• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

Legal Battle Between New York Times and OpenAI Takes a Peculiar Turn

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

2 years ago


An ongoing legal dispute between the renowned publisher New York Times (NYT) and artificial intelligence (AI) firm OpenAI entered a new phase on July 1. OpenAI made a request to the court that the publisher substantiate the originality of its articles by presenting detailed source materials for each copyrighted work. The NYT accused OpenAI of utilizing its articles to train AI models without permission or compensation, while OpenAI defended its use by stating that the materials were gathered fairly from internet sources.

OpenAI, as reported by TorrentFreak, filed a petition on July 1 in a U.S. court in New York requesting the judge to instruct the NYT to provide evidence demonstrating the originality of their copyrighted works. This request seemingly covers a broad spectrum of articles published by the NYT that may have been available online.

Furthermore, OpenAI requested that the NYT furnish comprehensive information regarding the authorship process for each article. OpenAI's legal team highlighted that the NYT invested significant resources in creating their works, including in-depth investigations into various public interest areas over extended periods. Therefore, OpenAI argued that they have the right to explore similar details through the discovery process.

In response to OpenAI's request, the legal representatives of the New York Times submitted a rebuttal on July 3, expressing their opposition to the demand and urging the judge to reject it. The NYT's lawyers asserted that OpenAI's claim for access to all documentation related to the creation of each work, to verify their protectable intellectual property, is unprecedented and contrary to copyright law principles.

The New York Times' motion to dismiss emphasizes that the method of creating copyrighted material is irrelevant to its use in the present case. As of the latest available information, no additional documents have been disclosed to the public. The outcome of this legal battle and the judge's response to the conflicting motions are yet to be determined.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Hong Kong's Regulatory Framework for Crypto Trading

chest

Hong Kong's regulatory framework for virtual asset trading is evolving, focusing on clear licensing and compliance roles for financial institutions.

user avatarKofi Adjeman

Changpeng Zhao Declines to Return to Binance Following Presidential Pardon

chest

Changpeng Zhao, cofounder of Binance, confirmed he will not return to the crypto exchange after receiving a presidential pardon, emphasizing the importance of new leadership.

user avatarNguyen Van Long

Erik Zhang Demands Da Hongfei's Resignation Amid Leadership Dispute

chest

Erik Zhang demands Da Hongfei's resignation following a failed meeting regarding project alignment, highlighting tensions within NEO's leadership.

user avatarSatoshi Nakamura

Solana's Future Outlook Remains Positive with Upcoming Alpenglow Upgrade

chest

The anticipated Alpenglow upgrade is expected to enhance Solana's network performance, reinforcing its competitive position.

user avatarJesper Sørensen

Security Breach in SwapNet Leads to Stolen Assets

chest

A significant security breach in SwapNet has resulted in the theft of approximately $168 million in cryptocurrency assets.

user avatarRajesh Kumar

Rick Rieder Emerges as Frontrunner for Federal Reserve Chair

chest

Rick Rieder has emerged as the frontrunner with a 60% chance to succeed Jerome Powell as Federal Reserve Chair, reflecting growing confidence in his policies.

user avatarLucas Weissmann

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.