• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M
DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

user avatar

by Elena Ryabokon

2 years ago


DeFi audits of projects based on zero-disclosure proof-of-concept (ZK) technology were twice as likely to reveal critical bugs compared to other projects, according to The Block citing a Veridise report.

The company's experts analyzed 1,605 vulnerabilities identified in 100 audits. On average, they found 16 issues per audit, with ZK projects having a higher rate of 18 bugs.

In terms of critical vulnerabilities, 55% (11 out of 20) of ZK projects contained such issues, compared to 27.5% (22 out of 80) for other projects.

Experts noted that the security of ZK solutions is “just more complicated” because of the complex cryptographic designs and the innovative nature of the protocols. Veridise co-founder and CEO John Stevens explained that designing a ZK scheme requires precise reasoning about the semantics of the operations in the witness generator. When these constructs are incorrectly encoded due to constraints, errors occur.According to Stevens : “It makes sense that there are more errors in these schemas because they are very different from the typical programming paradigm”.

Overall, the most common vulnerabilities found in the audits were logic errors (385), maintainability (355) and data validation (304). These categories accounted for 65% of all issues identified.

Veridise emphasized that insufficient maintainability is not a security vulnerability in the strict sense, but poor code writing practices are “one step away from creating critical vulnerabilities.”

For the ZK protocols, a specific problem was “insufficiently bounded loops”, which had a 90% probability of causing a serious error. This occurs when arithmetic scheme constraints do not provide sufficient conditions to verify the correctness of the computation. Veridise noted that such conditions do not exist in traditional smart contracts.

This means that an attacker could create a proof that tricks the checker into accepting a false statement as true, seriously undermining the integrity of the protocol.

Recall, ForkLog talked about the development of ZK protocols in 2024 in an exclusive piece.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

MEXC Launches ZAMA Launchpad for Digital Asset Subscription

chest

MEXC has launched the ZAMA Launchpad for digital asset subscription, allowing users to buy 750,000 ZAMA tokens with USDT at discounted rates from January 26 to February 2, 2026.

user avatarLi Weicheng

Cardano's Governance Strategy Prioritizes Antifragility and Community Engagement

chest

Cardano's governance strategy focuses on antifragility and community engagement to enhance decision-making and strengthen trust.

user avatarAisha Farooq

Ripple's Token Distribution Strategy Enhances Market Transparency

chest

Ripple's systematic reduction of XRP holdings has improved market transparency and liquidity while addressing centralization criticisms.

user avatarTenzin Dorje

Expert Insights on Ripple's Decentralization Model

chest

Experts highlight Ripple's hybrid token distribution model as a valuable framework for future blockchain projects.

user avatarBayarjavkhlan Ganbaatar

The Importance of Market Purification for Cryptocurrency Growth

chest

The Importance of Market Purification for Cryptocurrency Growth

user avatarMohamed Farouk

Kanalcoin Publishes Paid Promotional Article

chest

Kanalcoin has released a new paid promotional article submitted by an external partner. This content should not be interpreted as investment guidance or part of the editorial material.

user avatarDiego Alvarez

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.