• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M
DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

user avatar

by Elena Ryabokon

2 years ago


DeFi audits of projects based on zero-disclosure proof-of-concept (ZK) technology were twice as likely to reveal critical bugs compared to other projects, according to The Block citing a Veridise report.

The company's experts analyzed 1,605 vulnerabilities identified in 100 audits. On average, they found 16 issues per audit, with ZK projects having a higher rate of 18 bugs.

In terms of critical vulnerabilities, 55% (11 out of 20) of ZK projects contained such issues, compared to 27.5% (22 out of 80) for other projects.

Experts noted that the security of ZK solutions is “just more complicated” because of the complex cryptographic designs and the innovative nature of the protocols. Veridise co-founder and CEO John Stevens explained that designing a ZK scheme requires precise reasoning about the semantics of the operations in the witness generator. When these constructs are incorrectly encoded due to constraints, errors occur.According to Stevens : “It makes sense that there are more errors in these schemas because they are very different from the typical programming paradigm”.

Overall, the most common vulnerabilities found in the audits were logic errors (385), maintainability (355) and data validation (304). These categories accounted for 65% of all issues identified.

Veridise emphasized that insufficient maintainability is not a security vulnerability in the strict sense, but poor code writing practices are “one step away from creating critical vulnerabilities.”

For the ZK protocols, a specific problem was “insufficiently bounded loops”, which had a 90% probability of causing a serious error. This occurs when arithmetic scheme constraints do not provide sufficient conditions to verify the correctness of the computation. Veridise noted that such conditions do not exist in traditional smart contracts.

This means that an attacker could create a proof that tricks the checker into accepting a false statement as true, seriously undermining the integrity of the protocol.

Recall, ForkLog talked about the development of ZK protocols in 2024 in an exclusive piece.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Dogecoin Faces Technical Pressure Amid Market Weakness

chest

Dogecoin is struggling to maintain support levels at 0.01053 amid market weakness, facing technical pressure and bearish signals.

user avatarRajesh Kumar

Moltbook Exposes Security Flaws and Fake Accounts

chest

A recent investigation by cybersecurity company Wiz has revealed that Moltbook's 15 million so-called independent agents are largely fake, with only 17,000 real users behind these accounts.

user avatarTando Nkube

Stacks STX Shows Signs of Recovery After Downtrend

chest

Stacks STX is showing signs of recovery as it moves out of a long downtrend and enters a base-building phase.

user avatarMaria Gutierrez

2026 Marks a Turning Point for Real-World Asset Tokenization

chest

2026 marks a turning point for real-world asset tokenization, focusing on market liquidity and compliance.

user avatarTando Nkube

Trump Confirms DOJ's Ongoing Investigation into Federal Reserve Renovation Costs

chest

President Trump confirmed that the US Department of Justice will persist in its criminal investigation of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell regarding the costly renovation of the Fed's headquarters.

user avatarKofi Adjeman

Crypto Users Face Massive Losses Due to Address Copying Mistakes

chest

Crypto users are facing significant financial losses due to mistakes in copying wallet addresses, with losses exceeding $122 million in January and $50 million in December.

user avatarMaria Gutierrez

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.