• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M
DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

user avatar

by Elena Ryabokon

2 years ago


DeFi audits of projects based on zero-disclosure proof-of-concept (ZK) technology were twice as likely to reveal critical bugs compared to other projects, according to The Block citing a Veridise report.

The company's experts analyzed 1,605 vulnerabilities identified in 100 audits. On average, they found 16 issues per audit, with ZK projects having a higher rate of 18 bugs.

In terms of critical vulnerabilities, 55% (11 out of 20) of ZK projects contained such issues, compared to 27.5% (22 out of 80) for other projects.

Experts noted that the security of ZK solutions is “just more complicated” because of the complex cryptographic designs and the innovative nature of the protocols. Veridise co-founder and CEO John Stevens explained that designing a ZK scheme requires precise reasoning about the semantics of the operations in the witness generator. When these constructs are incorrectly encoded due to constraints, errors occur.According to Stevens : “It makes sense that there are more errors in these schemas because they are very different from the typical programming paradigm”.

Overall, the most common vulnerabilities found in the audits were logic errors (385), maintainability (355) and data validation (304). These categories accounted for 65% of all issues identified.

Veridise emphasized that insufficient maintainability is not a security vulnerability in the strict sense, but poor code writing practices are “one step away from creating critical vulnerabilities.”

For the ZK protocols, a specific problem was “insufficiently bounded loops”, which had a 90% probability of causing a serious error. This occurs when arithmetic scheme constraints do not provide sufficient conditions to verify the correctness of the computation. Veridise noted that such conditions do not exist in traditional smart contracts.

This means that an attacker could create a proof that tricks the checker into accepting a false statement as true, seriously undermining the integrity of the protocol.

Recall, ForkLog talked about the development of ZK protocols in 2024 in an exclusive piece.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Japanese Regulators Issue Guidance on Crypto in Real Estate

chest

Japanese regulators have issued guidance on compliance requirements for cryptocurrency in real estate to mitigate money laundering risks.

user avatarBayarjavkhlan Ganbaatar

Analysts Warn of Potential Bitcoin Correction Following Fed Meeting

chest

Analysts warn that Bitcoin may face significant corrections following the Federal Reserve's upcoming meeting and potential leadership change.

user avatarMohamed Farouk

Ethereum Surpasses 190 Million Holders, Leaving Bitcoin Behind

chest

Ethereum is nearing 190 million holders, significantly surpassing Bitcoin's 59.1 million wallets, indicating a growing adoption gap.

user avatarElias Mukuru

Bitcoin Coinbase Premium Gap Turns Negative After 20-Day Positive Streak

chest

The Coinbase Premium Gap for Bitcoin has shifted to negative for the first time in 20 days, indicating a change in buying and selling behavior among American investors.

user avatarDiego Alvarez

Digital Asset Sector Sees Positive Net Capital Inflows

chest

The digital asset sector has experienced a significant shift with positive net capital inflows for the first time since December, with combined monthly netflows into Bitcoin, Ethereum, and stablecoins surging to a positive value of $3 billion.

user avatarKenji Takahashi

Bitcoin Options Market Shifts with IBIT Dominance

chest

Jeff Park discusses the impact of IBIT options on Bitcoin's volatility and potential price movements.

user avatarMaria Fernandez

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.