The SEC is appealing the recent court ruling in the Ripple case, even though it lacks strong evidence to support its claims. The agency struggles to prove that XRP buyers expected profits based on Ripple’s efforts.

SEC's Ripple Appeal

The SEC is contesting the recent court ruling in the Ripple case, despite lacking convincing evidence in its favor. Judge Torres ruled that Ripple's actions, including the sale of XRP held in escrow, did not influence price movements enough to establish investor profit expectations.

Expert Testimonies Dismissed

The SEC faces challenges as the court dismissed its expert testimonies due to unreliable methodology. The defendants successfully argued that the expert's assumptions about a ‘reasonable XRP purchaser’ were speculative.

Insufficient Evidence of Profit Expectations

The SEC's case now hinges on convincing the appeals court that these buyers expected returns based on Ripple's operations. However, the agency struggles to substantiate this expectation, as the expert testimonies were dismissed for unreliability, and many buyers were unaware or unaffected by Ripple's efforts.

The SEC's appeal in the Ripple case faces significant challenges due to the lack of key evidence and dismissed expert testimonies, raising questions about the viability of the agency's arguments in the appeals court.