• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M
DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

user avatar

by Elena Ryabokon

a year ago


DeFi audits of projects based on zero-disclosure proof-of-concept (ZK) technology were twice as likely to reveal critical bugs compared to other projects, according to The Block citing a Veridise report.

The company's experts analyzed 1,605 vulnerabilities identified in 100 audits. On average, they found 16 issues per audit, with ZK projects having a higher rate of 18 bugs.

In terms of critical vulnerabilities, 55% (11 out of 20) of ZK projects contained such issues, compared to 27.5% (22 out of 80) for other projects.

Experts noted that the security of ZK solutions is “just more complicated” because of the complex cryptographic designs and the innovative nature of the protocols. Veridise co-founder and CEO John Stevens explained that designing a ZK scheme requires precise reasoning about the semantics of the operations in the witness generator. When these constructs are incorrectly encoded due to constraints, errors occur.According to Stevens : “It makes sense that there are more errors in these schemas because they are very different from the typical programming paradigm”.

Overall, the most common vulnerabilities found in the audits were logic errors (385), maintainability (355) and data validation (304). These categories accounted for 65% of all issues identified.

Veridise emphasized that insufficient maintainability is not a security vulnerability in the strict sense, but poor code writing practices are “one step away from creating critical vulnerabilities.”

For the ZK protocols, a specific problem was “insufficiently bounded loops”, which had a 90% probability of causing a serious error. This occurs when arithmetic scheme constraints do not provide sufficient conditions to verify the correctness of the computation. Veridise noted that such conditions do not exist in traditional smart contracts.

This means that an attacker could create a proof that tricks the checker into accepting a false statement as true, seriously undermining the integrity of the protocol.

Recall, ForkLog talked about the development of ZK protocols in 2024 in an exclusive piece.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Regulatory Pressure Mounts on Crypto ATMs Amid Fraud Concerns

chest

US regulators and local governments are increasing scrutiny and imposing restrictions on crypto ATMs due to rising fraud complaints.

user avatarLuis Flores

Bitcoin Munari Launch Strategy Integrates Bitcoin and Solana

chest

Bitcoin Munari combines Bitcoin's fixed supply model with Solana's performance characteristics to create a unique digital asset.

user avatarMaria Gutierrez

Bitcoin Munari's Validator System Enhances Participation

chest

The validator system of Bitcoin Munari combines predictable economics with accessible participation routes, allowing users to engage in the network through various staking options.

user avatarArif Mukhtar

Aerodrome Finance Investigates DNS Hijacking Incident

chest

Aerodrome Finance is investigating a DNS hijacking incident that redirected users to phishing sites, while smart contracts remain secure.

user avatarDavid Robinson

Binance Futures to Delist USDM PORT3USDT Perpetual Contract

chest

Binance Futures has announced the delisting of the USDM PORT3USDT Perpetual Contract effective November 23, 2025.

user avatarAndrew Smith

Arbitrum (ARB) Faces Critical Support Level Amid Two-Year Downtrend

chest

Arbitrum's token ARB is currently trapped in a bearish channel, down nearly 90% from its peak in 2024, hovering just above the critical support level of 0.137.

user avatarJacob Williams

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.