• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

Legal Battle Between New York Times and OpenAI Takes a Peculiar Turn

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

2 years ago


An ongoing legal dispute between the renowned publisher New York Times (NYT) and artificial intelligence (AI) firm OpenAI entered a new phase on July 1. OpenAI made a request to the court that the publisher substantiate the originality of its articles by presenting detailed source materials for each copyrighted work. The NYT accused OpenAI of utilizing its articles to train AI models without permission or compensation, while OpenAI defended its use by stating that the materials were gathered fairly from internet sources.

OpenAI, as reported by TorrentFreak, filed a petition on July 1 in a U.S. court in New York requesting the judge to instruct the NYT to provide evidence demonstrating the originality of their copyrighted works. This request seemingly covers a broad spectrum of articles published by the NYT that may have been available online.

Furthermore, OpenAI requested that the NYT furnish comprehensive information regarding the authorship process for each article. OpenAI's legal team highlighted that the NYT invested significant resources in creating their works, including in-depth investigations into various public interest areas over extended periods. Therefore, OpenAI argued that they have the right to explore similar details through the discovery process.

In response to OpenAI's request, the legal representatives of the New York Times submitted a rebuttal on July 3, expressing their opposition to the demand and urging the judge to reject it. The NYT's lawyers asserted that OpenAI's claim for access to all documentation related to the creation of each work, to verify their protectable intellectual property, is unprecedented and contrary to copyright law principles.

The New York Times' motion to dismiss emphasizes that the method of creating copyrighted material is irrelevant to its use in the present case. As of the latest available information, no additional documents have been disclosed to the public. The outcome of this legal battle and the judge's response to the conflicting motions are yet to be determined.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Tether to Wind Down aUSDT and Alloy by Tether

chest

Tether announces the discontinuation of aUSDT and the Alloy platform, focusing on core products.

user avatarGustavo Mendoza

Binance Expands Monitoring Tag to New Tokens

chest

Binance has added ACT, BLUR, PIVX, and QKC to its Monitoring Tag list, indicating closer scrutiny of these tokens.

user avatarRajesh Kumar

Grayscale Research Highlights Professionalization in Crypto Asset Valuation

chest

The analysis of AAVE by Grayscale Research indicates a shift towards structured and professional approaches in crypto asset valuation.

user avatarMiguel Rodriguez

Grayscale Research Introduces Cashflow Valuation Framework for AAVE

chest

Grayscale Research has introduced a cashflow valuation framework for AAVE, highlighting the maturation of DeFi protocols.

user avatarLuis Flores

Uniswap Founder Highlights Regulatory Challenges for DeFi

chest

Hayden Adams highlights the regulatory challenges faced by DeFi protocols under US securities laws, calling for clearer regulations to support development and protect users.

user avatarArif Mukhtar

Arthur Hayes-Linked Wallet Accumulates 1,400 ETH Amid Market Reset

chest

A wallet linked to Arthur Hayes has purchased an additional 1,400 ETH, valued at around $251 million, indicating renewed whale activity in the Ethereum market.

user avatarMaria Gutierrez

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.