of its articles by presenting detailed source materials for each copyrighted work. The NYT accused OpenAI of utilizing its articles to train AI models without permission or compensation, while OpenAI defended its use by stating that the materials were gathered fairly from internet sources.

OpenAI, as reported by TorrentFreak, filed a petition on July 1 in a U.S. court in New York requesting the judge to instruct the NYT to provide evidence demonstrating the originality of their copyrighted works. This request seemingly covers a broad spectrum of articles published by the NYT that may have been available online.

Furthermore, OpenAI requested that the NYT furnish comprehensive information regarding the authorship process for each article. OpenAI's legal team highlighted that the NYT invested significant resources in creating their works, including in-depth investigations into various public interest areas over extended periods. Therefore, OpenAI argued that they have the right to explore similar details through the discovery process.

In response to OpenAI's request, the legal representatives of the New York Times submitted a rebuttal on July 3, expressing their opposition to the demand and urging the judge to reject it. The NYT's lawyers asserted that OpenAI's claim for access to all documentation related to the creation of each work, to verify their protectable intellectual property, is unprecedented and contrary to copyright law principles.

The New York Times' motion to dismiss emphasizes that the method of creating copyrighted material is irrelevant to its use in the present case. As of the latest available information, no additional documents have been disclosed to the public. The outcome of this legal battle and the judge's response to the conflicting motions are yet to be determined.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Gate Swap Launches 3,000,000 GM Prize Event

chest

Gate Swap has launched a prize pool event offering 3,000,000 GM tokens with daily airdrops and base rewards from December 19 to 27.

user avatarKaterina Papadopoulou

Boosted Staking Rewards Target Ecosystem Growth

chest

The Eigen Foundation's proposal aims to boost EIGEN token emissions to enhance staking rewards and accelerate ecosystem growth.

user avatarLi Weicheng

Eigen Foundation Proposes Increase in EIGEN Token Emission Rate

chest

The Eigen Foundation has proposed to increase the annual inflation rate of EIGEN tokens from 4% to 8% by late August 2025, pending governance approval.

user avatarLeo van der Veen

Federal Reserve Introduces Proposal for Skinny Master Accounts

chest

The Federal Reserve has announced a plan to introduce skinny master accounts to enhance payment systems for eligible institutions, seeking public input ahead of a formal proposal expected by Q4 2026.

user avatarMaya Lundqvist

Bhutan Commits 10,000 Bitcoin to Gelephu Mindfulness City Project

chest

Bhutan has announced a significant investment in Bitcoin to support its new economic initiative.

user avatarTenzin Dorje

Abundant Mines Launches Innovative Hashrate Redirect Program for Bitcoin Miners

chest

Abundant Mines has launched the Hashrate Redirect program to fairly compensate Bitcoin miners for downtime by redirecting actual mining output instead of offering hosting credits.

user avatarAisha Farooq

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.