• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

ZachXBT Calls for Overhaul of Block Explorers For Layer 1 Chains

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

2 years ago


  1. Initial Critique by ZachXBT
  2. Evaluation of Block Explorers
  3. Further Critique and Suggestions

  4. Pseudonymous blockchain investigator ZachXBT has raised concerns about the quality of block explorers for numerous Layer 1 blockchain networks.

    Initial Critique by ZachXBT

    In a September 5 post on social media platform X, ZachXBT argued that most block explorers outside of Ethereum’s Etherscan are in urgent need of a comprehensive redesign to enhance their functionality. This critique was in response to a question by Arthur Cheong, founder of DeFiance Capital, about which blockchain networks have user-friendly block explorers and easily trackable on-chain transactions.

    Evaluation of Block Explorers

    The famous blockchain sleuth ranked various block explorers and rated the block explorers for Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM)-compatible chains, such as those supported by OKLink, as well as Solana’s Solscan and Ripple’s Bithomp, as “okay” but not ideal. Blockchair, Mempool, and WalletExplorer were rated as “good block explorers,” the analyst noted that they were acceptable tools for tracking Bitcoin transactions. ZachXBT placed Cosmos, Bittensor, Hedera, Harmony, Algorand, Aptos, and Sui in the “bottom tier” for block explorers. They specifically criticized the ones for Aptos and Sui, describing them as “not great” for on-chain transaction tracking.

    Further Critique and Suggestions

    Meanwhile, ZachXBT had earlier criticized Sui’s block explorer, SuiVision, for its significant shortcomings in another X post on August 12. They highlighted the platform’s inability to filter spam transactions, tokens, amounts, or even date and time, calling it “complete garbage.” However, ZachXBT noted that with the proper updates or grants to the appropriate teams, there is still “potential” for improvement. When asked by the community if they had plans to develop a “multi-chain block explorer,” ZachXBT responded that, while appealing in theory, many chains aren’t profitable enough to justify the effort. However, they suggested pursuing a similar project, promising to share more details in a future update.

    In conclusion, ZachXBT is calling for significant improvements in block explorers for Layer 1 networks. They acknowledge the potential for changes but emphasize the need for investments and updates to realize these improvements.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

XRP Market Liquidity Shifts to Upbit

chest

Recent data indicates that Upbit has surpassed Binance and Coinbase in XRP trading volume, signaling a notable shift in market liquidity.

user avatarLuis Flores

Sharplink Reports Significant Loss Amid Ethereum Price Drop

chest

Sharplink reported a full-year loss of $734 million due to declining Ethereum prices, despite achieving $101 million in profits in 2024.

user avatarArif Mukhtar

UK Political Landscape Faces Scrutiny Over Crypto Donations

chest

Reform UK has become the first major British political party to accept cryptocurrency donations, raising concerns about transparency, money laundering, and foreign interference in elections.

user avatarMaria Gutierrez

Nigel Farage Joins Stack BTC Plc as Investor

chest

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has made a notable investment in Stack BTC Plc, contributing to a fundraising round aimed at bolstering the company's Bitcoin treasury.

user avatarDavid Robinson

Dogecoin Faces Critical Support Level Amidst Technical Analysis

chest

Dogecoin is currently trading near multiyear lows, with traders speculating on a potential breakout as it tests a critical support level.

user avatarAndrew Smith

Traditional Banks Consider Legal Action Against OCC Over Crypto Licenses

chest

The traditional banking sector in the U.S. is considering legal action against the OCC over federal licenses granted to crypto firms.

user avatarJacob Williams

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.