• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M
DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

user avatar

by Elena Ryabokon

2 years ago


DeFi audits of projects based on zero-disclosure proof-of-concept (ZK) technology were twice as likely to reveal critical bugs compared to other projects, according to The Block citing a Veridise report.

The company's experts analyzed 1,605 vulnerabilities identified in 100 audits. On average, they found 16 issues per audit, with ZK projects having a higher rate of 18 bugs.

In terms of critical vulnerabilities, 55% (11 out of 20) of ZK projects contained such issues, compared to 27.5% (22 out of 80) for other projects.

Experts noted that the security of ZK solutions is “just more complicated” because of the complex cryptographic designs and the innovative nature of the protocols. Veridise co-founder and CEO John Stevens explained that designing a ZK scheme requires precise reasoning about the semantics of the operations in the witness generator. When these constructs are incorrectly encoded due to constraints, errors occur.According to Stevens : “It makes sense that there are more errors in these schemas because they are very different from the typical programming paradigm”.

Overall, the most common vulnerabilities found in the audits were logic errors (385), maintainability (355) and data validation (304). These categories accounted for 65% of all issues identified.

Veridise emphasized that insufficient maintainability is not a security vulnerability in the strict sense, but poor code writing practices are “one step away from creating critical vulnerabilities.”

For the ZK protocols, a specific problem was “insufficiently bounded loops”, which had a 90% probability of causing a serious error. This occurs when arithmetic scheme constraints do not provide sufficient conditions to verify the correctness of the computation. Veridise noted that such conditions do not exist in traditional smart contracts.

This means that an attacker could create a proof that tricks the checker into accepting a false statement as true, seriously undermining the integrity of the protocol.

Recall, ForkLog talked about the development of ZK protocols in 2024 in an exclusive piece.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Ripple Secures Preliminary CASP License Approval in Luxembourg

chest

Ripple has secured preliminary approval for a CASP license from Luxembourg's CSSF, marking a significant step in its operations.

user avatarNguyen Van Long

Ripple and SBI Holdings Launch RLUSD Stablecoin in Japan

chest

Ripple has partnered with SBI VC Trade to launch the RLUSD stablecoin in Japan after receiving approval from the Japan Financial Services Agency.

user avatarJesper Sørensen

OpenAI's GPT56 Model Naming Causes Confusion in Crypto Markets

chest

OpenAI's recent announcement of naming its GPT56 model capability tiers as Sol, Terra, and Luna has led to significant discussions within the crypto community.

user avatarSatoshi Nakamura

Crypto Market Seeks Direction Amid X Money Launch

chest

The launch of X Money arrives at a crucial moment for the crypto market, where assets are striving for a clearer direction.

user avatarRajesh Kumar

Current Report Utilizes Data from Coinglass

chest

The current report utilizes data sourced from Coinglass, ensuring that the information presented is accurate and relevant.

user avatarLucas Weissmann

Security Alert: MEV Bot JaredfromSubwayeth Exploited

chest

A security alert has been issued regarding the MEV bot known as JaredfromSubwayeth, which was exploited on June 26, 2026, raising concerns about the security of MEV bots in the blockchain environment.

user avatarFilippo Romano

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.