• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M
DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

user avatar

by Elena Ryabokon

2 years ago


DeFi audits of projects based on zero-disclosure proof-of-concept (ZK) technology were twice as likely to reveal critical bugs compared to other projects, according to The Block citing a Veridise report.

The company's experts analyzed 1,605 vulnerabilities identified in 100 audits. On average, they found 16 issues per audit, with ZK projects having a higher rate of 18 bugs.

In terms of critical vulnerabilities, 55% (11 out of 20) of ZK projects contained such issues, compared to 27.5% (22 out of 80) for other projects.

Experts noted that the security of ZK solutions is “just more complicated” because of the complex cryptographic designs and the innovative nature of the protocols. Veridise co-founder and CEO John Stevens explained that designing a ZK scheme requires precise reasoning about the semantics of the operations in the witness generator. When these constructs are incorrectly encoded due to constraints, errors occur.According to Stevens : “It makes sense that there are more errors in these schemas because they are very different from the typical programming paradigm”.

Overall, the most common vulnerabilities found in the audits were logic errors (385), maintainability (355) and data validation (304). These categories accounted for 65% of all issues identified.

Veridise emphasized that insufficient maintainability is not a security vulnerability in the strict sense, but poor code writing practices are “one step away from creating critical vulnerabilities.”

For the ZK protocols, a specific problem was “insufficiently bounded loops”, which had a 90% probability of causing a serious error. This occurs when arithmetic scheme constraints do not provide sufficient conditions to verify the correctness of the computation. Veridise noted that such conditions do not exist in traditional smart contracts.

This means that an attacker could create a proof that tricks the checker into accepting a false statement as true, seriously undermining the integrity of the protocol.

Recall, ForkLog talked about the development of ZK protocols in 2024 in an exclusive piece.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Ethereum Buy Orders Surge as Whales Go Long

chest

Buy orders for Ethereum are rising as whales show strong confidence and interest in the cryptocurrency market.

user avatarKenji Takahashi

Ethereum Supply Concentration Among Whales Reaches New High

chest

The concentration of Ethereum among large wallet holders has surged, with whales now controlling over 22% of the total supply.

user avatarDiego Alvarez

Cardano Enhances Connectivity with Major Blockchain Networks

chest

Cardano is making significant strides in improving its interoperability with other major blockchain networks, enhancing user experience and opportunities.

user avatarMaria Fernandez

Ethereum Developer Recovers 1,000 ETH from 2016 ICO

chest

An Ethereum developer known as 0xFlorent has successfully recovered over 1,000 ETH from a failed 2016 crypto project, allowing 48 original investors to claim their previously inaccessible funds.

user avatarGustavo Mendoza

Ripple's Payment Documentation Sparks Interest Among XRP Supporters

chest

A directory in Ripple's Payments documentation has revealed over 500 financial institution identifiers, renewing interest in XRP's potential role in global payments.

user avatarRajesh Kumar

XRP Ledger's Resilience Under Attack Conditions Stressed by Analysts

chest

Analysts emphasize the XRP Ledger's ability to withstand extreme conditions and attacks, making it a reliable choice for financial infrastructure.

user avatarMiguel Rodriguez

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.