• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M
Celsius vs. Tether: Battle for 57,000 BTC in court

Celsius vs. Tether: Battle for 57,000 BTC in court

user avatar

by Elena Ryabokon

a year ago


Celsius, the bankrupt cryptocurrency platform, has filed a lawsuit against Tether, the issuer of the largest stablecoin USDT, seeking compensation of 57,428.64 bitcoins (BTC) or their equivalent in US dollars. As of August 9, 2023, when the lawsuit was filed, this amount was approximately $3.5 billion.

Reasons for the Lawsuit and Celsius's Demands

The lawsuit is based on a credit agreement signed between the crypto company and Tether in 2020. According to this contract, the crypto firm was allowed to borrow stablecoins USDT and EURT at low interest rates, using Bitcoin as collateral. At its peak, the crypto platform owed Tether over $2 billion, securing the debt with a substantial amount of BTC.

However, the crypto platform claims that the use of Bitcoin as collateral was fraudulent. In the lawsuit, the company stated that Tether sold the collateral assets at a time when the platform was nearing bankruptcy and the price of Bitcoin was plummeting. According to the company, these actions allegedly allowed Tether to avoid the consequences of the platform’s collapse.

Representatives of the crypto platform assert that these actions "undoubtedly improved Tether’s position" during a period when the organization was already on the brink of financial collapse, and the value of the collateral assets had significantly dropped.

Challenging Tether’s Actions

Celsius also alleges that Tether violated the terms of the agreement, particularly the obligation to observe a 10-hour waiting period before liquidating the bitcoins. Celsius claims that Tether carried out the liquidation at a commercially disadvantageous price. The company noted that the bitcoins were sold at an average price of $20,656.88, which was significantly lower than the market closing price of $22,487.39 on June 13, 2022.

Celsius emphasized that Tether's actions, including selling the bitcoins at a depressed price, "prevented the company from weathering the market downturn and hindered the possibility of seeking bankruptcy relief."

Purpose of the Lawsuit

Celsius is seeking the return of the allegedly unlawfully transferred bitcoins, totaling over 57,000 tokens. The company demands either the return of the BTC or the equivalent amount in dollars as compensation. Celsius asserts that these "preferential and fraudulent transfers" should be annulled, and the value of the assets returned in the interest of its estate.

Context of the Situation and Tether’s Position

This lawsuit highlights how Tether managed to avoid the financial difficulties that other crypto companies faced during the bear market of 2022. At that time, Tether's CTO Paolo Ardoino stated that the company had liquidated its Celsius loan "without loss" and minimized market impact. Ardoino mentioned that Tether's actions were aimed at mitigating risks, allowing the company to maintain its position in challenging conditions.

The lawsuit by Celsius reveals details of how Tether navigated the crisis while many other crypto companies faced severe financial challenges. A key question in the dispute is whether Tether's actions were legal and whether they complied with the terms of the agreement between the two companies.

Conclusion

In summary, the lawsuit between Celsius and Tether underscores the complex relationship between two major players in the cryptocurrency market. While Celsius seeks to recover its assets or receive compensation, this case highlights the risks and complexities associated with lending in the crypto industry. The outcome of the legal battle could have significant implications for both parties and the broader cryptocurrency ecosystem.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

Other news

China's Growing Interest in Digital Currencies and Stablecoins: Regulatory Developments

chest

Chinese authorities and tech companies are revisiting digital currencies despite a ban on cryptocurrencies.

user avatarGiorgi Kostiuk

Upbit Adds Ethena (ENA) Token Trading Support in KRW, BTC, and USDT Pairs

chest

Digital asset exchange Upbit has announced trading support for the Ethena (ENA) token in KRW, BTC, and USDT pairs starting July 11, 2025.

user avatarGiorgi Kostiuk

Successful Conclusion of Ripple's Drought Insurance Pilot

chest

Ripple has successfully concluded its drought insurance pilot in Kenya, providing protection for 517 pastoral communities.

user avatarGiorgi Kostiuk

Crypto Market: Liquidation of Over $1 Billion in Shorts

chest

In the last 24 hours, over $1 billion in crypto shorts were liquidated, primarily on Bitcoin. Analysis of trends and factors.

user avatarGiorgi Kostiuk

Bitcoin Hits Historic High: Causes and Future Predictions

chest

Bitcoin reached an all-time high of $118,399, indicating steady growth. Analyzing causes and future trends.

user avatarGiorgi Kostiuk

Ant Group and Circle Join Forces to Integrate USDC into AntChain

chest

Ant Group and Circle have announced a partnership to integrate USDC into AntChain, potentially transforming global financial infrastructure.

user avatarGiorgi Kostiuk
dapp expert logo
© 2020-2025. DappExpert. All rights reserved.
© 2020-2025. DappExpert. All rights reserved.

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.