• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M
DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

user avatar

by Elena Ryabokon

2 years ago


DeFi audits of projects based on zero-disclosure proof-of-concept (ZK) technology were twice as likely to reveal critical bugs compared to other projects, according to The Block citing a Veridise report.

The company's experts analyzed 1,605 vulnerabilities identified in 100 audits. On average, they found 16 issues per audit, with ZK projects having a higher rate of 18 bugs.

In terms of critical vulnerabilities, 55% (11 out of 20) of ZK projects contained such issues, compared to 27.5% (22 out of 80) for other projects.

Experts noted that the security of ZK solutions is “just more complicated” because of the complex cryptographic designs and the innovative nature of the protocols. Veridise co-founder and CEO John Stevens explained that designing a ZK scheme requires precise reasoning about the semantics of the operations in the witness generator. When these constructs are incorrectly encoded due to constraints, errors occur.According to Stevens : “It makes sense that there are more errors in these schemas because they are very different from the typical programming paradigm”.

Overall, the most common vulnerabilities found in the audits were logic errors (385), maintainability (355) and data validation (304). These categories accounted for 65% of all issues identified.

Veridise emphasized that insufficient maintainability is not a security vulnerability in the strict sense, but poor code writing practices are “one step away from creating critical vulnerabilities.”

For the ZK protocols, a specific problem was “insufficiently bounded loops”, which had a 90% probability of causing a serious error. This occurs when arithmetic scheme constraints do not provide sufficient conditions to verify the correctness of the computation. Veridise noted that such conditions do not exist in traditional smart contracts.

This means that an attacker could create a proof that tricks the checker into accepting a false statement as true, seriously undermining the integrity of the protocol.

Recall, ForkLog talked about the development of ZK protocols in 2024 in an exclusive piece.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Poland's Finance Minister Advocates for Keeping the Zloty

chest

Poland's Finance Minister Andrzej Domanski advocates for retaining the zloty, citing superior economic performance compared to eurozone nations.

user avatarMaria Gutierrez

The Future of Bitcoin Mining: What Happens After 2140?

chest

As Bitcoin approaches its maximum supply of 21 million coins expected to be mined by 2140, the future of mining revenue is under scrutiny. Miners currently earn rewards through block rewards and transaction fees, but concerns arise about sustainability once the supply limit is reached.

user avatarDavid Robinson

XRP ETFs Record First Weekly Outflow

chest

XRP ETFs recorded their first weekly outflow at 40.64 million during the week ending January 23, marking a significant shift after three consecutive weeks of inflows.

user avatarNguyen Van Long

Ethereum ETFs Face Major Withdrawals

chest

Ethereum ETFs experienced 611 million in outflows during the week ending January 23, primarily driven by BlackRock's ETHA fund.

user avatarKofi Adjeman

Mutuum Finance Plans Overcollateralized Stablecoin and Layer 2 Expansion

chest

The project aims to introduce an overcollateralized stablecoin and expand to Layer 2 solutions to reduce fees.

user avatarFilippo Romano

China Approaches Largest Government Bitcoin Holder Status

chest

China is nearing the United States in Bitcoin holdings, potentially becoming the largest government holder.

user avatarAndrew Smith

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.