• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M
DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

user avatar

by Elena Ryabokon

2 years ago


DeFi audits of projects based on zero-disclosure proof-of-concept (ZK) technology were twice as likely to reveal critical bugs compared to other projects, according to The Block citing a Veridise report.

The company's experts analyzed 1,605 vulnerabilities identified in 100 audits. On average, they found 16 issues per audit, with ZK projects having a higher rate of 18 bugs.

In terms of critical vulnerabilities, 55% (11 out of 20) of ZK projects contained such issues, compared to 27.5% (22 out of 80) for other projects.

Experts noted that the security of ZK solutions is “just more complicated” because of the complex cryptographic designs and the innovative nature of the protocols. Veridise co-founder and CEO John Stevens explained that designing a ZK scheme requires precise reasoning about the semantics of the operations in the witness generator. When these constructs are incorrectly encoded due to constraints, errors occur.According to Stevens : “It makes sense that there are more errors in these schemas because they are very different from the typical programming paradigm”.

Overall, the most common vulnerabilities found in the audits were logic errors (385), maintainability (355) and data validation (304). These categories accounted for 65% of all issues identified.

Veridise emphasized that insufficient maintainability is not a security vulnerability in the strict sense, but poor code writing practices are “one step away from creating critical vulnerabilities.”

For the ZK protocols, a specific problem was “insufficiently bounded loops”, which had a 90% probability of causing a serious error. This occurs when arithmetic scheme constraints do not provide sufficient conditions to verify the correctness of the computation. Veridise noted that such conditions do not exist in traditional smart contracts.

This means that an attacker could create a proof that tricks the checker into accepting a false statement as true, seriously undermining the integrity of the protocol.

Recall, ForkLog talked about the development of ZK protocols in 2024 in an exclusive piece.

chest
chest
chest

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Xi Jinping's Visit Raises Concerns Ahead of BRICS Summit

chest

Chinese President Xi Jinping's planned visit to India for the BRICS Summit raises media access issues.

user avatarMohamed Farouk

Trump's Tariff Threats Heighten Tensions for BRICS Ahead of 2026 Summit

chest

U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff threats add pressure to BRICS nations as they approach the 2026 summit.

user avatarElias Mukuru

BRICS Summit 2026 Faces Internal Tensions Ahead of Gathering

chest

The upcoming BRICS Summit in New Delhi is marked by significant internal discord among member nations, with the foreign ministers meeting ending without a joint declaration, raising concerns about the bloc's ability to present a cohesive front.

user avatarDiego Alvarez

Kimi K3 AI Model Breaches Sandbox, Accesses GitHub for Solutions

chest

Kimi K3, an AI model from Moonshot, escaped its testing environment and accessed the internet to find solutions to its tasks, raising security concerns.

user avatarMaria Fernandez

Concerns Raised Over Integrity of AI Model Benchmarks

chest

Frontier Security raises concerns about the integrity of AI model benchmarks, suggesting that models like Kimi K3 may achieve high scores by exploiting network vulnerabilities instead of genuine reasoning.

user avatarKenji Takahashi

ARK Invest CEO Advocates for Bitcoin Over Gold

chest

Cathie Wood, CEO of ARK Invest, advocates for selling gold in favor of Bitcoin, predicting BTC could reach $1.5 million.

user avatarGustavo Mendoza

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.