• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

Legal Battle Between New York Times and OpenAI Takes a Peculiar Turn

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

2 years ago


An ongoing legal dispute between the renowned publisher New York Times (NYT) and artificial intelligence (AI) firm OpenAI entered a new phase on July 1. OpenAI made a request to the court that the publisher substantiate the originality of its articles by presenting detailed source materials for each copyrighted work. The NYT accused OpenAI of utilizing its articles to train AI models without permission or compensation, while OpenAI defended its use by stating that the materials were gathered fairly from internet sources.

OpenAI, as reported by TorrentFreak, filed a petition on July 1 in a U.S. court in New York requesting the judge to instruct the NYT to provide evidence demonstrating the originality of their copyrighted works. This request seemingly covers a broad spectrum of articles published by the NYT that may have been available online.

Furthermore, OpenAI requested that the NYT furnish comprehensive information regarding the authorship process for each article. OpenAI's legal team highlighted that the NYT invested significant resources in creating their works, including in-depth investigations into various public interest areas over extended periods. Therefore, OpenAI argued that they have the right to explore similar details through the discovery process.

In response to OpenAI's request, the legal representatives of the New York Times submitted a rebuttal on July 3, expressing their opposition to the demand and urging the judge to reject it. The NYT's lawyers asserted that OpenAI's claim for access to all documentation related to the creation of each work, to verify their protectable intellectual property, is unprecedented and contrary to copyright law principles.

The New York Times' motion to dismiss emphasizes that the method of creating copyrighted material is irrelevant to its use in the present case. As of the latest available information, no additional documents have been disclosed to the public. The outcome of this legal battle and the judge's response to the conflicting motions are yet to be determined.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Strive Asset Management Introduces Innovative Bitcoin-Backed Securities

chest

Strive Asset Management has launched SATA preferred shares, the first listed US security to pay daily dividends, with a 13% annualized rate, aiming to reshape perceptions of money and credit.

user avatarTenzin Dorje

Samsung Affiliates Invest in Leading Crypto Exchange Dunamu

chest

Three Samsung affiliates announced a combined acquisition of a 4% stake in Dunamu, operator of South Korea's leading crypto exchange, Upbit, for approximately 408 million USD.

user avatarBayarjavkhlan Ganbaatar

Worldcoin's Price Reversal Following Initial Surge

chest

Worldcoin's price has fallen back after reaching an 11-week high, raising concerns about the sustainability of the rally.

user avatarElias Mukuru

Worldcoin Experiences Surge in Onchain Activity Amid Price Rally

chest

Worldcoin's recent price rally led to a significant increase in onchain activity, including whale transactions and new wallet creations.

user avatarMohamed Farouk

AI Tools Increasing Threats to DeFi Security, Experts Warn

chest

Experts warn that AI-powered coding tools are enabling attackers to exploit vulnerabilities in DeFi protocols at unprecedented speed.

user avatarKenji Takahashi

Attackers Exploit DeFi Vulnerabilities, Draining $200,000 from Uniswap V3

chest

Attackers exploited vulnerabilities in DeFi protocols, draining $200,000 from Uniswap V3.

user avatarDiego Alvarez

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.