• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

Legal Battle Between New York Times and OpenAI Takes a Peculiar Turn

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

2 years ago


An ongoing legal dispute between the renowned publisher New York Times (NYT) and artificial intelligence (AI) firm OpenAI entered a new phase on July 1. OpenAI made a request to the court that the publisher substantiate the originality of its articles by presenting detailed source materials for each copyrighted work. The NYT accused OpenAI of utilizing its articles to train AI models without permission or compensation, while OpenAI defended its use by stating that the materials were gathered fairly from internet sources.

OpenAI, as reported by TorrentFreak, filed a petition on July 1 in a U.S. court in New York requesting the judge to instruct the NYT to provide evidence demonstrating the originality of their copyrighted works. This request seemingly covers a broad spectrum of articles published by the NYT that may have been available online.

Furthermore, OpenAI requested that the NYT furnish comprehensive information regarding the authorship process for each article. OpenAI's legal team highlighted that the NYT invested significant resources in creating their works, including in-depth investigations into various public interest areas over extended periods. Therefore, OpenAI argued that they have the right to explore similar details through the discovery process.

In response to OpenAI's request, the legal representatives of the New York Times submitted a rebuttal on July 3, expressing their opposition to the demand and urging the judge to reject it. The NYT's lawyers asserted that OpenAI's claim for access to all documentation related to the creation of each work, to verify their protectable intellectual property, is unprecedented and contrary to copyright law principles.

The New York Times' motion to dismiss emphasizes that the method of creating copyrighted material is irrelevant to its use in the present case. As of the latest available information, no additional documents have been disclosed to the public. The outcome of this legal battle and the judge's response to the conflicting motions are yet to be determined.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Iran Launches Maritime Insurance Platform Using Bitcoin

chest

Iran has introduced a new maritime insurance platform for cargo in the Strait of Hormuz, with payments settled in Bitcoin.

user avatarArif Mukhtar

Grayscale Files Second Amendment for BNB ETF as Regulatory Landscape Evolves

chest

Grayscale has filed a second amendment to its BNB ETF registration, indicating a proactive approach to align with SEC feedback.

user avatarDavid Robinson

VanEck Submits Fifth Amendment for BNB ETF as Approval Hopes Rise

chest

VanEck has filed its fifth amendment for the BNB ETF, increasing the chances of approval amid ongoing discussions with the SEC.

user avatarMaria Gutierrez

Urgent Call for Crypto Overhaul Amid Quantum Threats

chest

Charles Hoskinson emphasizes the urgent need for the cryptocurrency industry to prepare for quantum computing threats, highlighting Bitcoin Improvement Proposal BIP361 as a solution.

user avatarAndrew Smith

Ethereum OG Reenters Market with Significant Purchase

chest

An early Ethereum adopter, known as an OG in the community, has reentered the market by purchasing 1,951 ETH for approximately $426 million USDC.

user avatarJacob Williams

Tom Lee's BitMine Accumulates 89,026 ETH Amid Market Weakness

chest

Tom Lee's BitMine has acquired 89,026 ETH valued at approximately $19.764 million during a period of market weakness.

user avatarZainab Kamara

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.