A recent post by user BuryMeBig on Twitter sparked intense discussions in the XRP community concerning Ripple's relationship with its supporters known as the XRP Army.
Perception of Ripple by Users
In his post, BuryMeBig claimed that Ripple does not value individual investors who have long supported the project and its visibility, especially during legal disputes. He emphasized that despite the loyalty of XRP holders, the company does not offer reciprocal acknowledgment, which has led to dissatisfaction among users.
Crypto Bitlord's Response to Criticism
Well-known crypto investor Crypto Bitlord reacted to BuryMeBig's post by stating that the XRP Army played a crucial role in Ripple's survival. He argued that without community support, the company would not have been able to compete. Bitlord also highlighted the issue that Ripple sold XRP to finance its operations from 2013 to 2021, which pressured holders. He posed a question about whether Ripple acknowledges the contributions of its supporters.
Reactions from Other Users
Following the discussion between BuryMeBig and Crypto Bitlord, other users also shared their views. An account named random.NPC supported the criticism, arguing that Ripple focuses on corporate contracts and neglects retail investors. In contrast, user Kevin Quinton dismissed the criticism, claiming that negative assertions about Ripple were unfounded and that the company’s efforts would ultimately benefit XRP holders.
The discussion surrounding the XRP Army's support and Ripple's relationship with its supporters underscores the differing perspectives on the company's strategy. While some argue that Ripple overlooks its supporters, others emphasize the importance of a long-term strategy and establishing corporate partnerships.
