• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M
DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

user avatar

by Elena Ryabokon

a year ago


DeFi audits of projects based on zero-disclosure proof-of-concept (ZK) technology were twice as likely to reveal critical bugs compared to other projects, according to The Block citing a Veridise report.

The company's experts analyzed 1,605 vulnerabilities identified in 100 audits. On average, they found 16 issues per audit, with ZK projects having a higher rate of 18 bugs.

In terms of critical vulnerabilities, 55% (11 out of 20) of ZK projects contained such issues, compared to 27.5% (22 out of 80) for other projects.

Experts noted that the security of ZK solutions is “just more complicated” because of the complex cryptographic designs and the innovative nature of the protocols. Veridise co-founder and CEO John Stevens explained that designing a ZK scheme requires precise reasoning about the semantics of the operations in the witness generator. When these constructs are incorrectly encoded due to constraints, errors occur.According to Stevens : “It makes sense that there are more errors in these schemas because they are very different from the typical programming paradigm”.

Overall, the most common vulnerabilities found in the audits were logic errors (385), maintainability (355) and data validation (304). These categories accounted for 65% of all issues identified.

Veridise emphasized that insufficient maintainability is not a security vulnerability in the strict sense, but poor code writing practices are “one step away from creating critical vulnerabilities.”

For the ZK protocols, a specific problem was “insufficiently bounded loops”, which had a 90% probability of causing a serious error. This occurs when arithmetic scheme constraints do not provide sufficient conditions to verify the correctness of the computation. Veridise noted that such conditions do not exist in traditional smart contracts.

This means that an attacker could create a proof that tricks the checker into accepting a false statement as true, seriously undermining the integrity of the protocol.

Recall, ForkLog talked about the development of ZK protocols in 2024 in an exclusive piece.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Chinese AI Startups Make Strong Debuts on Hong Kong Stock Exchange

chest

This week, two major Chinese AI startups, MiniMax and Zhipu AI, made strong debuts on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, signaling a growing investor confidence in the sector.

user avatarLi Weicheng

Robinhood Unveils Ethereum Layer2 Blockchain: Robinhood Chain

chest

Robinhood announces the launch of Robinhood Chain, an Ethereum Layer2 blockchain solution aimed at facilitating the trading of tokenized assets for EU users.

user avatarLeo van der Veen

Chinese AI Researchers Address Technology Gap with the US

chest

Leading Chinese AI researchers discuss challenges and opportunities in closing the technology gap with the US, emphasizing the need for advanced chipmaking equipment.

user avatarMaya Lundqvist

a16z Predicts Shift in Blockchain Security Practices

chest

a16z partners predict a shift in security practices from 'code is law' to 'spec is law' in blockchain protocols.

user avatarAisha Farooq

House Democrats Push for Legislation Against Political Betting

chest

A coalition of over 30 House Democrats, led by Rep Ritchie Torres and including former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, has introduced the 2026 Financial Prediction Market Public Integrity Act to prohibit federal officials from engaging in political betting.

user avatarTenzin Dorje

ENA Shows Signs of Recovery After Prolonged Weakness

chest

ENA is attempting to shift from a basebuilding phase to a more constructive phase as it tests critical support levels.

user avatarBayarjavkhlan Ganbaatar

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.