• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

Legal Battle Between New York Times and OpenAI Takes a Peculiar Turn

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

2 years ago


An ongoing legal dispute between the renowned publisher New York Times (NYT) and artificial intelligence (AI) firm OpenAI entered a new phase on July 1. OpenAI made a request to the court that the publisher substantiate the originality of its articles by presenting detailed source materials for each copyrighted work. The NYT accused OpenAI of utilizing its articles to train AI models without permission or compensation, while OpenAI defended its use by stating that the materials were gathered fairly from internet sources.

OpenAI, as reported by TorrentFreak, filed a petition on July 1 in a U.S. court in New York requesting the judge to instruct the NYT to provide evidence demonstrating the originality of their copyrighted works. This request seemingly covers a broad spectrum of articles published by the NYT that may have been available online.

Furthermore, OpenAI requested that the NYT furnish comprehensive information regarding the authorship process for each article. OpenAI's legal team highlighted that the NYT invested significant resources in creating their works, including in-depth investigations into various public interest areas over extended periods. Therefore, OpenAI argued that they have the right to explore similar details through the discovery process.

In response to OpenAI's request, the legal representatives of the New York Times submitted a rebuttal on July 3, expressing their opposition to the demand and urging the judge to reject it. The NYT's lawyers asserted that OpenAI's claim for access to all documentation related to the creation of each work, to verify their protectable intellectual property, is unprecedented and contrary to copyright law principles.

The New York Times' motion to dismiss emphasizes that the method of creating copyrighted material is irrelevant to its use in the present case. As of the latest available information, no additional documents have been disclosed to the public. The outcome of this legal battle and the judge's response to the conflicting motions are yet to be determined.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Linq's Strategic Pivot to AI Messaging Infrastructure Enhances User Experience

chest

Linq has pivoted to become an infrastructure provider for AI assistants in messaging apps, responding to market demand.

user avatarAndrew Smith

Epstein's Alleged Role in Bitcoin Development Sparks Controversy

chest

Recent interpretations of Jeffrey Epstein's correspondence suggest he had significant influence over Bitcoin's development, despite the decentralized nature of the cryptocurrency.

user avatarArif Mukhtar

Cboe's Binary Options Could Transform Prediction Market Landscape

chest

Cboe's entry into the binary options market may legitimize prediction-style trading and influence regulatory discussions.

user avatarLeo van der Veen

Cboe's Proposed Binary Options to be Regulated by SEC and CFTC

chest

Cboe Global Markets has proposed binary options to be regulated by the SEC and CFTC, ensuring compliance and investor protection.

user avatarMaya Lundqvist

US Crypto Media Traffic Declines in Q4 2025

chest

US cryptonative media experienced a significant drop in traffic during Q4 2025, with visits down by 28.24% to 10.618 million, affecting 71.95% of outlets.

user avatarTenzin Dorje

Cboe Global Markets Considers Relaunch of Binary Options for Retail Investors

chest

Cboe Global Markets is exploring the relaunch of binary options for retail investors, aiming to meet the demand for simplified trading instruments.

user avatarLi Weicheng

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.