• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

Activision's Legal Response to Uvalde Shooting Allegations

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

a year ago


Activision has legally responded to allegations that Call of Duty influenced the Uvalde school shooter. The company cited freedom of expression and California's laws to have the charges removed.

Activision's Response to the Lawsuit

Activision, the creator of the Call of Duty series, has formally responded to a lawsuit filed by families of the victims of the Uvalde school shooting in 2022. The lawsuit claimed that Activision's games contributed to the shooter's radicalization. The company replied with a 145-page document stating that their games are a form of artistic expression protected by California's laws. Activision argued that video games should be considered creative works akin to literature or film.

Gamer Community Reaction

The gaming community has been actively discussing this issue. Some gamers argue that the shooting mimicked levels and scenes from Call of Duty, thus blaming the developers. However, most gamers dismissed the lawsuit, suggesting that the blame should instead lie with the police for their inaction. Gamers also suggested policy changes in gun ownership and looking at international examples to prevent future tragedies.

Significance of the Upcoming Hearing

The hearing, scheduled for April 15, 2025, is pivotal for the gaming industry. It will determine if the lawsuit is dismissed under California's protections. The court's decision will influence how responsibility is allocated in cases of mass violence like this one.

The hearing's outcome will define the future interaction between society and law regarding video games within public safety contexts and will have long-lasting implications for the gaming industry.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Simon Dixon Critiques Ripple and XRP's Impact on Bitcoin

chest

Simon Dixon critiques Ripple and XRP for undermining Bitcoin's purpose, describing XRP as a psyop that causes division in the crypto community.

user avatarFilippo Romano

Steak n Shake Reports Increased Sales After Accepting Bitcoin Payments

chest

Steak n Shake has reported increased same-store sales after accepting Bitcoin payments since May 2025.

user avatarTomas Novak

BNB Chain Enhances Ecosystem with New AI Agent Standards

chest

BNB Chain has rolled out support for AI agent standards ERC8004 and BAP578 to enhance the identity and functionality of autonomous AI agents.

user avatarEmily Carter

Crypto and Banking Industries Clash Over Stablecoin Yield

chest

Discussions between the crypto and banking industries regarding stablecoin yield have yet to reach a compromise, posing a significant hurdle for the CLARITY Act.

user avatarKaterina Papadopoulou

Analysis Reveals Distinct Selling Patterns on Upbit

chest

Dom's analysis of 82 million trades on Upbit shows a consistent negative net selling of XRP, with only one week out of 46 being positive.

user avatarMaya Lundqvist

CFTC Chair Optimistic About CLARITY Act's Future

chest

CFTC Chair Mike Selig is optimistic about the CLARITY Act's progress in Congress, aiming to establish clear rules for digital asset markets in the U.S.

user avatarLeo van der Veen

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.