- Difference in Capital Expenditure
- Payback Periods and Conditions
- Impact on the Future of Bitcoin Mining
In a recent analysis by industry expert Beezy, the capital expenditure (Capex) requirements and payback periods for Bitcoin mining were compared to those for High-Performance Computing (HPC). Stark differences in the economic viability of the two sectors were revealed.
Difference in Capital Expenditure
Bitcoin mining requires significantly lower development costs per megawatt (MW) compared to HPC. However, HPC stands out with much faster payback periods, especially when utilizing cutting-edge Nvidia H100 compute units.
Payback Periods and Conditions
The analysis highlights that to achieve a comparable payback period to HPC, Bitcoin mining operations would require exceptionally low power costs—below $20 per megawatt-hour (MWh). This is based on current conditions, including a $47 PH/s hashprice, operating S21 Pros at $21 per terahash, and a $300,000 per MW buildout cost.
Impact on the Future of Bitcoin Mining
These findings underscore the critical importance of securing low-cost power for Bitcoin mining to remain competitive. As the economics of HPC and AI become more favorable, large-scale sites may increasingly shift focus toward these applications, potentially relegating Bitcoin mining to smaller-scale operations that capitalize on stranded energy or other niche power sources.
The analysis demonstrates that in order for Bitcoin mining to remain competitive, efforts to lower power costs are essential. Meanwhile, the HPC and AI industries are discovering new growth and development opportunities.
Comments