The investment firm Kerrisdale Capital argues that MicroStrategy's share price, primarily influenced by its Bitcoin (BTC) holdings, is exceedingly high and unjustifiable. According to the firm, investors have inflated MicroStrategy's premium due to its BTC holdings acquired through debt financings, equity-linked convertible notes, and ATM equity offerings as seen in a March 28 analyst report. The firm critiqued the notion of leveraging to purchase more BTC as intelligent.
Bitcoin ETFs May Render MicroStrategy Redundant
The investment firm highlighted that the introduction of Spot Bitcoin ETFs in the U.S. could lessen the necessity for investors to trade MicroStrategy stocks to access Bitcoin. Kerrisdale Capital suggests that MicroStrategy no longer presents investors with a unique way to gain exposure to Bitcoin. The firm also critiqued other reasons supporting MSTR's value, including the ability to purchase more BTC with the software company's cash flows, access to liquidity, the absence of management fees, and ease of trading MSTR as weak, rendering them short shares of MicroStrategy.
Michael Saylor Remains Optimistic About the Company
Despite Kerrisdale Capital's analysis, MicroStrategy's CEO, Michael Saylor, maintains confidence in the company's appeal to investors. Saylor noted that in addition to not charging fees, MicroStrategy offers leverage to investors, which distinguishes it from spot Bitcoin ETFs. Recently, Saylor announced that the company will be rebranded as a "Bitcoin development company," citing this decision as a natural progression due to MicroStrategy's successful Bitcoin investments.
Related Articles:
- Upcoming Crypto Presales: Unlock Early Investment Opportunities!
- Best Bitcoin Casinos in 2024
- Fetch.ai Price Prediction: FET Jumps 5% As This World-First AR/VR Presale Races Towards $3 Million
Smog (SMOG) - Meme Coin With Rewards
- Airdrop Season One Live Now
- Earn XP To Qualify For A Share Of $1 Million
- Featured On Cointelegraph
- Staking Rewards - 42% APY
- 10% OTC Discount - smogtoken.com
Comments