• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M
DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

DeFi audit: ZK projects lead in the number of critical vulnerabilities

user avatar

by Elena Ryabokon

2 years ago


DeFi audits of projects based on zero-disclosure proof-of-concept (ZK) technology were twice as likely to reveal critical bugs compared to other projects, according to The Block citing a Veridise report.

The company's experts analyzed 1,605 vulnerabilities identified in 100 audits. On average, they found 16 issues per audit, with ZK projects having a higher rate of 18 bugs.

In terms of critical vulnerabilities, 55% (11 out of 20) of ZK projects contained such issues, compared to 27.5% (22 out of 80) for other projects.

Experts noted that the security of ZK solutions is “just more complicated” because of the complex cryptographic designs and the innovative nature of the protocols. Veridise co-founder and CEO John Stevens explained that designing a ZK scheme requires precise reasoning about the semantics of the operations in the witness generator. When these constructs are incorrectly encoded due to constraints, errors occur.According to Stevens : “It makes sense that there are more errors in these schemas because they are very different from the typical programming paradigm”.

Overall, the most common vulnerabilities found in the audits were logic errors (385), maintainability (355) and data validation (304). These categories accounted for 65% of all issues identified.

Veridise emphasized that insufficient maintainability is not a security vulnerability in the strict sense, but poor code writing practices are “one step away from creating critical vulnerabilities.”

For the ZK protocols, a specific problem was “insufficiently bounded loops”, which had a 90% probability of causing a serious error. This occurs when arithmetic scheme constraints do not provide sufficient conditions to verify the correctness of the computation. Veridise noted that such conditions do not exist in traditional smart contracts.

This means that an attacker could create a proof that tricks the checker into accepting a false statement as true, seriously undermining the integrity of the protocol.

Recall, ForkLog talked about the development of ZK protocols in 2024 in an exclusive piece.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Concerns Surrounding Ethereum Foundation Spark Debate

chest

Concerns about the Ethereum Foundation's management have led to increased FUD, but development continues through various contributors.

user avatarArif Mukhtar

Ethereum Enters a Period of Stabilization Amid Market Instability.

chest

Ethereum has entered a rangebound structure following a strong rally, allowing the market to absorb gains and establish new support levels.

user avatarLuis Flores

Lingrid Identifies Ideal Buy Zone for Ethereum Amid Market Dip

chest

Crypto expert Lingrid highlights a 'Kill Zone' for Ethereum, suggesting optimal entry points for traders.

user avatarMaria Gutierrez

Bitcoin Faces Increasing Bearish Pressure as Key Support Levels Threatened

chest

Bitcoin is showing signs of weakness as bearish pressure builds below critical technical levels, with key support zones under threat.

user avatarDavid Robinson

Surge in XRP Payment Activity During Market Decline

chest

Surge in XRP payment activity during market decline, with payments processed on the XRP Ledger increasing from below 1 million to 122 million by May 22.

user avatarJacob Williams

FDIC Proposes New Compliance Standards for Stablecoin Issuers

chest

The FDIC has proposed new regulations requiring Permitted Payment Stablecoin Issuers to comply with existing banking compliance standards.

user avatarAndrew Smith

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.