• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

OpenAI Supports California Bill on Marking AI Content

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

a year ago


  1. Support for AB 3211 Bill
  2. OpenAI's Stance on Other Bills
  3. AI Regulation Initiatives in California

  4. The artificial intelligence startup OpenAI has expressed support for a new California bill that proposes labeling AI-generated content. The bill requires watermarks in the metadata of AI-generated photos, videos and audio clips.

    Support for AB 3211 Bill

    OpenAI Chief Strategy Officer Jason Kwon has expressed support for the AB 3211 bill, which mandates labeling of AI-generated content. According to Kwon, this will help users differentiate between human-made and AI-generated content, particularly in light of growing misinformation about political candidates. Kwon stated that new technologies and standards can help people understand the origin of online content and avoid confusion between human-generated and AI-generated content.

    OpenAI's Stance on Other Bills

    Previously, OpenAI opposed another AI-related bill, SB 1047, which required AI developers to conduct safety testing on some of their models. This bill was proposed by California State Senator Scott Wiener and co-authored by Senators Richard Roth, Susan Rubio, and Henry Stern. In a letter to Wiener and California Governor Gavin Newsom, Kwon warned about the potential negative implications of SB 1047, arguing that it would stifle innovation and slow the pace of development.

    AI Regulation Initiatives in California

    The SB 1047 and AB 3211 bills are just two of many legal initiatives in California aimed at addressing AI regulation. State lawmakers attempted to introduce 65 bills this legislative season that touch on AI. Some initiatives include measures to ensure algorithmic decisions are unbiased and protect the intellectual property of deceased individuals from exploitation by AI companies. According to records from CalMatters, AB 3211 passed the second reading on August 26 and is now ordered to a third reading. If it passes by the end of the legislative session on August 31, it will advance to Governor Newsom for signing or veto by September 30.

    OpenAI's support for the AB 3211 bill shows the company's commitment to a more transparent and understandable regulation of AI content. However, it also urges caution in regulation to avoid stifling innovation and slowing technological development.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Debate Over Privacy Software and Criminal Liability Intensifies Following Rodriguez's Case

chest

The prosecution of Keonne Rodriguez has sparked a significant debate about the legal implications of developing privacy software, raising questions about criminal liability for developers.

user avatarMaya Lundqvist

Public Reaction to Rodriguez's Case and Clemency Petition Gains Momentum

chest

Keonne Rodriguez's case has sparked mixed public reactions, with a clemency petition gathering over 12,000 signatures, raising concerns about free speech and the rights of open-source developers.

user avatarLi Weicheng

Keonne Rodriguez Begins Five-Year Sentence and Shares Prison Experience

chest

Keonne Rodriguez, cofounder of Samourai Wallet, begins a five-year prison sentence and shares his experiences in a letter from inside a US federal prison.

user avatarLeo van der Veen

Taiwan's Manufacturing Sentiment Soars Due to AI Demand

chest

Taiwan's manufacturing sentiment improved significantly in November 2025, driven by global demand for AI technology.

user avatarAisha Farooq

PEPE and BONK Show Stable Liquidity Amid Price Compression

chest

PEPE and BONK maintain active trading volumes while experiencing price compression, indicating a mature market behavior.

user avatarTenzin Dorje

Coinbase Faces Financial Fallout from Security Breach

chest

Coinbase is dealing with the aftermath of a major security breach that could cost the company up to $400 million, facing rising costs and scrutiny while trying to restore trust.

user avatarBayarjavkhlan Ganbaatar

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.