• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M
DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

user avatar

by Elena Ryabokon

2 years ago


DeFi audits of projects based on zero-disclosure proof-of-concept (ZK) technology were twice as likely to reveal critical bugs compared to other projects, according to The Block citing a Veridise report.

The company's experts analyzed 1,605 vulnerabilities identified in 100 audits. On average, they found 16 issues per audit, with ZK projects having a higher rate of 18 bugs.

In terms of critical vulnerabilities, 55% (11 out of 20) of ZK projects contained such issues, compared to 27.5% (22 out of 80) for other projects.

Experts noted that the security of ZK solutions is “just more complicated” because of the complex cryptographic designs and the innovative nature of the protocols. Veridise co-founder and CEO John Stevens explained that designing a ZK scheme requires precise reasoning about the semantics of the operations in the witness generator. When these constructs are incorrectly encoded due to constraints, errors occur.According to Stevens : “It makes sense that there are more errors in these schemas because they are very different from the typical programming paradigm”.

Overall, the most common vulnerabilities found in the audits were logic errors (385), maintainability (355) and data validation (304). These categories accounted for 65% of all issues identified.

Veridise emphasized that insufficient maintainability is not a security vulnerability in the strict sense, but poor code writing practices are “one step away from creating critical vulnerabilities.”

For the ZK protocols, a specific problem was “insufficiently bounded loops”, which had a 90% probability of causing a serious error. This occurs when arithmetic scheme constraints do not provide sufficient conditions to verify the correctness of the computation. Veridise noted that such conditions do not exist in traditional smart contracts.

This means that an attacker could create a proof that tricks the checker into accepting a false statement as true, seriously undermining the integrity of the protocol.

Recall, ForkLog talked about the development of ZK protocols in 2024 in an exclusive piece.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Solana Faces Market Challenges as It Struggles to Keep Up with Ethereum

chest

Market expert Dominic Basulto identifies three key reasons for Solana's underperformance compared to Ethereum, including its association with meme coins, struggles in building a mobile-first ecosystem, and limited ETF momentum.

user avatarTenzin Dorje

XRP Remains Trapped in Compression as Momentum Continues to Fade

chest

XRP is currently consolidating near the 136 region, showing a lack of directional conviction and a tight trading range.

user avatarMohamed Farouk

XRP Struggles Below 140 as Market Faces Indecision

chest

XRP struggles to break above 140 as the market faces indecision, with high open interest on Binance indicating potential volatility.

user avatarBayarjavkhlan Ganbaatar

Solana's Price Action Indicates Potential Short-Term Recovery

chest

Solana is currently in a cautious consolidation phase, with signs of a possible temporary recovery before the next major market move.

user avatarElias Mukuru

Altcoin Dominance Shows Signs of Potential Recovery

chest

Crypto analyst Cryptollica indicates that altcoin dominance is at a long-term bottom, suggesting a potential recovery phase for altcoins.

user avatarDiego Alvarez

FET Faces Inflow Drought Amidst Price Consolidation

chest

FET has been consolidating above 0.20, but a significant drop in exchange inflows and participant activity on Binance indicates a structural inflow drought.

user avatarKenji Takahashi

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.