• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M

Elon Musk Faces SEC Lawsuit for Late Disclosure of Twitter Stocks

user avatar

by Giorgi Kostiuk

a year ago


The SEC has filed a lawsuit against Elon Musk, accusing him of violating federal securities laws by delaying the disclosure of his Twitter stock ownership.

Allegations of Delayed Disclosure

The SEC's lawsuit, filed on Tuesday in a Washington, D.C. federal court, accuses Musk of failing to disclose his purchase of over 5% of Twitter shares within the required 10-day period. By law, investors must report such a stake within 10 calendar days of surpassing the 5% threshold. However, Musk delayed his disclosure by 11 days beyond the March 2022 deadline. This allowed him to purchase Twitter shares worth over $500 million at a discount before his acquisition became public. When he finally disclosed his 9.2% stake on April 4, 2022, Twitter’s share price surged by more than 27%, benefiting Musk.

Financial Impact and Investor Consequences

The SEC argues that Musk's late disclosure harmed other investors by preventing them from making informed decisions about Twitter's stock. According to the SEC, had the public known about Musk’s interest in the company sooner, the stock price would likely have risen, causing investors to pay higher prices for their shares. Consequently, the SEC claims that Musk underpaid by at least $150 million for the Twitter shares he purchased after the required filing deadline.

Musk's Response and Criticism of the SEC

Elon Musk responded to the SEC's lawsuit on X, calling the organization a 'totally broken' entity. He criticized the SEC for focusing on what he called a minor issue while other significant crimes remain unaddressed. Musk's criticism reflects his long-standing conflict with the regulatory body, especially over past investigations and settlements. Musk’s legal team, led by Alex Spiro, argued that the lawsuit was a culmination of the SEC’s 'multi-year campaign of harassment' against Musk. According to Spiro, the case is based on a 'mere administrative failure to file a single form,' which, if proven, carries a nominal penalty. He maintained that Musk had done nothing wrong and dismissed the lawsuit as a baseless attack.

This lawsuit is part of the ongoing conflict between Elon Musk and the SEC, periodically arising due to his business and personal activities.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other news

Zcash Surges to New High as Institutional Interest Grows

chest

Zcash (ZEC) has surged to a new year-to-date high of 590, driven by significant institutional investment from Multicoin Capital.

user avatarTenzin Dorje

Sabadell Joins European Banking Consortium for Stablecoin Initiative

chest

Spanish bank Sabadell has joined the Qivalis consortium aimed at launching a Europe-pegged stablecoin.

user avatarBayarjavkhlan Ganbaatar

Ripple CEO Highlights Critical Hearing for CLARITY Act's Future

chest

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse emphasizes the importance of the upcoming Senate Banking Committee hearing for the CLARITY Act's progress.

user avatarMohamed Farouk

Bitcoin Holds Steady Above 80,000 as Market Recovery is Tested

chest

Bitcoin's price remains above 80,000, indicating a recovery from March lows, with differing behaviors observed among large holders.

user avatarElias Mukuru

Gerstein Harrow LLP Files Restraining Notice Over Ethereum Linked to Kelp DAO Hack

chest

Gerstein Harrow LLP has filed a restraining notice in a New York district court, claiming legal rights to approximately 30,766 Ethereum frozen after the Kelp DAO hack.

user avatarDiego Alvarez

Aave Takes Legal Action to Release Frozen Ethereum in Kelp DAO Hack Case

chest

Aave has filed an emergency motion in a New York district court to vacate a restraining notice blocking the Arbitrum DAO from accessing approximately 30,766 Ethereum frozen after the Kelp DAO hack.

user avatarKenji Takahashi

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.