• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M
DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

user avatar

by Elena Ryabokon

2 years ago


DeFi audits of projects based on zero-disclosure proof-of-concept (ZK) technology were twice as likely to reveal critical bugs compared to other projects, according to The Block citing a Veridise report.

The company's experts analyzed 1,605 vulnerabilities identified in 100 audits. On average, they found 16 issues per audit, with ZK projects having a higher rate of 18 bugs.

In terms of critical vulnerabilities, 55% (11 out of 20) of ZK projects contained such issues, compared to 27.5% (22 out of 80) for other projects.

Experts noted that the security of ZK solutions is “just more complicated” because of the complex cryptographic designs and the innovative nature of the protocols. Veridise co-founder and CEO John Stevens explained that designing a ZK scheme requires precise reasoning about the semantics of the operations in the witness generator. When these constructs are incorrectly encoded due to constraints, errors occur.According to Stevens : “It makes sense that there are more errors in these schemas because they are very different from the typical programming paradigm”.

Overall, the most common vulnerabilities found in the audits were logic errors (385), maintainability (355) and data validation (304). These categories accounted for 65% of all issues identified.

Veridise emphasized that insufficient maintainability is not a security vulnerability in the strict sense, but poor code writing practices are “one step away from creating critical vulnerabilities.”

For the ZK protocols, a specific problem was “insufficiently bounded loops”, which had a 90% probability of causing a serious error. This occurs when arithmetic scheme constraints do not provide sufficient conditions to verify the correctness of the computation. Veridise noted that such conditions do not exist in traditional smart contracts.

This means that an attacker could create a proof that tricks the checker into accepting a false statement as true, seriously undermining the integrity of the protocol.

Recall, ForkLog talked about the development of ZK protocols in 2024 in an exclusive piece.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Crypto Investment Funds Face Continued Outflows Amid Market Slowdown

chest

Crypto investment funds have faced a fifth consecutive week of net outflows, totaling approximately $4 billion over five weeks, with a significant decline in trading activity.

user avatarAyman Ben Youssef

Blockchain Association Unveils New Tax Principles for Digital Assets

chest

The Blockchain Association has introduced a framework to guide lawmakers on digital asset taxation as discussions around the CLARITY Act continue.

user avatarSon Min-ho

Market Leverage Ratio Declines, Indicating Reduced Speculative Positioning

chest

The Estimated Leverage Ratio in the crypto derivatives market has sharply declined, suggesting a reduction in speculative positioning and a calmer market environment.

user avatarTando Nkube

Castle Labs Warns of Overbuilt Crypto Market

chest

Castle Labs warns that the cryptocurrency market is overbuilt, with most tokens likely to lose value unless they demonstrate real business traction.

user avatarKofi Adjeman

Bitcoin Mining Difficulty Rebounds, Indicating Network Resilience

chest

Bitcoin mining difficulty has rebounded after a brief dip, indicating renewed miner participation and confidence in Bitcoin's long-term viability.

user avatarNguyen Van Long

Jameson Lopp Raises Alarm Over BIP110's Risks

chest

Jameson Lopp escalates his criticism of the BIP110 proposal, warning it could lead to a disruptive Bitcoin chain split.

user avatarSatoshi Nakamura

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.