• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M
DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

user avatar

by Elena Ryabokon

2 years ago


DeFi audits of projects based on zero-disclosure proof-of-concept (ZK) technology were twice as likely to reveal critical bugs compared to other projects, according to The Block citing a Veridise report.

The company's experts analyzed 1,605 vulnerabilities identified in 100 audits. On average, they found 16 issues per audit, with ZK projects having a higher rate of 18 bugs.

In terms of critical vulnerabilities, 55% (11 out of 20) of ZK projects contained such issues, compared to 27.5% (22 out of 80) for other projects.

Experts noted that the security of ZK solutions is “just more complicated” because of the complex cryptographic designs and the innovative nature of the protocols. Veridise co-founder and CEO John Stevens explained that designing a ZK scheme requires precise reasoning about the semantics of the operations in the witness generator. When these constructs are incorrectly encoded due to constraints, errors occur.According to Stevens : “It makes sense that there are more errors in these schemas because they are very different from the typical programming paradigm”.

Overall, the most common vulnerabilities found in the audits were logic errors (385), maintainability (355) and data validation (304). These categories accounted for 65% of all issues identified.

Veridise emphasized that insufficient maintainability is not a security vulnerability in the strict sense, but poor code writing practices are “one step away from creating critical vulnerabilities.”

For the ZK protocols, a specific problem was “insufficiently bounded loops”, which had a 90% probability of causing a serious error. This occurs when arithmetic scheme constraints do not provide sufficient conditions to verify the correctness of the computation. Veridise noted that such conditions do not exist in traditional smart contracts.

This means that an attacker could create a proof that tricks the checker into accepting a false statement as true, seriously undermining the integrity of the protocol.

Recall, ForkLog talked about the development of ZK protocols in 2024 in an exclusive piece.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Grayscale Submits Form 8K for Solana Staking ETF with Cash Payouts

chest

Grayscale has filed a new Form 8K with the SEC for its Solana Staking ETF, allowing quarterly cash payouts of staking rewards to shareholders.

user avatarZainab Kamara

Arbitrum Foundation Proposes $43 Million Budget for 2027

chest

The Arbitrum Foundation has proposed a significant budget of $43 million for 2027 to support operational and growth initiatives, raising discussions on DAO funding strategies and questions about spending transparency.

user avatarSon Min-ho

Ethereum Foundation Integrates AI for Enhanced Protocol Security

chest

The Ethereum Foundation's Protocol Security team is utilizing AI agents to improve the scanning of protocol repositories and devnets for vulnerabilities.

user avatarAyman Ben Youssef

Ethereum ETFs Experience Positive Inflows Amid Institutional Interest

chest

Ethereum ETFs have recorded a third consecutive day of net inflows, indicating improving institutional demand.

user avatarTando Nkube

Utz Brands Inc Stock Surges 89% Amid Intersnack Group Acquisition Announcement

chest

Utz Brands Inc stock surged 89% after Intersnack Group announced a $2.9 billion acquisition.

user avatarKofi Adjeman

Render Completes 98% Migration to Solana

chest

Render Foundation announces that 98.4% of the RNDR token supply has successfully migrated to the native RENDER token on Solana.

user avatarNguyen Van Long

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.