• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M
DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

user avatar

by Elena Ryabokon

2 years ago


DeFi audits of projects based on zero-disclosure proof-of-concept (ZK) technology were twice as likely to reveal critical bugs compared to other projects, according to The Block citing a Veridise report.

The company's experts analyzed 1,605 vulnerabilities identified in 100 audits. On average, they found 16 issues per audit, with ZK projects having a higher rate of 18 bugs.

In terms of critical vulnerabilities, 55% (11 out of 20) of ZK projects contained such issues, compared to 27.5% (22 out of 80) for other projects.

Experts noted that the security of ZK solutions is “just more complicated” because of the complex cryptographic designs and the innovative nature of the protocols. Veridise co-founder and CEO John Stevens explained that designing a ZK scheme requires precise reasoning about the semantics of the operations in the witness generator. When these constructs are incorrectly encoded due to constraints, errors occur.According to Stevens : “It makes sense that there are more errors in these schemas because they are very different from the typical programming paradigm”.

Overall, the most common vulnerabilities found in the audits were logic errors (385), maintainability (355) and data validation (304). These categories accounted for 65% of all issues identified.

Veridise emphasized that insufficient maintainability is not a security vulnerability in the strict sense, but poor code writing practices are “one step away from creating critical vulnerabilities.”

For the ZK protocols, a specific problem was “insufficiently bounded loops”, which had a 90% probability of causing a serious error. This occurs when arithmetic scheme constraints do not provide sufficient conditions to verify the correctness of the computation. Veridise noted that such conditions do not exist in traditional smart contracts.

This means that an attacker could create a proof that tricks the checker into accepting a false statement as true, seriously undermining the integrity of the protocol.

Recall, ForkLog talked about the development of ZK protocols in 2024 in an exclusive piece.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Zcash Surges to New High as Institutional Interest Grows

chest

Zcash (ZEC) has surged to a new year-to-date high of 590, driven by significant institutional investment from Multicoin Capital.

user avatarTenzin Dorje

Sabadell Joins European Banking Consortium for Stablecoin Initiative

chest

Spanish bank Sabadell has joined the Qivalis consortium aimed at launching a Europe-pegged stablecoin.

user avatarBayarjavkhlan Ganbaatar

Ripple CEO Highlights Critical Hearing for CLARITY Act's Future

chest

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse emphasizes the importance of the upcoming Senate Banking Committee hearing for the CLARITY Act's progress.

user avatarMohamed Farouk

Bitcoin Holds Steady Above 80,000 as Market Recovery is Tested

chest

Bitcoin's price remains above 80,000, indicating a recovery from March lows, with differing behaviors observed among large holders.

user avatarElias Mukuru

Gerstein Harrow LLP Files Restraining Notice Over Ethereum Linked to Kelp DAO Hack

chest

Gerstein Harrow LLP has filed a restraining notice in a New York district court, claiming legal rights to approximately 30,766 Ethereum frozen after the Kelp DAO hack.

user avatarDiego Alvarez

Aave Takes Legal Action to Release Frozen Ethereum in Kelp DAO Hack Case

chest

Aave has filed an emergency motion in a New York district court to vacate a restraining notice blocking the Arbitrum DAO from accessing approximately 30,766 Ethereum frozen after the Kelp DAO hack.

user avatarKenji Takahashi

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.