• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

Legal Battle Between New York Times and OpenAI Takes a Peculiar Turn

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

2 years ago


An ongoing legal dispute between the renowned publisher New York Times (NYT) and artificial intelligence (AI) firm OpenAI entered a new phase on July 1. OpenAI made a request to the court that the publisher substantiate the originality of its articles by presenting detailed source materials for each copyrighted work. The NYT accused OpenAI of utilizing its articles to train AI models without permission or compensation, while OpenAI defended its use by stating that the materials were gathered fairly from internet sources.

OpenAI, as reported by TorrentFreak, filed a petition on July 1 in a U.S. court in New York requesting the judge to instruct the NYT to provide evidence demonstrating the originality of their copyrighted works. This request seemingly covers a broad spectrum of articles published by the NYT that may have been available online.

Furthermore, OpenAI requested that the NYT furnish comprehensive information regarding the authorship process for each article. OpenAI's legal team highlighted that the NYT invested significant resources in creating their works, including in-depth investigations into various public interest areas over extended periods. Therefore, OpenAI argued that they have the right to explore similar details through the discovery process.

In response to OpenAI's request, the legal representatives of the New York Times submitted a rebuttal on July 3, expressing their opposition to the demand and urging the judge to reject it. The NYT's lawyers asserted that OpenAI's claim for access to all documentation related to the creation of each work, to verify their protectable intellectual property, is unprecedented and contrary to copyright law principles.

The New York Times' motion to dismiss emphasizes that the method of creating copyrighted material is irrelevant to its use in the present case. As of the latest available information, no additional documents have been disclosed to the public. The outcome of this legal battle and the judge's response to the conflicting motions are yet to be determined.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

El Salvador's Bitcoin Strategy Continues Alongside Gold Purchases

chest

El Salvador continues to accumulate Bitcoin alongside gold purchases, holding 7,547 BTC valued at approximately $635 million, as part of its strategy to enhance economic sovereignty.

user avatarKenji Takahashi

Diverging Central Bank Policies Shape Asian Currency Markets

chest

Divergent monetary policies among Asian central banks create unique challenges and opportunities for currency traders.

user avatarMaria Fernandez

Asian Currencies Show Cautious Gains in January

chest

Asian currencies are experiencing cautious gains as the US dollar stabilizes ahead of critical Federal Reserve testimony.

user avatarMiguel Rodriguez

LBank Honored with CoinGape's BEST CEX Crypto Futures & Derivatives Award

chest

LBank was awarded the BEST CEX Crypto Futures & Derivatives award by CoinGape on January 30th, 2026, in Singapore, recognizing its leadership in contract trading and market share.

user avatarGustavo Mendoza

US Dollar Stabilizes Ahead of Powell's Testimony

chest

The US dollar index stabilizes as markets await insights from Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell's congressional testimony.

user avatarRajesh Kumar

AI Integration in Bybit's Financial Infrastructure

chest

Bybit is deploying artificial intelligence as a core infrastructure to improve efficiency, rolling out AI4SE in 2026 to enhance risk management and lower operational costs.

user avatarLuis Flores

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.