• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

Legal Battle Between New York Times and OpenAI Takes a Peculiar Turn

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

a year ago


An ongoing legal dispute between the renowned publisher New York Times (NYT) and artificial intelligence (AI) firm OpenAI entered a new phase on July 1. OpenAI made a request to the court that the publisher substantiate the originality of its articles by presenting detailed source materials for each copyrighted work. The NYT accused OpenAI of utilizing its articles to train AI models without permission or compensation, while OpenAI defended its use by stating that the materials were gathered fairly from internet sources.

OpenAI, as reported by TorrentFreak, filed a petition on July 1 in a U.S. court in New York requesting the judge to instruct the NYT to provide evidence demonstrating the originality of their copyrighted works. This request seemingly covers a broad spectrum of articles published by the NYT that may have been available online.

Furthermore, OpenAI requested that the NYT furnish comprehensive information regarding the authorship process for each article. OpenAI's legal team highlighted that the NYT invested significant resources in creating their works, including in-depth investigations into various public interest areas over extended periods. Therefore, OpenAI argued that they have the right to explore similar details through the discovery process.

In response to OpenAI's request, the legal representatives of the New York Times submitted a rebuttal on July 3, expressing their opposition to the demand and urging the judge to reject it. The NYT's lawyers asserted that OpenAI's claim for access to all documentation related to the creation of each work, to verify their protectable intellectual property, is unprecedented and contrary to copyright law principles.

The New York Times' motion to dismiss emphasizes that the method of creating copyrighted material is irrelevant to its use in the present case. As of the latest available information, no additional documents have been disclosed to the public. The outcome of this legal battle and the judge's response to the conflicting motions are yet to be determined.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

JPMorgan Maintains Buy Rating for Block Inc Amid Strong Performance

chest

JPMorgan maintains a Buy rating for Block Inc, forecasting it will achieve the Rule of 40 by 2026.

user avatarLeo van der Veen

Ethena Introduces Synthetic Dollar for DeFi

chest

Ethena is revolutionizing the DeFi space with its synthetic dollar, USDe, which offers yield stability.

user avatarJacob Williams

Cardano's Slow Progress Contrasts with HUGS' Rapid Rise

chest

While Cardano struggles with slow development, HUGS is accelerating with community-driven initiatives.

user avatarLi Weicheng

Altcoins Face Pressure as Market Dynamics Shift

chest

Major altcoins are struggling to maintain support levels, with risks of further declines.

user avatarMohamed Farouk

PayPal's Focus on PYUSD Amidst Market Speculation

chest

PayPal continues to prioritize its PYUSD stablecoin while the market remains speculative due to the lack of official disclosures.

user avatarAisha Farooq

PayPal and FI Stock Value Comparison Remains Unclear

chest

The comparison of stock values between PayPal Holdings, Inc and an unspecified financial institution remains undetermined due to a lack of official statements.

user avatarTenzin Dorje

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.