• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

ZK Rollups Comparison

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

2 years ago


The Ethereum network is considered the most resilient DeFi infrastructure available, requiring effective scalability to handle financial transactions on a large scale. The concept of ZK rollups has emerged as a crucial development in this evolution, with different types of rollups offering varying levels of efficiency.

Optimistic Rollups (ORs) have been a popular choice due to their ability to scale batch transactions, albeit imperfectly. However, ZK-rollups (ZKRs) have emerged as the ideal solution. ZKRs offer significantly higher throughput than ORs, enhanced security features, and the ability to validate transactions without the need for honest validators or withdrawal holds.

Within the realm of ZK technology, ZK-SNARKs and ZK-STARKs are the two primary variants. While ZK-SNARKs require a trusted setup phase using a private/public key pair, ZK-STARKs utilize publicly verifiable randomness, eliminating the need for trust and enhancing overall security.

STARKs have proven to be more robust to potential attacks, offering higher scalability and quantum-hack resilience compared to SNARKs. By choosing to build on Starknet's ZK-STARKs, developers can ensure the long-term security and scalability of their projects.

Choosing the most efficient and secure scaling technology, like ZK-STARKs, is essential for the future of decentralized applications. The market is likely to recognize the value of this choice over time. By aligning with Starknet, developers can benefit from a professional and technology-focused team, ensuring the optimal platform for building innovative projects.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Gemini Exits Canada to Focus on US Market

chest

Gemini, led by the Winklevoss twins, is withdrawing from Canada and other secondary markets to concentrate on the US.

user avatarMohamed Farouk

JPMorgan Faces Scrutiny Over Past Manipulative Conduct

chest

JPMorgan faces scrutiny due to past manipulative conduct, having paid over $920 million for deceptive practices in precious metals futures.

user avatarDiego Alvarez

John E Deaton Accuses JPMorgan of Manipulating Bitcoin Prices

chest

John E Deaton accuses JPMorgan and CEO Jamie Dimon of manipulating Bitcoin prices through paper markets, drawing parallels to past manipulations in precious metals.

user avatarElias Mukuru

DDC Continues Bitcoin Accumulation Amid Corporate Shift

chest

DDC has purchased an additional 105 BTC, reflecting a growing trend among corporations to secure Bitcoin as a treasury asset.

user avatarKenji Takahashi

Galaxy Digital Refutes Quantum Computing Concerns Over Bitcoin Trade

chest

Galaxy Digital refutes claims that a significant Bitcoin trade was motivated by fears of quantum computing threats.

user avatarMaria Fernandez

Bullish Reports Significant Q4 Loss Amid Market Downturn

chest

Bullish reported a significant Q4 net loss of $563 million, a stark contrast to the previous year's profit of $1,048 million, highlighting vulnerabilities in the current market.

user avatarGustavo Mendoza

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.