Legal Battle Between New York Times and OpenAI Takes a Peculiar Turn

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

2 years ago

Made with AI


An ongoing legal dispute between the renowned publisher New York Times (NYT) and artificial intelligence (AI) firm OpenAI entered a new phase on July 1. OpenAI made a request to the court that the publisher substantiate the originality of its articles by presenting detailed source materials for each copyrighted work. The NYT accused OpenAI of utilizing its articles to train AI models without permission or compensation, while OpenAI defended its use by stating that the materials were gathered fairly from internet sources.

OpenAI, as reported by TorrentFreak, filed a petition on July 1 in a U.S. court in New York requesting the judge to instruct the NYT to provide evidence demonstrating the originality of their copyrighted works. This request seemingly covers a broad spectrum of articles published by the NYT that may have been available online.

Furthermore, OpenAI requested that the NYT furnish comprehensive information regarding the authorship process for each article. OpenAI's legal team highlighted that the NYT invested significant resources in creating their works, including in-depth investigations into various public interest areas over extended periods. Therefore, OpenAI argued that they have the right to explore similar details through the discovery process.

In response to OpenAI's request, the legal representatives of the New York Times submitted a rebuttal on July 3, expressing their opposition to the demand and urging the judge to reject it. The NYT's lawyers asserted that OpenAI's claim for access to all documentation related to the creation of each work, to verify their protectable intellectual property, is unprecedented and contrary to copyright law principles.

The New York Times' motion to dismiss emphasizes that the method of creating copyrighted material is irrelevant to its use in the present case. As of the latest available information, no additional documents have been disclosed to the public. The outcome of this legal battle and the judge's response to the conflicting motions are yet to be determined.

Tier I

Sector: #18291

Sealed Hiding Place Room

Resource Cache

Resource Cache

Tier I

Requires 25% Tier Progress to Claim
Meme Cache

Meme Cache

Tier I

Requires 50% Tier Progress to Claim
Equipment Cache

Equipment Cache

Tier I

Requires 75% Tier Progress to Claim

After collecting, hiding places will be stored in your inventory and can be opened with Keys.

Other news

Visa's Research Highlights Trust as a Barrier to Stablecoin Adoption

Visa's research highlights that trust and fraud protection are essential for stablecoin adoption, with 36% of US respondents considering their use, especially with bank-level protections.

user avatarTomas Novak

Cardano's Onchain Governance Approves New Treasury Allocations

Cardano's governance system has approved a new round of treasury allocations aimed at infrastructure and ecosystem development.

user avatarKaterina Papadopoulou

Galaxy Invests $100 Million in Onchain Credit Infrastructure

Galaxy has invested $100 million in Sky Protocol's yield-bearing sUSDS, integrating it into its corporate treasury and allowing it as collateral for institutional trading.

user avatarMaya Lundqvist

Blockchain.com and NYSE Join Forces to Launch Tokenized Trading Platform

Blockchain.com and the New York Stock Exchange have signed an agreement to develop a platform for trading tokenized US stocks and ETFs.

user avatarLeo van der Veen

Circle Launches StableFX for Onchain Foreign Exchange

Circle has launched StableFX, a service for institutions to exchange stablecoin-denominated currencies on its blockchain, Arc, enabling 24/7 currency exchanges and improving foreign exchange efficiency.

user avatarLi Weicheng

TLDR Strategy Enhances Financing Framework for Future Activities

TLDR Strategy has updated its securities paperwork to maintain its at-the-market financing capacity, crucial for future funding activities.

user avatarAisha Farooq

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.