• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

Legal Battle Between New York Times and OpenAI Takes a Peculiar Turn

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

2 years ago


An ongoing legal dispute between the renowned publisher New York Times (NYT) and artificial intelligence (AI) firm OpenAI entered a new phase on July 1. OpenAI made a request to the court that the publisher substantiate the originality of its articles by presenting detailed source materials for each copyrighted work. The NYT accused OpenAI of utilizing its articles to train AI models without permission or compensation, while OpenAI defended its use by stating that the materials were gathered fairly from internet sources.

OpenAI, as reported by TorrentFreak, filed a petition on July 1 in a U.S. court in New York requesting the judge to instruct the NYT to provide evidence demonstrating the originality of their copyrighted works. This request seemingly covers a broad spectrum of articles published by the NYT that may have been available online.

Furthermore, OpenAI requested that the NYT furnish comprehensive information regarding the authorship process for each article. OpenAI's legal team highlighted that the NYT invested significant resources in creating their works, including in-depth investigations into various public interest areas over extended periods. Therefore, OpenAI argued that they have the right to explore similar details through the discovery process.

In response to OpenAI's request, the legal representatives of the New York Times submitted a rebuttal on July 3, expressing their opposition to the demand and urging the judge to reject it. The NYT's lawyers asserted that OpenAI's claim for access to all documentation related to the creation of each work, to verify their protectable intellectual property, is unprecedented and contrary to copyright law principles.

The New York Times' motion to dismiss emphasizes that the method of creating copyrighted material is irrelevant to its use in the present case. As of the latest available information, no additional documents have been disclosed to the public. The outcome of this legal battle and the judge's response to the conflicting motions are yet to be determined.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Zcash Surges to New High as Institutional Interest Grows

chest

Zcash (ZEC) has surged to a new year-to-date high of 590, driven by significant institutional investment from Multicoin Capital.

user avatarTenzin Dorje

Sabadell Joins European Banking Consortium for Stablecoin Initiative

chest

Spanish bank Sabadell has joined the Qivalis consortium aimed at launching a Europe-pegged stablecoin.

user avatarBayarjavkhlan Ganbaatar

Ripple CEO Highlights Critical Hearing for CLARITY Act's Future

chest

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse emphasizes the importance of the upcoming Senate Banking Committee hearing for the CLARITY Act's progress.

user avatarMohamed Farouk

Bitcoin Holds Steady Above 80,000 as Market Recovery is Tested

chest

Bitcoin's price remains above 80,000, indicating a recovery from March lows, with differing behaviors observed among large holders.

user avatarElias Mukuru

Gerstein Harrow LLP Files Restraining Notice Over Ethereum Linked to Kelp DAO Hack

chest

Gerstein Harrow LLP has filed a restraining notice in a New York district court, claiming legal rights to approximately 30,766 Ethereum frozen after the Kelp DAO hack.

user avatarDiego Alvarez

Aave Takes Legal Action to Release Frozen Ethereum in Kelp DAO Hack Case

chest

Aave has filed an emergency motion in a New York district court to vacate a restraining notice blocking the Arbitrum DAO from accessing approximately 30,766 Ethereum frozen after the Kelp DAO hack.

user avatarKenji Takahashi

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.