• Dapps:16.23K
  • Blockchains:78
  • Active users:66.47M
  • 30d volume:$303.26B
  • 30d transactions:$879.24M
TVL in decentralized finance: performance indicators of blockchain projects

TVL in decentralized finance: performance indicators of blockchain projects

user avatar

by Alexandra Smirnova

2 years ago


In the world of decentralized finance (DeFi), an increasing number of indicators are emerging that allow for the assessment of the efficiency and reliability of various blockchain projects. One such key indicator is TVL, or Total Value Locked. This metric not only reflects the current state of affairs in the DeFi world but also provides a deep understanding of the dynamics and potential of blockchain projects.

Contents:

TVL in Decentralized Finance: Indicators of Blockchain Project Efficiency - news

What is TVL

Total Value Locked (TVL) is a key indicator that helps assess the value of blockchain services, protocols, or applications. The use of smart contracts in these applications leads to innovations in the financial sector, as they automate contractual processes and eliminate the need for traditional financial intermediaries such as banks and exchanges.

Smart contracts contribute to the development of decentralized finance (DeFi). Thanks to the transparency of the blockchain, which serves as a public ledger of transactions, TVL allows for monitoring the volume of funds involved in individual smart contracts and in the entire ecosystem of blockchain applications (for example, on Ethereum). TVL is a primary indicator that shows user interest in various protocols, known as decentralized applications (dApps).

Principles of Calculation and Significance of TVL

To understand the mechanism of calculating TVL, one can consider the example of Uniswap, one of the largest decentralized exchanges (DEX), which pioneered the creation of automated market makers (AMMs). This allowed users to exchange tokens without intermediaries.

Anyone can invest funds in Uniswap's liquidity pools, which consist of paired tokens. These pools lock user funds, turning them into liquidity providers. When traders want to exchange tokens (for example, USDT or ETH), they use the corresponding pool. Liquidity providers earn a percentage of the token exchange.

Each liquidity pool has its own TVL, which shows the total amount of cryptocurrency funds in dollar equivalent received in the pool.

The total liquidity of the Uniswap exchange is determined by summing the funds of all its pools. Similarly, one can calculate TVL by combining liquidity pools of different networks supported by Uniswap, such as Arbitrum, Polygon, Optimism, Celo, and others. As of early July, the total value of tokens locked in all Uniswap pools amounted to $4.11 billion according to DefiLlama.

The same method of calculating TVL is applicable to lending protocols, such as Aave or Curve. However, certain nuances of calculations should be considered:

  • TVL does not take into account unpaid loans and the yield of deposits for liquidity providers, but only reflects the value of smart contract deposits.
  • When calculating TVL for an entire blockchain network (for example, Ethereum), the total TVL of all applications is considered. As of July, the TVL of all dApps in the Ethereum network was $26.77 billion, accounting for about 60% of the entire DeFi market.

It is also worth noting the significant functions of TVL 

Aspect of TVL Description Impact on Projects
Volume of Deposits Shows the amount of funds invested in the protocol or blockchain network. Reflects the popularity and trust of users in the project.
Liquidity A higher TVL indicates high liquidity of the protocol. Ensures efficiency and stability of operations within the project.
Stability of Currency Circulation A low TVL may indicate instability. Affects the profitability of liquidity providers and the overall state of the protocol.
Ratio to Market Capitalization Comparison of TVL with the market capitalization of dApp. Helps assess whether the protocol is overvalued or undervalued.
Influence of Major Investors Large deposits or withdrawals can significantly change TVL. Affects the stability and predictability of TVL.
User Activity The total number of users influencing TVL. Shows the real user interest and participation in the project.
Artificial Activity Actions aimed at inflating activity (e.g., anticipation of airdrops). Can distort the real picture of TVL, creating a false perception of popularity.

 

TVL in Decentralized Finance: Indicators of Blockchain Project Efficiency - news

The Reliability of Total Value Locked

If the market capitalization of a dApp exceeds its TVL, this may indicate an overvaluation of the protocol. Conversely, a market capitalization to TVL ratio less than one suggests potential undervaluation. This ratio for DeFi services often changes.

Market capitalization depends on the price of the main token of the service, multiplied by its total circulating supply. For example, for Uniswap, this token is UNI. Its price is influenced by market trends, listings on exchanges, protocol updates, and other events.

A lower market capitalization than TVL at Uniswap ($4.11 billion versus $4.127 billion) indicates a slight overvaluation. Platforms with a TVL of less than $1B should be considered cautiously due to risks.

Another factor affecting TVL is the actions of large investors or organizations with significant crypto assets. They can significantly increase or decrease TVL by making or withdrawing large sums.

It is also important to consider the total number of users of the protocol or blockchain.

The growing popularity of airdrops in blockchain projects leads to artificial increases in activity. People use bots and accounts to maximize actions in anticipation of airdrops, affecting TVL. Project representatives believe that developer activity (code updates) can be a more objective indicator than TVL. This activity can be tracked through Github or Developerreport.

0

Rewards

chest
chest
chest
chest

More rewards

Discover enhanced rewards on our social media.

chest

Other articles

HANDL Review: Sending Crypto by Username Instead of Blockchain Addresses

chest

HANDL connects social media usernames with crypto wallets, enabling simple cross-chain transfers without complex blockchain addresses.

user avatarElena Ryabokon

GNME MINING Review: Play-to-Earn Mining Game with GNME Token

chest

Overview of GNME MINING — a Web3 game on Solana with mining simulator mechanics, GNME token rewards, Telegram integration, and Play-to-Earn model.

user avatarElena Ryabokon

NOYA.ai Review: AI & ZKML Infrastructure for Omnichain DeFi Strategies

chest

Overview of NOYA.ai — a DeFi platform using AI and ZKML for automated liquidity allocation, yield optimization, and cross-chain strategies across multiple blockchains.

user avatarElena Ryabokon

Immunefi: Protecting DeFi and dApps Through Bug Bounty Programs

chest

Overview of Immunefi — the leading Web3 bug bounty platform. Vulnerability discovery, DeFi protection, white hat community, and the role of the IMU token in blockchain security.

user avatarElena Ryabokon

Brilliantcrypto Review: NFT Gem Mining and BRIL Token Economy Explained

chest

Overview of Brilliantcrypto: mining digital gems, BRIL token utility, Proof of Gaming model, NFT tools and Polygon-based game economy.

user avatarElena Ryabokon

Ponziland Review: Strategy, Virtual Lands, and DeFi Earnings Explained

chest

Detailed overview of Ponziland — an on-chain game with real tokenomics, land taxes, and DeFi mechanics. Learn how it works, earning strategies, and key risks.

user avatarElena Ryabokon

Important disclaimer: The information presented on the Dapp.Expert portal is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an investment recommendation or a guide to action in the field of cryptocurrencies. The Dapp.Expert team is not responsible for any potential losses or missed profits associated with the use of materials published on the site. Before making investment decisions in cryptocurrencies, we recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.