• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

Legal Battle Between New York Times and OpenAI Takes a Peculiar Turn

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

2 years ago


An ongoing legal dispute between the renowned publisher New York Times (NYT) and artificial intelligence (AI) firm OpenAI entered a new phase on July 1. OpenAI made a request to the court that the publisher substantiate the originality of its articles by presenting detailed source materials for each copyrighted work. The NYT accused OpenAI of utilizing its articles to train AI models without permission or compensation, while OpenAI defended its use by stating that the materials were gathered fairly from internet sources.

OpenAI, as reported by TorrentFreak, filed a petition on July 1 in a U.S. court in New York requesting the judge to instruct the NYT to provide evidence demonstrating the originality of their copyrighted works. This request seemingly covers a broad spectrum of articles published by the NYT that may have been available online.

Furthermore, OpenAI requested that the NYT furnish comprehensive information regarding the authorship process for each article. OpenAI's legal team highlighted that the NYT invested significant resources in creating their works, including in-depth investigations into various public interest areas over extended periods. Therefore, OpenAI argued that they have the right to explore similar details through the discovery process.

In response to OpenAI's request, the legal representatives of the New York Times submitted a rebuttal on July 3, expressing their opposition to the demand and urging the judge to reject it. The NYT's lawyers asserted that OpenAI's claim for access to all documentation related to the creation of each work, to verify their protectable intellectual property, is unprecedented and contrary to copyright law principles.

The New York Times' motion to dismiss emphasizes that the method of creating copyrighted material is irrelevant to its use in the present case. As of the latest available information, no additional documents have been disclosed to the public. The outcome of this legal battle and the judge's response to the conflicting motions are yet to be determined.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Arbitrage: A Key Component of Market Quality in Prediction Markets

chest

Arbitrage is essential for enhancing the quality of prediction markets by ensuring prices reflect settlement realities and maintaining usability for serious participants.

user avatarFilippo Romano

US DOJ to Dismiss Insider Trading Case Against Nathaniel Chastain

chest

The US Department of Justice will dismiss the insider trading case against Nathaniel Chastain, following a deferred prosecution agreement.

user avatarRajesh Kumar

The Structural Nature of Arbitrage in Prediction Markets

chest

Arbitrage in prediction markets like Polymarket is a structural necessity that stabilizes markets and enhances credibility.

user avatarLucas Weissmann

Historical Lows Predict Market Optimism and Potential Volatility

chest

Historically low cash holdings indicate market optimism, potentially leading to economic booms and increased volatility.

user avatarEmily Carter

Ongoing Deliberation on Corporate Digital Asset Investment Framework

chest

The Financial Services Commission of South Korea is discussing with a public-private task force to create guidelines for corporate participation in digital asset markets.

user avatarTomas Novak

Sui Blockchain's Mysticeti V2 Achieves Subsecond Finality

chest

The Sui blockchain's Mysticeti V2 upgrade has achieved subsecond block finality, enhancing user experience and enabling new decentralized applications.

user avatarKaterina Papadopoulou

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.