Crypto experts scrutinize the Gate.io exchange

Crypto experts scrutinize the Gate.io exchange

user avatar

by dapp_writer005

4 years ago


After the collapse of FTX, one of the largest cryptocurrency exchanges, the attention of experts focused on all CEX industry exchanges. One of them - Gate.io. A number of studies are currently underway to help to identify hidden problems and questionable transactions. 

On November 15, it became known that 4 years ago, Gate.io could have become a victim of hackers and as a result of the attack, lost more than $ 200 million. However, the leaders of the exchange preferred to hide this incident. Such information can significantly undermine customer confidence in this platform. 

Also, analysts noticed questionable assets in Gate.io's total reserves and several suspicious transactions. 

On October 21, Gate.io received 320,000 ETH from the Crypto.com exchange, and then between October 25 and 30, Gate.io made a reverse refund of 284,975 ETH. It is possible that the payment was in error. However, the question remains where the other 35,025 ETH went.

The transfer of 320 thousand ETH coincided with the time when Gate.io presented a report on the status of its reserves. According to the head of Binance, Changpeng Zhao, such actions may indicate serious financial problems on the exchange.

Gate.io founder Lin Han noted that the exchange regularly audits reserves and users can check all the information at any time. The auditor is Armanino. The same one that worked with FTX.

On Nov. 17, Gate.io is ranked #11 in trading volume data with $928 million.

Tier I

Sector: #18291

Sealed Hiding Place Room

Resource Cache

Resource Cache

Tier I

Requires 25% Tier Progress to Claim
Meme Cache

Meme Cache

Tier I

Requires 50% Tier Progress to Claim
Equipment Cache

Equipment Cache

Tier I

Requires 75% Tier Progress to Claim

After collecting, hiding places will be stored in your inventory and can be opened with Keys.

Other articles

Tracing a News Claim Back to Its Source

Search results find a claim. Source tracing shows what supports it, which conditions matter, and whether repeated reports add independent evidence.

user avatarme1afon

Turning Repeated Questions Into an Editorial Brief

How to turn repeated reader questions into a focused, evidence-based article without mistaking a small signal for universal demand.

user avatarme1afon

Why People Share Privately but Stay Quiet in Public

A private message and a public post reach different audiences. Research suggests that difference can change what a sender chooses to share.

user avatarme1afon

Measuring the Readers Behind Social Clicks

A practical way to connect social posts to on-site engagement without mistaking a click or a session for proof that someone read.

user avatarme1afon

What an Open Algorithm Can—and Cannot—Tell You About a Live Feed

A practical guide to distinguishing published recommendation code from evidence about a live feed.

user avatarme1afon

Visibility Filters and Ranking Solve Different Problems

Why eligibility and predicted relevance are separate questions in the reviewed X For You pipeline.

user avatarme1afon

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.