• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M
DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

user avatar

by Elena Ryabokon

2 years ago


DeFi audits of projects based on zero-disclosure proof-of-concept (ZK) technology were twice as likely to reveal critical bugs compared to other projects, according to The Block citing a Veridise report.

The company's experts analyzed 1,605 vulnerabilities identified in 100 audits. On average, they found 16 issues per audit, with ZK projects having a higher rate of 18 bugs.

In terms of critical vulnerabilities, 55% (11 out of 20) of ZK projects contained such issues, compared to 27.5% (22 out of 80) for other projects.

Experts noted that the security of ZK solutions is “just more complicated” because of the complex cryptographic designs and the innovative nature of the protocols. Veridise co-founder and CEO John Stevens explained that designing a ZK scheme requires precise reasoning about the semantics of the operations in the witness generator. When these constructs are incorrectly encoded due to constraints, errors occur.According to Stevens : “It makes sense that there are more errors in these schemas because they are very different from the typical programming paradigm”.

Overall, the most common vulnerabilities found in the audits were logic errors (385), maintainability (355) and data validation (304). These categories accounted for 65% of all issues identified.

Veridise emphasized that insufficient maintainability is not a security vulnerability in the strict sense, but poor code writing practices are “one step away from creating critical vulnerabilities.”

For the ZK protocols, a specific problem was “insufficiently bounded loops”, which had a 90% probability of causing a serious error. This occurs when arithmetic scheme constraints do not provide sufficient conditions to verify the correctness of the computation. Veridise noted that such conditions do not exist in traditional smart contracts.

This means that an attacker could create a proof that tricks the checker into accepting a false statement as true, seriously undermining the integrity of the protocol.

Recall, ForkLog talked about the development of ZK protocols in 2024 in an exclusive piece.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Ethereum Experiences Significant Price Drop Below $1,800

chest

Ethereum's price has recently crashed below the $1,800 mark, reaching a low of $1,536, raising concerns among investors about its future performance.

user avatarAisha Farooq

Ethereum's RSI Reaches Lowest Point Since 2015

chest

Ethereum's monthly RSI has dropped to around 40, its lowest since 2015, following a price crash below $1,800, raising speculation about potential future price movements.

user avatarLi Weicheng

Dormant SHIB Wallet Reactivated, Transferring Billions of Tokens

chest

A long-dormant Shiba Inu wallet has been reactivated, transferring nearly 400 billion tokens, raising questions about market implications.

user avatarTenzin Dorje

Shiba Inu Futures Positions Liquidated Amid Market Turmoil

chest

Over 382,000 Shiba Inu futures positions were liquidated in a single day, primarily impacting long traders.

user avatarBayarjavkhlan Ganbaatar

Legal Dispute Between Justin Sun and WLFI Escalates

chest

The legal conflict between Justin Sun and World Liberty Financial intensifies as both parties file lawsuits against each other.

user avatarMohamed Farouk

HTX Delists USD1 Stablecoin Amid Ongoing Dispute

chest

HTX has announced the delisting of USD1, a stablecoin associated with World Liberty Financial, due to tensions between Justin Sun and WLFI. Users holding USD1 will have their balances converted to USDT at a 1:1 rate.

user avatarElias Mukuru

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.