• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

Legal Battle Between New York Times and OpenAI Takes a Peculiar Turn

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

2 years ago


An ongoing legal dispute between the renowned publisher New York Times (NYT) and artificial intelligence (AI) firm OpenAI entered a new phase on July 1. OpenAI made a request to the court that the publisher substantiate the originality of its articles by presenting detailed source materials for each copyrighted work. The NYT accused OpenAI of utilizing its articles to train AI models without permission or compensation, while OpenAI defended its use by stating that the materials were gathered fairly from internet sources.

OpenAI, as reported by TorrentFreak, filed a petition on July 1 in a U.S. court in New York requesting the judge to instruct the NYT to provide evidence demonstrating the originality of their copyrighted works. This request seemingly covers a broad spectrum of articles published by the NYT that may have been available online.

Furthermore, OpenAI requested that the NYT furnish comprehensive information regarding the authorship process for each article. OpenAI's legal team highlighted that the NYT invested significant resources in creating their works, including in-depth investigations into various public interest areas over extended periods. Therefore, OpenAI argued that they have the right to explore similar details through the discovery process.

In response to OpenAI's request, the legal representatives of the New York Times submitted a rebuttal on July 3, expressing their opposition to the demand and urging the judge to reject it. The NYT's lawyers asserted that OpenAI's claim for access to all documentation related to the creation of each work, to verify their protectable intellectual property, is unprecedented and contrary to copyright law principles.

The New York Times' motion to dismiss emphasizes that the method of creating copyrighted material is irrelevant to its use in the present case. As of the latest available information, no additional documents have been disclosed to the public. The outcome of this legal battle and the judge's response to the conflicting motions are yet to be determined.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Crypto Phishing Losses Plummet by 83% in 2025

chest

In 2025, crypto phishing losses fell dramatically, marking an 83% decrease from the previous year.

user avatarMaria Fernandez

West Virginia Introduces Senate Bill 143 for Bitcoin Fund Allocations

chest

West Virginia has introduced Senate Bill 143, known as the Inflation Protection Act of 2026, allowing up to 10% of state funds to be allocated to Bitcoin and other assets.

user avatarKenji Takahashi

BlackRock: Driving Returns Through Low-Carbon Transition

chest

BlackRock is leveraging the low-carbon transition as a primary driver of portfolio returns.

user avatarGustavo Mendoza

Nuveen TIAA: Setting the Standard for Verified Impact Investing

chest

Nuveen TIAA has emerged as a leader in responsible investing, managing approximately $90 billion in specialized assets and developing a Climate Solutions Investing Framework under CEO Amy O'Brien.

user avatarMiguel Rodriguez

Brookfield Asset Management: A Leader in Decarbonization Efforts

chest

Brookfield Asset Management is recognized as a leader in decarbonization, managing around $900 billion in assets and focusing on renewable energy and private equity.

user avatarRajesh Kumar

Polygon POL Price Experiences Pullback Amid Workforce Reduction

chest

Polygon POL price is experiencing a pullback as the crypto market slows, following reports of workforce reductions at Polygon Labs.

user avatarLuis Flores

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.