Legal Battle Between New York Times and OpenAI Takes a Peculiar Turn

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

2 years ago

Made with AI


An ongoing legal dispute between the renowned publisher New York Times (NYT) and artificial intelligence (AI) firm OpenAI entered a new phase on July 1. OpenAI made a request to the court that the publisher substantiate the originality of its articles by presenting detailed source materials for each copyrighted work. The NYT accused OpenAI of utilizing its articles to train AI models without permission or compensation, while OpenAI defended its use by stating that the materials were gathered fairly from internet sources.

OpenAI, as reported by TorrentFreak, filed a petition on July 1 in a U.S. court in New York requesting the judge to instruct the NYT to provide evidence demonstrating the originality of their copyrighted works. This request seemingly covers a broad spectrum of articles published by the NYT that may have been available online.

Furthermore, OpenAI requested that the NYT furnish comprehensive information regarding the authorship process for each article. OpenAI's legal team highlighted that the NYT invested significant resources in creating their works, including in-depth investigations into various public interest areas over extended periods. Therefore, OpenAI argued that they have the right to explore similar details through the discovery process.

In response to OpenAI's request, the legal representatives of the New York Times submitted a rebuttal on July 3, expressing their opposition to the demand and urging the judge to reject it. The NYT's lawyers asserted that OpenAI's claim for access to all documentation related to the creation of each work, to verify their protectable intellectual property, is unprecedented and contrary to copyright law principles.

The New York Times' motion to dismiss emphasizes that the method of creating copyrighted material is irrelevant to its use in the present case. As of the latest available information, no additional documents have been disclosed to the public. The outcome of this legal battle and the judge's response to the conflicting motions are yet to be determined.

Tier I

Sector: #18291

Sealed Cache Room

Resource Cache

Resource Cache

Tier I

Requires 25% Tier Progress to Claim
Meme Cache

Meme Cache

Tier I

Requires 50% Tier Progress to Claim
Equipment Cache

Equipment Cache

Tier I

Requires 75% Tier Progress to Claim

After collecting, caches will be stored in your inventory and can be opened with Keys.

Other news

Walmart's Stock Plummets After Earnings Report

chest

Walmart's stock fell over 9% after its fiscal second-quarter earnings report showed only a 2.6% increase in US comparable sales, raising investor concerns.

user avatarLuis Flores

New Report Released Based on Primary Source Documentation

chest

The report is based on information released in disclosures at primary source documentation, ensuring that the information provided is accurate and reliable.

user avatarArif Mukhtar

New Report Utilizes Primary Source Documentation for Findings

chest

The latest report utilizes primary source documentation for its findings.

user avatarMaria Gutierrez

Trump Calls for Passage of Clarity Act to Boost U.S. Crypto Market

chest

President Trump called for Congress to pass the Clarity Act to establish federal rules for digital assets and maintain U.S. leadership in the crypto market.

user avatarDavid Robinson

GTA 6 Gameplay Leaks Cause Stock Decline for Take Two

chest

This week, the highly anticipated release of GTA 6 from Rockstar Games and Take Two Interactive has been marred by several gameplay leaks, causing Take Two's stock to decline over 15%.

user avatarAndrew Smith

Coinbase Refocuses Base App Strategy After Initial Setbacks

chest

Coinbase shifts its strategy for the Base App, moving away from social features to focus on trading and AI tools.

user avatarJacob Williams

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.