DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

user avatar

by Elena Ryabokon

2 years ago


DeFi audits of projects based on zero-disclosure proof-of-concept (ZK) technology were twice as likely to reveal critical bugs compared to other projects, according to The Block citing a Veridise report.

The company's experts analyzed 1,605 vulnerabilities identified in 100 audits. On average, they found 16 issues per audit, with ZK projects having a higher rate of 18 bugs.

In terms of critical vulnerabilities, 55% (11 out of 20) of ZK projects contained such issues, compared to 27.5% (22 out of 80) for other projects.

Experts noted that the security of ZK solutions is “just more complicated” because of the complex cryptographic designs and the innovative nature of the protocols. Veridise co-founder and CEO John Stevens explained that designing a ZK scheme requires precise reasoning about the semantics of the operations in the witness generator. When these constructs are incorrectly encoded due to constraints, errors occur.According to Stevens : “It makes sense that there are more errors in these schemas because they are very different from the typical programming paradigm”.

Overall, the most common vulnerabilities found in the audits were logic errors (385), maintainability (355) and data validation (304). These categories accounted for 65% of all issues identified.

Veridise emphasized that insufficient maintainability is not a security vulnerability in the strict sense, but poor code writing practices are “one step away from creating critical vulnerabilities.”

For the ZK protocols, a specific problem was “insufficiently bounded loops”, which had a 90% probability of causing a serious error. This occurs when arithmetic scheme constraints do not provide sufficient conditions to verify the correctness of the computation. Veridise noted that such conditions do not exist in traditional smart contracts.

This means that an attacker could create a proof that tricks the checker into accepting a false statement as true, seriously undermining the integrity of the protocol.

Recall, ForkLog talked about the development of ZK protocols in 2024 in an exclusive piece.

Tier I

Sector: #18291

Sealed Hiding Place Room

Resource Cache

Resource Cache

Tier I

Requires 25% Tier Progress to Claim
Meme Cache

Meme Cache

Tier I

Requires 50% Tier Progress to Claim
Equipment Cache

Equipment Cache

Tier I

Requires 75% Tier Progress to Claim

After collecting, hiding places will be stored in your inventory and can be opened with Keys.

Other news

BotPsy Sets New Standards in AI Performance Benchmarks

Tether's QVAC BotPsy has achieved impressive scores in AI performance benchmarks, scoring 440 on BFCL v4 and 587 on ACEBench, surpassing larger models and demonstrating the potential of smaller AI models.

user avatarMiguel Rodriguez

Tether Launches Innovative AI Model QVAC BotPsy

Tether introduces QVAC BotPsy, an AI model with 800 million parameters that excels in performing everyday tasks on personal devices.

user avatarRajesh Kumar

CoreWeave's Strong Q3 Performance Boosts AI Sector Sentiment

CoreWeave's strong Q3 results have increased investor sentiment in the AI sector, reporting $366 million in revenue, a 168% year-over-year increase, and raised full-year guidance.

user avatarLuis Flores

Deutsche Bank Launches Crypto Custody Service for Institutions

Deutsche Bank has officially launched its crypto custody service for institutional and corporate clients in Europe.

user avatarArif Mukhtar

Yana Prikhodchenko Takes the Helm as CEO of Phase

Yana Prikhodchenko has been appointed as cofounder and CEO of Phase, a technology company focused on the AI agent economy.

user avatarDavid Robinson

Phase Unveils Layer 1 Blockchain Mainnet and AI Agent Services

Phase has launched its Layer 1 blockchain mainnet and AI agent services, enabling autonomous operations for AI agents.

user avatarMaria Gutierrez

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.