In the Ripple Labs vs. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) legal battle, the recent remedy request by the commission for $1.95 billion has been met with criticism from the crypto community. This demand has sparked discontent among XRP enthusiasts, who believe it is an excessive show of regulatory power by the SEC.

On March 22, the SEC filed a court document related to remedies, asking Ripple Inc. to pay $1.95 billion in fines and penalties. This sum is significantly higher than the $728.9 million that Ripple allegedly gained from its XRP institutional sales from 2013 to 2020.

Critics within the XRP community have expressed dissatisfaction with the SEC's request, claiming it shows bias against Ripple. Legal expert J. W. Verret pointed out the stark contrast between the SEC's demand for a 300% recovery from Ripple, compared to the typical 11% recovery sought in similar cases.

Criticism of SEC's Actions

Australian lawyer Bill Morgan also criticized the SEC's request, labeling it as an abuse of regulatory authority.

The legal battle between the two parties is ongoing, despite Ripple securing victories such as the court ruling that XRP is not a security and the dismissal of charges against its executives. The outcome of the SEC's remedy request is uncertain, with Ripple preparing to file its opposition soon.

The court's decision on the SEC's demand holds significant implications for Ripple and the broader cryptocurrency community. Ripple's entry into the stablecoin market has been overshadowed by the legal disputes, adding to the uncertainty surrounding XRP in the market.