• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

Microsoft under fire for secretly selling AI services to fossil fuel companies despite environmental commitments

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

a year ago


  1. Collaboration with fossil fuel companies
  2. Internal criticism
  3. Emissions and commitments

  4. Microsoft, a company known for its public environmental commitments, is facing criticism for quietly selling AI services to fossil fuel giants.

    Collaboration with fossil fuel companies

    Although Microsoft has committed to being ‘carbon negative’ by 2030, it continues to work with oil companies like ExxonMobil and Chevron to provide the latter with AI technologies that increase oil production.

    According to a report by The Atlantic’s Karen Hao, Microsoft has created algorithms designed to assist fossil fuel companies in increasing their output. These AI tools identify the most probable zones to drill in to maximize the oil company’s revenue.

    Internal criticism

    While Microsoft publicly promotes its AI as a driver for sustainability, its collaboration with oil and gas companies remains largely unpublicized. As noted in the report, internally, some employees have raised concerns about Microsoft’s involvement in the fossil fuel industry.

    Holly Alpine, a former Microsoft sustainability program manager, stated that she had grown frustrated with the company’s approach. Alpine, who is now against the extraction of fossil fuels, pointed out that Microsoft’s public position on AI for sustainability is not the whole truth.

    Microsoft’s public position on AI for sustainability is not the whole truth.Holly Alpine

    Emissions and commitments

    While Microsoft has pledged to achieve carbon negativity by 2030, the company continues to engage with the fossil fuel industry. The company’s executives have stated that the AI technologies it provides to these firms can assist the latter in cutting down on energy expenses and emissions, thus making the partnership seem like one that promotes sustainable development.

    According to recent statistics, Microsoft’s emissions have risen by up to 40% since it made the carbon-negative commitment in 2020. The biggest share is the scope 3 emissions, which include the products and services that Microsoft buys and the materials that go into its construction projects.

    In 2023, the company released 15.4 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.

    Microsoft continues to face criticism for its collaboration with fossil fuel companies even amidst public commitments to reduce its carbon footprint and investments in renewable energy projects.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

CopperInu Token Faces Significant Volatility Post-Launch

chest

CopperInu token has shown significant volatility post-launch, raising concerns about insider trading.

user avatarMaria Gutierrez

Pi Network Faces Challenges Post Mainnet Launch

chest

The mainnet launch of Pi Network has led to increased pressure on the token due to rising supply and falling demand.

user avatarDavid Robinson

Valour Gains FCA Approval to Offer Bitcoin and Ethereum ETPs to Retail Investors

chest

Valour has received official approval from the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to offer Bitcoin and Ethereum staking exchange-traded products (ETPs) to retail investors.

user avatarArif Mukhtar

AI Predictions on Pi Network's Future Valuation

chest

Four AI chatbots provide insights on the potential for Pi Network's token to crash to zero.

user avatarAndrew Smith

Buterin Discusses Ethereum's Progress and Concerns

chest

Vitalik Buterin discussed Ethereum's scaling advancements and emphasized the need for applications that provide real social value during a recent interview in China.

user avatarZainab Kamara

Global Reactions to Russia's Cryptocurrency Regulation Proposal

chest

The proposed bill has sparked mixed reactions globally, with some welcoming the clarity that formal regulation brings, hoping it will legitimize the sector and attract institutional investment. Others criticize the purchase cap as overly paternalistic, arguing it stifles financial freedom and technological adoption.

user avatarJacob Williams

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.