• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M
DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

user avatar

by Elena Ryabokon

a year ago


DeFi audits of projects based on zero-disclosure proof-of-concept (ZK) technology were twice as likely to reveal critical bugs compared to other projects, according to The Block citing a Veridise report.

The company's experts analyzed 1,605 vulnerabilities identified in 100 audits. On average, they found 16 issues per audit, with ZK projects having a higher rate of 18 bugs.

In terms of critical vulnerabilities, 55% (11 out of 20) of ZK projects contained such issues, compared to 27.5% (22 out of 80) for other projects.

Experts noted that the security of ZK solutions is “just more complicated” because of the complex cryptographic designs and the innovative nature of the protocols. Veridise co-founder and CEO John Stevens explained that designing a ZK scheme requires precise reasoning about the semantics of the operations in the witness generator. When these constructs are incorrectly encoded due to constraints, errors occur.According to Stevens : “It makes sense that there are more errors in these schemas because they are very different from the typical programming paradigm”.

Overall, the most common vulnerabilities found in the audits were logic errors (385), maintainability (355) and data validation (304). These categories accounted for 65% of all issues identified.

Veridise emphasized that insufficient maintainability is not a security vulnerability in the strict sense, but poor code writing practices are “one step away from creating critical vulnerabilities.”

For the ZK protocols, a specific problem was “insufficiently bounded loops”, which had a 90% probability of causing a serious error. This occurs when arithmetic scheme constraints do not provide sufficient conditions to verify the correctness of the computation. Veridise noted that such conditions do not exist in traditional smart contracts.

This means that an attacker could create a proof that tricks the checker into accepting a false statement as true, seriously undermining the integrity of the protocol.

Recall, ForkLog talked about the development of ZK protocols in 2024 in an exclusive piece.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Crypto VC Sector Thrives in 2025

chest

The cryptocurrency venture capital sector saw significant investment activity in 2025, with over $171 billion raised for blockchain startups.

user avatarArif Mukhtar

Funding Trends in Crypto VC for 2025

chest

In 2025, crypto startups raised $171.37 billion across 10,582 funding rounds, showcasing a diverse range of funding sizes that reflect different stages of growth.

user avatarMiguel Rodriguez

Ramp Network Bridges Fiat and Crypto for Easy Transactions

chest

Ramp Network provides services for converting fiat currency to crypto and vice versa, facilitating easier access to the crypto world.

user avatarLuis Flores

VivoPower Acquires Norwegian Data Center for AI Transition

chest

VivoPower International PLC has announced its agreement to acquire a 40MW energized data center in Norway, transitioning it from blockchain hosting to an AI hub.

user avatarMaria Gutierrez

KuCoin Unveils KIA, Its New AI Assistant for the Crypto Market

chest

KuCoin has launched KIA, a proprietary AI assistant designed to enhance user interaction with the crypto market through real-time insights and simplified analysis.

user avatarAndrew Smith

Ari Redbord Highlights AI's Threat to Crypto Security in Congressional Testimony

chest

Ari Redbord, the Global Head of Policy at TRM Labs, testified before Congress about the rising threat of AI in crypto crimes, predicting a significant increase by 2026 and emphasizing the need for advanced countermeasures.

user avatarJacob Williams

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.