• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M
DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

user avatar

by Elena Ryabokon

2 years ago


DeFi audits of projects based on zero-disclosure proof-of-concept (ZK) technology were twice as likely to reveal critical bugs compared to other projects, according to The Block citing a Veridise report.

The company's experts analyzed 1,605 vulnerabilities identified in 100 audits. On average, they found 16 issues per audit, with ZK projects having a higher rate of 18 bugs.

In terms of critical vulnerabilities, 55% (11 out of 20) of ZK projects contained such issues, compared to 27.5% (22 out of 80) for other projects.

Experts noted that the security of ZK solutions is “just more complicated” because of the complex cryptographic designs and the innovative nature of the protocols. Veridise co-founder and CEO John Stevens explained that designing a ZK scheme requires precise reasoning about the semantics of the operations in the witness generator. When these constructs are incorrectly encoded due to constraints, errors occur.According to Stevens : “It makes sense that there are more errors in these schemas because they are very different from the typical programming paradigm”.

Overall, the most common vulnerabilities found in the audits were logic errors (385), maintainability (355) and data validation (304). These categories accounted for 65% of all issues identified.

Veridise emphasized that insufficient maintainability is not a security vulnerability in the strict sense, but poor code writing practices are “one step away from creating critical vulnerabilities.”

For the ZK protocols, a specific problem was “insufficiently bounded loops”, which had a 90% probability of causing a serious error. This occurs when arithmetic scheme constraints do not provide sufficient conditions to verify the correctness of the computation. Veridise noted that such conditions do not exist in traditional smart contracts.

This means that an attacker could create a proof that tricks the checker into accepting a false statement as true, seriously undermining the integrity of the protocol.

Recall, ForkLog talked about the development of ZK protocols in 2024 in an exclusive piece.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Arbitrum Governance Proposes Major Funding for Foundation

chest

Arbitrum governance is evaluating a funding proposal for the Arbitrum Foundation, seeking 16 million in real-world assets, 1,700 ETH, and 230 million ARB tokens to support its operations for another year.

user avatarLuis Flores

Crypto Scammers Target 2026 World Cup Fans

chest

TRM Labs warns of emerging crypto scams targeting fans of the 2026 World Cup, including fake ticketing and speculative tokens.

user avatarArif Mukhtar

Ethereum Researchers Introduce SPHINCS for Quantum-Resistant Signatures

chest

Ethereum researchers introduce SPHINCS, a post-quantum signature design for enhancing wallet security against quantum computing threats.

user avatarDavid Robinson

Bitcoin Faces Major Liquidation Event Amid Price Fluctuations

chest

Bitcoin traders faced significant liquidations as the price fluctuated sharply, resulting in nearly $980 million in liquidations within 24 hours.

user avatarMaria Gutierrez

Sky Governance Forum Emphasizes Editorial Policy

chest

The Sky Governance Forum has established a strict editorial policy that focuses on accuracy, relevance, and impartiality.

user avatarAndrew Smith

Ethereum Derivatives Show Bearish Sentiment as Funding Turns Negative

chest

Ethereum derivatives have experienced negative funding rates since June 5, indicating a bearish bias in the market.

user avatarJacob Williams

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.