• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M
DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

user avatar

by Elena Ryabokon

a year ago


DeFi audits of projects based on zero-disclosure proof-of-concept (ZK) technology were twice as likely to reveal critical bugs compared to other projects, according to The Block citing a Veridise report.

The company's experts analyzed 1,605 vulnerabilities identified in 100 audits. On average, they found 16 issues per audit, with ZK projects having a higher rate of 18 bugs.

In terms of critical vulnerabilities, 55% (11 out of 20) of ZK projects contained such issues, compared to 27.5% (22 out of 80) for other projects.

Experts noted that the security of ZK solutions is “just more complicated” because of the complex cryptographic designs and the innovative nature of the protocols. Veridise co-founder and CEO John Stevens explained that designing a ZK scheme requires precise reasoning about the semantics of the operations in the witness generator. When these constructs are incorrectly encoded due to constraints, errors occur.According to Stevens : “It makes sense that there are more errors in these schemas because they are very different from the typical programming paradigm”.

Overall, the most common vulnerabilities found in the audits were logic errors (385), maintainability (355) and data validation (304). These categories accounted for 65% of all issues identified.

Veridise emphasized that insufficient maintainability is not a security vulnerability in the strict sense, but poor code writing practices are “one step away from creating critical vulnerabilities.”

For the ZK protocols, a specific problem was “insufficiently bounded loops”, which had a 90% probability of causing a serious error. This occurs when arithmetic scheme constraints do not provide sufficient conditions to verify the correctness of the computation. Veridise noted that such conditions do not exist in traditional smart contracts.

This means that an attacker could create a proof that tricks the checker into accepting a false statement as true, seriously undermining the integrity of the protocol.

Recall, ForkLog talked about the development of ZK protocols in 2024 in an exclusive piece.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Centralized Exchanges Suffer Major Losses Due to Security Failures

chest

Centralized exchanges faced significant losses in 2025, totaling over $357 million, primarily due to operational security failures.

user avatarBayarjavkhlan Ganbaatar

Amir Zaidi Rejoins CFTC as Chief of Staff.

chest

Amir Zaidi has been appointed as the Chief of Staff at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), marking his return to the agency after a six-year absence.

user avatarTenzin Dorje

Mutuum Finance Completes Independent Audit, Enhances Security

chest

Mutuum Finance has completed an independent audit by Halborn Security, enhancing its platform's security.

user avatarMohamed Farouk

APEMARS APRZ Introduces Unique Features to Attract Early Investors

chest

APEMARS APRZ has generated interest by offering a unique concept in the crowded market, featuring a structured burn system and a step-based presale pricing model to attract early investors.

user avatarDiego Alvarez

Lessons from Solana: APEMARS Offers New Opportunities for Investors

chest

The success of Solana serves as a reminder of the potential gains from early investment, with APEMARS providing a similar opportunity for investors who missed out on Solana's early days.

user avatarKenji Takahashi

Bitcoin Holders Are in Profit But the Market Isn't Euphoric Yet

chest

A recent CryptoQuant report indicates that while most active Bitcoin holders are in profit, the market has not reached euphoric conditions typical of late-cycle tops.

user avatarElias Mukuru

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.