DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

user avatar

by Elena Ryabokon

2 years ago


DeFi audits of projects based on zero-disclosure proof-of-concept (ZK) technology were twice as likely to reveal critical bugs compared to other projects, according to The Block citing a Veridise report.

The company's experts analyzed 1,605 vulnerabilities identified in 100 audits. On average, they found 16 issues per audit, with ZK projects having a higher rate of 18 bugs.

In terms of critical vulnerabilities, 55% (11 out of 20) of ZK projects contained such issues, compared to 27.5% (22 out of 80) for other projects.

Experts noted that the security of ZK solutions is “just more complicated” because of the complex cryptographic designs and the innovative nature of the protocols. Veridise co-founder and CEO John Stevens explained that designing a ZK scheme requires precise reasoning about the semantics of the operations in the witness generator. When these constructs are incorrectly encoded due to constraints, errors occur.According to Stevens : “It makes sense that there are more errors in these schemas because they are very different from the typical programming paradigm”.

Overall, the most common vulnerabilities found in the audits were logic errors (385), maintainability (355) and data validation (304). These categories accounted for 65% of all issues identified.

Veridise emphasized that insufficient maintainability is not a security vulnerability in the strict sense, but poor code writing practices are “one step away from creating critical vulnerabilities.”

For the ZK protocols, a specific problem was “insufficiently bounded loops”, which had a 90% probability of causing a serious error. This occurs when arithmetic scheme constraints do not provide sufficient conditions to verify the correctness of the computation. Veridise noted that such conditions do not exist in traditional smart contracts.

This means that an attacker could create a proof that tricks the checker into accepting a false statement as true, seriously undermining the integrity of the protocol.

Recall, ForkLog talked about the development of ZK protocols in 2024 in an exclusive piece.

Tier I

Sector: #18291

Sealed Cache Room

Resource Cache

Resource Cache

Tier I

Requires 25% Tier Progress to Claim
Meme Cache

Meme Cache

Tier I

Requires 50% Tier Progress to Claim
Equipment Cache

Equipment Cache

Tier I

Requires 75% Tier Progress to Claim

After collecting, caches will be stored in your inventory and can be opened with Keys.

Other news

Arbitrum DAO Approves Ecosystem Incentive Programs

chest

The Arbitrum DAO has approved a governance proposal to direct treasury resources towards ecosystem growth through incentive programs.

user avatarJacob Williams

FBI Takes Action Against Hamas Fundraising with Cryptocurrency Seizure

chest

The FBI has seized approximately $560,000 in cryptocurrency linked to Hamas as part of efforts to disrupt terrorist fundraising operations.

user avatarZainab Kamara

Solana Ecosystem Tokens Outperform Broader Altcoin Market

chest

Recent performance benchmarks indicate that Solana ecosystem tokens are outpacing the broader altcoin market, highlighting the active internal rotation within the network.

user avatarSon Min-ho

Arbitrum Achieves $814 Million in Daily DEX Volume

chest

Arbitrum has recorded an impressive $814 million in daily decentralized exchange volume, showcasing strong activity on the Ethereum Layer2 network.

user avatarAyman Ben Youssef

Securitize Enhances Tokenization Framework for Public Equities

chest

Securitize has enhanced its framework for tokenizing public equities, contributing to the integration of traditional assets into blockchain infrastructure.

user avatarTando Nkube

Significant Surge in Dogecoin Network Activity

chest

Significant surge in Dogecoin network activity with a 35% rise in active addresses and daily transactions exceeding 12 million.

user avatarKofi Adjeman

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.