Legal Battle Between New York Times and OpenAI Takes a Peculiar Turn

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

2 years ago

Made with AI


An ongoing legal dispute between the renowned publisher New York Times (NYT) and artificial intelligence (AI) firm OpenAI entered a new phase on July 1. OpenAI made a request to the court that the publisher substantiate the originality of its articles by presenting detailed source materials for each copyrighted work. The NYT accused OpenAI of utilizing its articles to train AI models without permission or compensation, while OpenAI defended its use by stating that the materials were gathered fairly from internet sources.

OpenAI, as reported by TorrentFreak, filed a petition on July 1 in a U.S. court in New York requesting the judge to instruct the NYT to provide evidence demonstrating the originality of their copyrighted works. This request seemingly covers a broad spectrum of articles published by the NYT that may have been available online.

Furthermore, OpenAI requested that the NYT furnish comprehensive information regarding the authorship process for each article. OpenAI's legal team highlighted that the NYT invested significant resources in creating their works, including in-depth investigations into various public interest areas over extended periods. Therefore, OpenAI argued that they have the right to explore similar details through the discovery process.

In response to OpenAI's request, the legal representatives of the New York Times submitted a rebuttal on July 3, expressing their opposition to the demand and urging the judge to reject it. The NYT's lawyers asserted that OpenAI's claim for access to all documentation related to the creation of each work, to verify their protectable intellectual property, is unprecedented and contrary to copyright law principles.

The New York Times' motion to dismiss emphasizes that the method of creating copyrighted material is irrelevant to its use in the present case. As of the latest available information, no additional documents have been disclosed to the public. The outcome of this legal battle and the judge's response to the conflicting motions are yet to be determined.

Tier I

Sector: #18291

Sealed Hiding Place Room

Resource Cache

Resource Cache

Tier I

Requires 25% Tier Progress to Claim
Meme Cache

Meme Cache

Tier I

Requires 50% Tier Progress to Claim
Equipment Cache

Equipment Cache

Tier I

Requires 75% Tier Progress to Claim

After collecting, hiding places will be stored in your inventory and can be opened with Keys.

Other news

Chainstack Expands Incident Report on Security Breach

Chainstack has updated its incident report detailing an October security breach caused by access control failures.

user avatarMiguel Rodriguez

Sygnum Launches ETH Alpha Fund Targeting 8-10% Annual Returns

Sygnum has launched its ETH Alpha Fund targeting annual returns of 8-10% for professional investors, combining staking with various strategies.

user avatarLuis Flores

Chainlink and Moody's Ratings Complete Crosschain Distribution Pilot

Chainlink and Moody's Ratings have successfully completed a pilot project utilizing the CrossChain Interoperability Protocol to distribute credit information across multiple networks.

user avatarArif Mukhtar

Solana Foundation Plans Custom Rings for Institutions

The Solana Foundation is working on Custom Rings for institutions, expected to provide configurable privacy and auditor access.

user avatarDavid Robinson

Helius Introduces Privacy Rings on Solana Mainnet

Helius has launched Privacy Rings on the Solana mainnet, enabling confidential asset transfers while maintaining transparency.

user avatarMaria Gutierrez

Aave's Governance to Review Proposed Changes

Aave Governance is set to review TokenLogic's proposal regarding reserve factors and its implications for liquidity and supplier incentives.

user avatarJacob Williams

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.